Search results

It's "true" according to BBC too.

That's twisted logic. Other governments (which have no business with Afghanistan), don't have to make their allegations public. Everything is talked about in the back-channels, while the media makes its cut selling stories about everything murky it finds in the process. India never "officially™"...

Russians don't have to sell Chinese weapons to the insurgents. They have their own piles of AK-47s, etc. And to talk about Chinese involvement in insurgency, one doesn't not have to officiate the Chinese providing arms. Those are Chinese arms, and every government that's not running a failed...

And India has already taken the initiative, which is better than yours: build schools, educate people, build roads, restore native industry, and local entrepreneurship. When our plan succeeds, the Afghans won't be selling their metal ores for peanuts. That exactly is what NATO and SCO are pissed...

Yeah, menial jobs (mining, transport) in exchange for far more precious natural resources. Now that's 'exploitation'. It is the country of Afghanistan, and its resources that are being exploited, and not necessarily its people.

Koji is right. NATO forces indeed protect Chinese interests in Afghanistan, and that's because indirectly they're protecting their own interests. These Chinese companies source their raw materials from Afghanistan under the peace ensured by NATO, and then sell their produce or finished products...