Kind of..
It took off with assumed 21T mtow from landbased ramp in Goa. Maybe if A.C. is sailing at 25 knots it can add 1T more. But yeah not having catapult surely affects MTOW which is 24.5T for Rafale-M.
Barak-8 will be intercepting from the front not chasing it from behind.
Think logically before you type.
Looks like chinese are also suffering from shallow knowledge like their Paki brethren.
That's why we should buy Rafale.
Rafale is 15m long vs 18m of F-18
So as per rough guestimate , We might be able to put 18 Rafales in the space of 15 F-18SH.
Vikrant could carry 30 planes.
5-6 V22 some refueler ,some awacs. Dump kamov.
20+ Rafale seems a good power punch.
True.. i am not the one worried about US sanctions.
We can buy long term spares similarly for osprey if our next carrier is Stobar, or Hawkeye e-2 if next is Catobar. If we dont FK up the lift size
No. Why so much worried about sanctions ??
Did we think about it while buying Poseidon, Globmaster , superhercules , Chinook, Apache, Vikrant's GE turbines, GE engines for LCA , MK2 , AMCA ??
It's better to fly 1 mig29k and refuel 2 NLCA instead of flying 3 mig29k.
Mig29k internal can carry 5.4t + 2-3t external .
That's like normal payload of internal+ weapons.
It can re-fuel plenty , if probe is installed into NLCA.
Mig29k might take up 2.5T for 1 hr flight around 600kmph, rest...
That will require us to make 5-6 carriers.
Better dedicate a supersize Submarine class and paint Tiger on the subamrine's tower like German Wolfpack U-boats 😍😍
Tedbf thread is kinda dead , so asking here.
Can folded wings carry same payload had they been non foldable wings ??
Also why 7.6m ? Feels too low for our any lift acting as bottleneck.