Search results

Big Joke Irony is, AB section is where they failed & core is where they were successful in Kaveri

https://alphadefense.in/unleashing-the-potential-of-kaveri/

I really hope I knew that

we already have the technologies for 4th gen engine,we achieved 1728K TET with a DS Blade,with a SC blade it can achieve 1800K TET, what we need is more funding & test facilities to upgrade current Kaveri to 90KN thrust level.....for 5th gen engine we don't have the required technologies

51 KN was achieved long back, they derated it to 46KN for Ghatak, they can increase it to 56KN by improving LP Fan & LP Turbine...& if they managed to develop a new afterburner with 60% thrust increment, then it can achieve 89.6KN wet thurst, enough for Tejas-Mk1/1A

I copied this too from BRF People, don't cry in 2035, muh french took our money ree.....didn't give us tech ree ..... Postby maitya Ok Rakeshji, will try - being a Mango Abdul myself, my try will be as lay man as possible. But be aware, trying to infer/make-sense from the reports that gets...

Copied Maithya's post from BRF What a complete waste of an article - anytime he went to the technical aspects he got it completely wrong, as he never bothered to ask slightly more specific questions? But then expecting from DDM, is like ... What metallurgical tools, what rotating parts...

at 13:31 in the below video, he is claiming that there are plans to use 2 Kaveri engines on a twin engined fighter Grp Captain VN Jha says " We have got the alternative plans going on, in which 2 Kaveri engines will be used on twin engine aircraft, that concept is right now going on. I can't...

SKD assembly will give new technologies and skill sets, Lol🤣

because it will help us to validate our own indigenous DMS4 HPT, & its the most important of all If we are importing 100s of other components from outside, then why did you say F414 is some sort of gold for India??

Dei, how many times I have to say this?? I never said we should reverse engineer their core, hence we don't need their manufacturing "Know-why" I said we should try to replace F414s HPT with Indigenous HPT, & for that to happen, we need performance data of their HPT, combustor, HPC, Fan

You call SKD assembly of F414 as gold, lol :pound: we have manufactured AL-31F from raw material stage, its experience actually helped in development of DMS4 SCBs, this is what should be called as gold, not some SKD assembly.

I know they won't, but we should try to get it some how

Kaveri Dry Engine is Original Kaveri minus AB, that's it, it will prove the core of the Kaveri engine, Why do we need american blade composition when our own DMS4 is slightly better than their Rene N6? Did you even read what I have said earlier, I will repeat again, real carefully now "We...

I will not hesitate to do that I think they tested our TBCs on Al-31F & they worked great afaik That's why I said we need F414 core data...with it we can do it in less time We are only doing screwdrivergiri, we aren't gonna manufacture whole F414 from raw stage. Kaveri dry engine will be...

I know ,but our indigenous SCB is slightly better than F414's, we need F414 core related data, so that we can integrate our own indigenous HPT, if successful then we can be sanction free. I'm not saying that we should reverse engineer american HPT, I'm saying we should try to replace it with...

This is the most important thing here, if we are allowed to use our SCBs on the F414 & if they are successful, then its a great validation for our engine programme I'm not saying that we should use our blades on every engine, I'm saying we should try it on one or two engines for some...

Mig-29 has another problem, it has conventional flight controls, if the test engine fails, its difficult to control it