Search results

Never try to reason with a pork , it's like wrestling with a pig , you get dirty and pig likes it . Secondly for using a ir Missile as a irst ,you need the seeker to be good enough , second two way communication for sharing info . Third it would be depleting missile shelf life heavily

Single seater

One thing i noted in Chinese system is they make them thick and bulky af , based on Russian designs . Indian designs have evolved to more European type now

one is shady in its data other is more publicized , one is sfdr other is dual pulse . on a side note: which chick is in your dp ??

kid on forum and about maws , it is near cockpit near wing root , others are yet to be spotted

That's what I am saying , Better to have prior info on what u wanna discuss , these claims of youra are already discussed years ago ,start reading drdo psu thread , Astra thread , and don't post without reading threads from start to end

Why does it matter ,and are u a engineer to be damn sure , i said earlier ,will say it again , read more than u write , until u have some exclusive info which nobody have written on the thread .

Possibly , and if yes , then what ? Technical espionage is a real thing

Yep , tejas mk 2 has lotof similarities with tejas mk 1 , so the induction and testing procedure have been shortened , the design phase for the modification for a heavier aircraft as per iaf was started in 2018 , compared to others it is lesser time .

No ioc , first aircraft in prototype will be near production standard , it will be direct foc

It is a old bird will be replaced by tejas mk2 in late 2020's

Meteor maybe integrated

Military secret ,engine efficiency is open info , fuel capacity is a open info ,that gives a rough idea of it's capability ,it can't be flown for more than 300 km radius ,that too with light aam loadout , nothing more than that , it's basically a point defence fighter , it can atmost reach...

What are combat radius of jf 17 , what is load bearing of its wing ,what are structural compromise Pakistan is doing due to lack of proper manufacturing capability as compared to china , how good are it's fbw system ,what kind of actuator it uses , how good is it's aerodynamic , how potent are...

Possible but thing is we are going to develop in next decade and deal with Argentina will mught develop some problem but hope things don't turn out so , if india Argentina gets the deal right ,you will be in best situation as the upcoming tedbf and amca would reduce logistics menace . Also...

It can but still engine will the last as we are going for jv with RR for engine for our next gen fighter

We could have trued for export ,but our next gen engine us a co deveolpment with Britain and some more item are British , so no scope right now but when engine is made we may try to export tedbf , will be perfect for your country , twin engine , multirole , but it's long in future

Jf 17 is not too bad for a peacetime country for just hanger queens but if you are facing british , it's not the right deal . @Roland55 aerodynamic compromise in jf 17 may harm it's missile launching capability , at high g it may not launch missile

Okay jf 17 is good . For tejas as a target to shoot down

First of first a non technological argument , if jf 17 was good why plaf didn't inducted it , operational requirement for light fighter was always there is plaf , your beauty j 10 , has short comings like availability rate ,while you are defending jf 17 , a inferior jet with unreliable engine ...