Search results

One can choose but one of the two countries is going to be lied to. I'm saying no need to leave that open. . Disagree. Imo, it's fine as it is.

Ideological standpoint is absolutely necessary for a nation. Otherwise we can just stop wasting money and men and line up to kiss the arse of whoever citing practicality.

Look, this isn't personal. I have made my position on this as clearly as I can. I understand this is personal for you and I see no benefit in joining issue with you when my position is more general. I will stop with my arguments on this unless I feel there is a specific point on which I need...

That's an convenient opinion, I'm afraid. India's position on citizenship is known before an applicant moves for taking another country's citizenship. That is a choice made, whether with a heavy heart or a light one.

A fair ask for which country? Why should the other agree to be a 2nd choice? If every nation asked that question, one of them is being lied to.

India is not Israel, Israel was a country made for Jewish people of the world, hence the open invitation. We can do without the "Israeli" level of support. OCI level of support is sufficient. We didn't close the door, the door was closed by the individuals concerned. This argument can also be...

Specific to this point, if one has taken an oath of allegiance of another country and that usually requires forsaking any other allegiance, why should people in India trust anyone for whom... A) The oath of allegiance means nothing (the corollary being that the person may have no strong...

Nope. No dual citizenship. It is a choice made to give up Indian citizenship. Don't confuse NRI's with foreign citizens of Indian origin. NRI's are Indian citizens living abroad. Regardless of how an individual may feel about India and some may have a deep connection, giving dual citizenship...