Search results

  1. tsunami

    Indian nuclear submarines

    I think these are wrong coz mizzile silos were in 2+2 combinations (Pure speculation) and not all 4 lined up in one.
  2. tsunami

    Indian nuclear submarines

    Intercontinental nuclear powered nuclear armed hyper sonic Torpedo :pound: :pound: :pound:
  3. tsunami

    Indian nuclear submarines

    So they are building 4 ships and 2 submarines at the same time???
  4. tsunami

    Indian nuclear submarines

    I am no expert but the operational tactics also should be completely different. SSK is stealth and with it's limited range it will mostly never cross IOR region. So it will be more of a defensive weapon to eliminate threats to IN. SSN on the other hand can go anywhere as well as wait for very...
  5. tsunami

    Indian nuclear submarines

    Bro why do you think we tested 5 different designs. Those were different designs for different size weight and missiles. Obviously if we have not made any effort to buy any heavy class bombers that means they were designed for missiles. A-3 can carry 2.5 tons of weight to 3500 km. I doubt that...
  6. tsunami

    Indian nuclear submarines

    May be... But my post was related to the maximum capacity of warhead. Which if nuclear one will be in magatons
  7. tsunami

    Indian nuclear submarines

    ^^^ Where did you find that A-5 can carry only 0.0015kt nuke. If I am not wrong mordern explosives are easily 4-5 times more powerful than TNT. So 1.5 tons of conventional explosives will be equal to 6 tons of TNT. Which is 0.006 KT TNT blast yield. 4 times higher than what you are suggesting...
Top