Search results

At .2 kilotons even many conventional weapons are more lethal. A useless weapon with a idiotic doctrine .

@Screambowl @tarunraju I agree with your opinion of having a second strike policy is the best option. Pakistan's first strike if successful may do minimal damage but it will be a good excuse for a totally annihilating indian second strike.

With a 60 km sub sonic sub kiloton missile is a bigger threat to Pakistan than india. Most likely will be easily intercepted or land within Pakistani territory.

With no fissile material ? Are you still using yellowcake method? Takes five years for 1 warhead.

Can you provide a link from a neutral source?

This would be from a four missile salvo nasr missile is .5-5 kilotons from neutral source. So I will say 2.5 kiloton and four missiles so I got 10 kilotons which still maybe generous? Strategically speaking no compotent general or military planner would use this pos missile.

With a 60km range and official .5-5 kiloton yield this missile is more or less useless. This a Chinese Smerch copy claimed to be mated with a nuclear warhead ? Does Pakistan have miniaturization capability?

@bengalraider I doubt we will go for mega tonnage we are more focused on MIRV 's. One large splat or many precise deadly strikes?

21 warheads from 3 reactors in 5 years is a big threat? If the fast breeders are on schedule I have heard numbers of upto 700 warheads possible annually. For India But let Pakistan enjoy their missile .which by it's size would be about 10 kiloton yield IMO.(from a 4 missile salvo) Pakistan does...