Search results

It is just a movie. What does historical evidence say in this matter? If Bajirao really died for the woman then he was a bit stupid.

It was complement for the fact that she put here about the dance forms. But that does not change the fact that Islamist, communists and feminists bunch together every now and then to ban free speech. At least I do not have double standards there.

These are the same people who want to disown naked paintings all over Indian temples!!

If you ego is so weak that it gets hurt by a stupid movie than such people should suckle their mama and stay in their homes. People are getting hurt all the time these days. They should write articles and put down explanations like @Rashna did rather than get offended. They can counter it...

Good info. Still it is Bhansali movie and has to be high on emotions rather than factual accuracy. If you don't like it just don't watch the movie- it is not that difficult.

What is the wrong message? That dancing is bad? It is just a movie and that too stupid Bhansali brand. You must be naive to take him seriously.

Did you go and see Royal ladies not dancing? They would probably not do mujra in front of 1000 people but they can do whatever they want in their private lives. Art and dance were learnt by many royal woman in the past.

Not a big of Bhansali. I have read the film is too long which makes it boring.