Search results

@no smoking, nobody can understands gibberish you type. First of all Pakistan does not buy anything as it has no money. It has godfather like China which gives it free. The so called Pakistani missiles are Chinese missiles repainted at Kahuta labs. India has to assume that China can give any...

So, you are suggesting Pakistan's missile doesn't work? Honestly I have no idea. Do you? Since their economic scale is less than 20% of India's, there is no hope they can catch up on military build up. Pakistan's GDP is roughly 1/8 of India's now. However it maintains 50% manpower compared to...

Let us reverse the situation. Let us say India has 20 and Pakistan 120. Can Pakistan take hits from those 20 and survive? Did I say that. You make novel arguments. I would be more worried about "how to deliver" rather than crude numbers. Confidence in delivery systems is more important. May...

This is your assumption; which is likely wrong. Of course I cannot give you evidence either way, so you are entitled to your opinion. Whatever public articles you see in media about India's nuclear forces are conjectures. I disagree. First of all, information is scanty. If you think CIA (or...

I think we can detect missile launch from satellites and using radar. Radar coverage has been increased. But shooting down missiles is a different matter. I would think we have some ability to shoot down cruise missiles, but little for ballistic missiles. Our ballistic missile defence is yet...

It is primarily India's reluctance to go to war, any war, just not nuclear war. A poor country worries more how to feed and educate people. As per latest per capita figures for 2015, India is about 1617$ and Pakistan is 1450$ in 2015. India has always tried to avoid war. India's attitude is to...

Power is relative. I think India was in decline in 1975-1992 period. India's relative power started rising only post 1995. This was a time of US supremacy in the world. Because it is a recent development. It's impact on world politics is unknown yet.

You cannot convince a person who lives in lala land. The Chinese under Xi are in a massive power grab. The ambition clouds the vision, as they say. For all Indians - be very mindful of Chinese moves. And only "conventional" power can stop China from encroaching on India. The nuke proponents...

Nothing new in the post. This has been discussed ad nauseum before. Both India and Pakistan have been poor countries. The options have been rather limited. It is always a question of how you want to use your resources. A war with Pakistan is useful if it results in a solution to the problem...

Americans started war with who? Iraqi and Afghani - both who did not fly the planes. China started a war with Vietnam - we know very little about it and I would not comment. Russia starting a war is also different. Russia can as it maintains a nuclear force that matches USA. India was never in...

If Pakistan has no nuclear weapons, the chances of war actually reduce. The nuclear umbrella is a cover for terrorism. Why India has not gone to war? Yours is a meaningless question, as the answer is so obvious. The driving force in the subcontinent is not China but USA. I would say USA has...

There has to be a significant reason to fight a nuclear war. Such wars do not occur everyday. However there is no dearth of "war". What BS. I can expect such statement from a Chinese only. I read Pakistani English media daily. Do not pay attention to politics but the strategic analysts...

Nuclear weapons have not stopped any war so far. Your statement is fundamentally illogical. If you think nuclear weapons have given Pakistan a license to create sabotage in India, think again. The result will be bad for both Pakistan and China. The communist party is near its death. I take...