Search results

As your wish. :p I use desi mal only. BTW, you are ought to tell about your own country while arguing with Indians.

Probably will discuss after test of A6. 2017. :D

@rockey 71 bro, what's your task here. Do you even understand the meaning of that Science which you have liked? :biggrin2: I would love to know about some Bangladeshi missiles.

Surya missile has a speculated Speed of Mach24. And K-5 is it's SLBM variant. :hmm:

Tell this to your friend Chinese. They barely design anything at home. :biggrin2: Indigenous means originated from own country. From design to manufacturing. Obviously, you do believe that Indian Weapons aren't indigenous. This is a newly generated rant because some guys with inferiority...

It's not our own. It's from UNO and some of best agencies around world who detect only watchable. So, these countries can have only more than it's seeming, not less. And who knows BD may also be hiding nukes somewhere? :party: There's a limit of telling lie. :doh: Vidhvansak INSAS Kalantak...

That's the funniest joke which made my day. :D If Indian program wasn't indigenous, how did India built FBRs, advanced particle accelerators, quantum labs and world's first Thorium Reactor (working on second fusion reactor as well.) And what about pakis if not NoKos? Are they ahead of us? :D...

My mistakes weren't intentional. Making such mistakes during typing long posts. I know I wrote Sweden as swedend and started word "country" with small letter after full stop. I would be interested to know about other mistakes if I made. And these mistakes are so small not even worth...

What's your task on this thread? Does Bangladesh has nuclear weapons. You have made any mistakes. Let's correct. India has more than 10 times nukes of N.Korea. Agni-6, Wikipedia - The Free Encyclopedia Surya Missile- Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Now, USA- 4500 Russia - 4700 UK- 215...

But I'm still not much happy. Just being centred one country isn't a matter of pride I guess. So, I think it's too early to celebrate. Nor I'm much happy with US collaboration First that California Textbook Issue, then, their concerns over Indian Missile tests and then, steps against...

Whatever you read or not, please read reddened portion at least. Let's start Yet I also agree we initially used Canadian fissile material. Later developed itself. Pokhran-II wasn't a complete failure. BTW, Reason: nobody was licensed to test in 74, India even then did tests. Or Tell me...

Wait a minute. O.o I have dropped that native and 100% indigenous claim(Doesn't change fact that China also received help from Soviets) But being a Fourth World and attentionless country unlike getting too much noticed like us when everybody specially tries to neutralize you. Even today, US is...

If I go by that logic, INS Arihant would be operational today. :peace: By the way, post your that thread soon which we were talking about.

Again my point, India faced a great diplomatic trouble in 74. After that, India's nuclear program has always been under eyes of UN for years. Even after that, India did tests in 98. And once again, recent developments in civilian sector adds more plus point on our account. You are calling our...

Do you have any update on K-5. It's range could be upto 10000km. Equal to Trident.

Delete your duplicate posts. BTW, 1974 was a small cracker. But if you know 1998, there were 5 nuclear tests together and that even underground, so some yield absorbed by ground and simultaneous tests created problem in calculating actual yield. This was explained in every report (including...

Probably which you have posted on PDF I guess. Agree on American hypocrisy. Somebody expressed "concerns" because India has enough material for 1,000 nukes (like India has nothing else to do with nuclear material except bombs :D ). There was a rumour ofIndian Nuclear city for developing...

@Martian I heard on an American site that you guys have 3000 nukes. Is that true? :D