Search results

Short range ballistic with some terminal maneuver.

First one is a problem but not the problem related to missile. It is the work of either radar or satellite or air surveillance to detect it. Second is the genuine problem related with missile. Pure Ballistic missile see only sky till its reach its highest point. If the trajectory is depressed...

Pruthvi II changes its trajectory in terminal phase. Prithvi III has an anti ship role as well. so both of these missiles maneuvers in terminal phase.

What does this mean? Many Indian missiles including Pruthvi does this.

Yes, this is good but depressed trajectory can be better to hit aircraft carrier because it will always point its nose towards Aircraft carrier.

I do not know exactly which trajectory Agni 1 P follows but any missile which follows what Avinash chander called shaped a trajectory are ideal candidate for Aircraft carrier killer. Something like K15 or K4 which follows depressed trajectory and has a capability to change its direction in...

This one is not Pruthvi's replacement. Ideally, it has almost similar range to Agni II. this one can be used in place of Agni I and Agni II between a range of 700 km to 2700km.

lighter, faster, more range, high accuracy, BMD deceiving feature, canister.

How can it replace Pruthvi?

Last time when Agni P was tested, It was declared that It was a 2 stage missile opposite to old Agni 1 which was a single stage missile .

The most important thing is that it is 2 stage like agni II? Old Agni I was a single stage missile. Can anybody explain why?