Search results

Sir, no point arguing with people who go off tangent. In any case it's the official policy of India to react to a nuclear strike with a massive retaliation. Point I made was having a strategic end point to the Pakistan problem. Bravado aside, we know that destroying Islamabad, Rawalpindi...

This thread is not for trolling. Be on topic. Just for your information, in the 60s though india and China were in a miserable state, Indian economy was better off.

Our nukes didn't make SL, BD, Nepal, Maldives go for nukes. It's the perpetual parity seeking Pakis who had to. You do not come under our radar. Except for when it comes to terror. We have our own plans for our country and its future.

Timeline is the next "26/11". International community will support India.

Answer is NEVER. It's your problem that you think Indian nukes are for Pak. Right at the outset, tr nukes were for China. The program began in right earnest after 62 war. We would have exploded a bomb in 66 after China did in 64 and this with the tacit US support it but we didnt have enough...

Pakistans arsenal is the Chinese CHIC-4. 10-12 KT. You can say yield wise it's all tactical. But then it's all intended for strategic role. Unless China has proliferated recently (which I suspect it has as Pak is developing Pu based bombs) Pakistan still has first gen kind of bombs.

This is not a troll thread. Really not interested in answering or allowing anyone else to divert the attention from the crux of the thread.

1) the point of the thread is primarily response to a Paki first strike. India has all options open after suffering a first strike. This thread explores a non nuclear response at least against Pak. Getting China into the picture will be a political decision. 2) Bangladesh liberation has...

Bull crap @minority appeasement.

While I like such articles which predict doom which helps the sleeping neta-babus, it's not going to happen. Call Pak bluff on nukes at the next available opportunity.

:facepalm:

We are not going to be an occupying force but more of a liberating force for the two Pakistani provinces that want independence and we we have to take back PoK. So for a short period we will be right there.

And we will kill millions of them with a no holds barred license to our armed forces.

Winning the war and a dismantled Pakistan will take care.

I you believe our country is weak to split during a war with Pak then I cannot help. Primary aim of India has to finish off Pakistan once they go nuke. Finish them as an entity. Remember you will not be able to wipe out the entire 180 million of them. we know the provinces that can go separate...

Your basic premise is wrong. Pak will go nuke when we get into their cities. That's their doctrine. I am not not advocating a retaliation. Just HOW it can be done is different. End goal is to win the war and on our terms with Pakistan as a state finished. Nuking them and leaving them alone...

Our troops will be in Pakistan. That is when they will go nuke. I don't want us to nuke our own troops. It's all about strategic objective. We can kill far more people with conventional weapons and achieve our goals. Its all about goals or objectives. If its just to glass the other side which...

You will be killed in a first strike by the enemy as mine is still what we do after a first strike. I don't propose the same with China where a nuke will beget a nuke.

It wasn't an order that I passed. Alternative thinking depending on what strategic goals india has for the next big war with Pakistan. Again, if it's beyond your scope of understanding is not my problem. Read that article and that thread again.

Son, nuclear weapons are not for war fighting. The west realized that long ago. Nuclear weapons are deterrents. They cease to be a deterrent once it's used.