Search results

Thread cleansed.

Our testing has been limited unlike P5 countries so boosted fission bombs are our reliable option. India might have H bombs but their reliability, need of testing or simulation is enough etc., will never be public.

Well, you aren't very good with interpretations. And still repeated attempts to look smart are making you look like a .. You essentially asked me about "quality of simulation" where I stated has to include parameters. With increased study of reactors and lab & sub critical tests, parameters...

Next time it would be better if you avoid a response before reading conversation.

I refer to parameters it covers.

Accuracy of simulation whether it's going to succeed depends upon quality of simulation. I reject your "still testing is real proof" argument as vague hereby.

No less than 38kT by any reliable source. "Most sources" suggest between 40-48kT. Things aren't that simple. P5 in 60s, all were using analogoue systems unlike India in 2010s which has adopted a lot of simulation abilities since 80s. And just because India is making SLBM of 60s in 2010s, won't...

Pokharan device was itself a miniaturized bomb of a 250kT model which produced at least 38kT per foreign sources. It doesn't mean that India shouldn't do more tests. But reliability doesn't solely depends upon direct testing.

But they are making me confident. If they are pi$$ed off, means things are getting sound and fine.

Experts worry that India is creating new fuel for an arsenal of H-bombs Tribal lands are taken for a top-secret atomic city, known as Challakere, where centrifuges will spin uranium capable of being used in powerful bombs Key findings: The Indian government is building a large new factory for...

Please note that it is a 14 years old article. So, many viewpoints and situations may not match modern scenario where India has got edge. For Cold Testing, USA, Russian Federation and PRC frequently conduct sub.critical/Cold nuclear tests to.sharpen the edge of weapons. These are only nuclear...

Can't say, a stronger missile be there or an artillery system. Or keep destroying enemy assets mindlessly without watching their faces (Cold Start) with TBWs fired from artilleries, tanks and hand picked versions.

Well, the lastest source I know is put in post #257. Before it, I only heard about such a project underway a decade ago, somewhere between 2000 & 2005. Thermobaric Weapons most destructive explosives besides nuclear weapons. Standard Ammo has 25% fuel and 75% oxidizers. Thermobaric Weapon is...

If India operationalizes Vaccum bombs (TBW), I don't think there will be any emphasis on Tactical Nuclear War Capabilities.

We have developed and tested thermobaric weapons. http://www.defenseworld.net/news/15016/India_Tests_Newly_Developed_Thermo_baric_Ammunition#.Vo8IjlOfcnU

Madarssa mathematics. ...................

Pakis say India has 492 nukes.:dude: http://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/indias-nuclear-doctrine.28284/page-27#post-1222158

Indian Nuclear City: ‘Open Secret’ – OpEd

I didn't talk or China. :rolleyes: Anyway, true or not, preparing for war thinking that China really has 3000 nuclear warheads will e better insurance.

Well, there has been a claim of enough fissile material for 1000 nuclear warheads to be possessed by India. Is that true?