Search results

Re: Lack of preparedness, intelligence failure led to 1962 war defeat: Nehru was comfortable with people who was likeminded. He suffered!

This is what upsets the rest of India. The Union Govt is total North India centric. Even when the onion prices were high, Pak onions were for Delhi! As if Delhi is India!!

I would not say coward PM. He is a pacifist and prone to compromise for his peace of mind. Ifs and buts won't change the situation. The moment is NOW. and the situation is very woolly woolly. Na ki athhey, na ki othey!

P2P, You cannot statistically analyse a battle or a campaign. There are too many imponderable that statistical models or raw statistics cannot take into account.

India lost out owing to pu*ssyfooting. In the 50s, China was preoccupied with the Korean War, which was important to her since it would bring a belligerent US at the border. India could have exerted her influence in Tibet. China would have been divided in intent and would not be able to exploit...

P2P, Warfare is complex. There is no single template for victory. It depends on the Situation.

My personal opinion is that air power itself will not be able to win wars.

This will give you an effect of air power THE UNITED STATES STRATEGIC BOMBING SURVEY http://www.anesi.com/ussbs02.htm

Can Air Power Alone Win a War? Bruce GottliebPosted Wednesday, April 14, 1999, at 6:21 PM ET Many pundits are criticizing the NATO airstrikes. An argument you often hear is that "Air strikes alone never work." Is this really true? Most military historians (at least those not employed by the...

Any campaign is won, not by an single Service. It is won by a synergy effected by jointmanship. The Air Force has a clear cut task and so has the Army and Navy. Yet, all have to work in tandem complementing each other to achieve the tactical and the strategic aim.