Search results

Doesn't matter what institution you have. In order to carry out this kind of mission, you need 1. A spy satellite system to watch every inch of Pakistan frequently and analyze/find out all the potential shoot sites, this alone requires decades of work; 2. A live surveillance system to track the...

Currently, there are only 2 countries possessing the power to do that job, they are US and Russia. Even they can't guarantee 100% killing rate. In the case of Indo-Pakistan, neither side has the surveilling system good enough find the nuclear targets. Neither side's lack the necessary training...

Ohhhhh, you tested, but not 100% successful by Indian standard; by world standard, failed. And only one test is not enough to get H-bomb mature enough. For any warhead design, you still need to test.

If Indian government is taking Pakistan or China as her nuclear war enemy and seriously preparing the nuclear war, there is couple of things she should've done a quite long time ago: 1. Testing H-bomb; 2. Increase her nuclear weapon to at least 300+; 3. Started her mass production of Agni-5; 4...

Generally, I would assume my enemy's missile working as they said. And so far, I have found no reason to doubt their missile. Yes, after all these, the gap becomes even bigger: India is planning to buy Rafael and Pak Fa on the top of her Su-30s while Pakistan is buying JF-17 on top of J-7...

Doesn't matter! 1971 war proves that India can destroy Pakistan without nuclear weapon. So, you are suggesting Pakistan's missile doesn't work? Ok, let's put this way. 1971 war proves the superiority of India conventional forces against Pakistan. After 45 years development, the gap between...

Yes, great, a country who hasn't test her H-bomb design yet is talking about the quality. The fact is India has neither quantity, nor quality, to annihilate Pakistan. Of course, for the fan boy, one Indian nuke could equal 100 Pakistan or Chinese nuke. Simply throwing a nuclear weapon in the...

In last 60s, Russian was once planning to retaliate Chinese nuclear facilities with 200 nuclear warheads, how many warheads did Chinese have at the time? Less than 20! Today, publically Pakistan has around 120, do your math, what is necessary figure for India to make them a piece of show...

First, whatever Indian doctrine is, the quantity and quality of India's nuclear force is far below the level that make Pakistan's nukes a show piece. Only 2 countries have that capability: USA and Russia. Second, Pakistan doesn't have tactical nukes. Again, the number of their warheads is too...

That is funny! USA was unable to stop India's victory in 1971, but somehow USA has become so powerful that India could not go to war to response Pakistan's attack now even though India becomes much powerful than 1971? I loves this part. You claim USA is the reason that India couldn't go to...

That proves my opinion: one nuclear power always tries to avoid fighting a war against another nuclear power. India had no problem getting into the war against Pakistan in 1971 because both of you were not nuclear power at the time. Today, you are having overwhelming superior conventional...

Well, maybe it is news to some Indians here: Pakistan government is 100% controlling every single part of her country. http://english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/world/2014/02/25/Why-Pakistan-is-on-the-verge-of-new-civil-war-.html http://www.dawn.com/news/1112032

So, India responded in 1971. But since then, based on India claim, Pakistan has been sabotage India all the time, where is the your response? When 911 happened, Americans started a war; When Vietnam started shooting on the border, Chinese started a war; When Georgia started killing her...

Don't you agree that "significant reason" is the massive consequence of a "potential nuclear war"? Yes, there is no death of "war". But every nuclear power shows great self-control in the confrontation with another nuclear power. Then, can you please tell why India hasn't done another 71 war...

Better read what the context is. The link provided by you said:" Terrorists trained in Pakistan" not "Pakistan trained", there is a big difference here.

Name me one war fought between 2 nuclear powers. According to Indians, Pakistan has been sabotaging India since 1971, why doesn't India make another 71 invasion? Of course, that is all you can say.

No, your people had the nuclear weapons in the mind from the beginning. No, NPT was not the problem. Your people didn't not see a nuclear umbrella as sufficient. You wanted your own nuclear force. No, I am suggesting that it was your own government holding all the necessary resources and...

Are you sure? Your nuclear project even started before Chinese. I hardly believe that was a result of 1965 war. You can't have both. The pre-condition for any nuclear umbrella from USA or USSR was signing NPT. If your opinion about India strategic thought is correct (which I agree), that...

Wash your mouth first. Obviously, your own government and armed forces doesn't agree with you. Did anyone talk about the legitimacy of Kashmir here? You can save your time. We are talking about the fact here: Pakistan is holding a part of Kashmir and they decide to keep it at any cost. No...

And at the meantime, turning down the offer of nuclear umbrella from Soviets? And killing this effort by rejecting NPT? If we check India's progress on the scale of 100, after 74 nuclear test, India already reached 90-95. Are you suggesting your scientists failed to cross the last 5-10 in 24...