Search results

URL=http://img203.imageshack.us/i/acm2.png/][/URL]

it is bit off topic but you asked how su-30 mki is suppirior to f16

@ death by chocolate , first answer this question , what is the bore sight of mki vs f16,

mki has longer range bvr and longer range radar ( mki can see jf17 before it can see and mki can lanuch its missile before they can lunch because bigger range of the missile) f16 it just junk that why iaf rejected it . even gripper is more capable than f116

70% of component used in jf-17 where used in mig-23, we already decommissioned our mig 23, i think only difference is that mig-23 used two engines

even we dont know what type of avionic they are using in jf-17 when we ask they tell it top secret .simply they dont have money to upgrade with western avionics .

there is no single export order as of now

well said rocky. but pakistan is still purchasing it on soft loan, they dont even have the money to pay for it so they want to desperately export it make some profit so they can pay it back to chinese .

what more can you expect from a direction less fellow from a direction less country. when they have excepted the truth. that forum is totally bias.

Originally Mikoyan MiG-23. Fuselage, Tail and rear wings of the aircraft are almost 70% similar to those of JF-17 which is a joint venture of China and Pakistan. The only exception are the front Wings which are totally different. Internal Specifications of both the aircraft are also not alike...

sir i got banned in pakistan defence forum for just asking the capabilities of that plane , here i read some article in which it describes that 70% of jf17 component are same as mig-23 let us discuss the true ability of that plane without any bias

pakistani contribution is over estimating it comparing with lca, mig29, su-30 mki ext