Search results

Every move is a cost-benefit analysis. Turning a country into a desert is likely to be a long process, we are building the infrastructure required for it, while we have some already in place. Governments change, times change, strategies change. Neither you nor I really know what GoI's real...

Yup because it would have been so wise to trust the 'sincere' move, what a silly point. It was probably the only sane thing Nehru did. Its irrelevant who's to blame for the relationships, we only care about our interests, Pak's interests are immaterial to us. We have many cards including control...

Their unity with terror outfits and funds from islamic countries is inconsequential. The conventional disparity is greater than it ever has been and considering none of this made any difference when Pakis lost all wars, it is not going to matter much now. There is no amity possible as long as...

You should actually be more worried about Paki's ability to respond considering that they don't even seem to be capable of successfully carrying out their zarb-e-nonsense given the recent attack on their air base/camp among the numerous ones that regularly take place across Pakland.

I said they are irrational if they ever launch their nukes. Its not a matter of evil, thats just relative and frankly immaterial. There is nothing to suggest that the Paki elite would care for any religious Umma or whatever, self and national interest comes above all else. Sacrificing self for...

I believe you have posted this earlier - not the letter, but the gist of it before while discussing Paki nukes. My simple question, why do you believe the Paki generals care about anything beyond their self and country? if they are retarded enough to commit suicide by launching weapons that...

That's the only reasonable and sustainable final solution for our Paki woes; unfortunately, its not something achieved in a hurry and most of the steps towards that can't by necessity be public - which is a key element of any GoI response to a large scale terror attack on India, particularly...

One of the key aspects of CSD as I understand it is to be quick and achieve tactical goal, in this case grabbing critical land before the world reacts. Once, that is met, we can agree to a cease-fire and bargain with the land captured. The target for attack can be debated upon and in my sense it...

What can these surgical strikes achieve that cannot be rebuilt? Such strikes make for good publicity but don't serve much real purpose when the state apparatus is creating these 'strategic assets'. I'd much rather we mobilize forces quickly, CSD or whatever the latest doctrine is and capture...