Search results

  1. lookieloo

    Naval LCA Tejas

    In which case, I'm sure the DoD and General Atomics will be more than happy to evaluate the Mig-29K's potential for CATOBAR ops. All they need is a plane to closely examine... and the blueprints of course. :biggrin2:
  2. lookieloo

    Naval LCA Tejas

    No $hit it's only launched US aircraft. It's not our problem that you bought Russian carrier planes built for Russian carriers that don't have catapults. My understanding is that the Mig-29K was originally designed with the possibility of CATOBAR in-mind, but I don't know how much of than...
  3. lookieloo

    Naval LCA Tejas

    One internetz for well produced video, two internetz for beating F-35B onto the ski-jump. Feel free to rub a little UK face in that. Now... let's see a CATOBAR version.
  4. lookieloo

    Naval LCA Tejas

    Naval Rafale's wings don't fold either.
  5. lookieloo

    Naval LCA Tejas

    Against the scale of what large ships consume anyways, it makes little difference. Most of the CATOBAR carriers operated since the technology was developed have been conventionally powered. More relevant is fact that most warships these days tend to use gas rather than steam turbines, leaving...
  6. lookieloo

    Naval LCA Tejas

    That's about ship-size only and has nothing to do with CATOBAR capability. Fact is, far more CATOBAR ships have been built and operated without nuclear power than with it. That said, there has been speculation that sometime in the future, it may become cheaper for ships over ~40,000 tons to...
  7. lookieloo

    Naval LCA Tejas

    Can this be a sticky thread?
Top