Search results

Japanese ate Indian PoWs, used them as live targets in WWII Read more at: http://m.timesofindia.com/articleshow/40017577.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst...

This documentary is a good way to remind people of the unmatched and greatest human horror that the World has ever seen: And as I said in another thread it turned that the Philippines was one of the very few countries of Europe willing to accept European refugees prior to WW2. But our then...

There was no official British policy to intentionally starve Indian people for purpises of exterminating them. In fact, if there was a policy to kill Indians then why do it only in Bengal region after all the whole of the Indian subcontinent was under British rule? There were either no order or...

It still killing people.

The point of contention was the ability of the USSR to bounce back quickly from the devastation of WW2... my friend civfanatic was enthralled (I am too make no mistake about it) by this and he attributes it to the fact that the population of the USSR was not that badly depleted by Stalin's...

LOL! It may be true that the USSR did not formally annex those countries yet despite the semantics these countries were essentially controlled by the USSR. Note how the USSR responded when Hungarians attempted to move away from the Soviet axis...

Maybe you forgot the post WW2 absorption of Baltic states, Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and not to mention the pillage of NAZI stash/wealth from occupied territories... Stalin made his research well...

Ask Damian about Stalin... I thought this might be of special mention to the credit of Mr. Stalin: Katyn Massacre http://katyn.org.au/

Roosevelt D.? Truman? Eisenhower? Kennedy?... you know what I mean

Please elaborate on why he is evil to you...

Churchill ahead of Stalin? Yeah, Soviet orphans...