Search results

Ok So I accept your Flawed logic and i ignore the citation of authenticated sources of west and reputed international organizations. I think now that should make you happy. Right?

http://www.businessinsider.in/Nine-Nations-Have-Nukes-Heres-How-Many-Each-Country-Has/articleshow/36724379.cms

Look , recently pakistan said that India has the materiel to make 2000 bombs. I can site that. However, we have to go by most authentic source in today's scenario. It is wester which states the N Bomb numbers of various N countries as US & Russia 4000 to 5000 UK 450 France 280 to 300 China 230...

provide the reference. Or else I can provide you the numbers of international reference of china having 230 to 250 N Bombs.

So as let me take the latest figures of chinese nuclear weapons today which is 230 (As per western source). So chinese bomb should have an average yield of 2 MT. Ohhhhh My go . Even US and Russia will envy.

Ohhhh I quote from articles still it is fake and if you say that China had 465 MT H bombs way back in 1990s , we should believe it. Most of international papers and study cites chinese N Bomb number to 230 against 100 of india and 110 of pakistan in 2014 or 2015. If i assume that china had...

Previous test was for 3500 Km range with same accuracy.

When it says that near Zero CEP that does it it make any difference whether it hit at 5 m distance or 10 meter distance on 20 m distance when it carries 2+ ton payload?

If i can provide you a source of Agni V hitting target within 2 digit accuracy at 5000 Km + range than is it OK? As i stated the last test of K 4 was at 700 KM and one carried out on 7th March was at full range. So do not repeatedly argue that K4 travels just 420 miles. It was a short range...

It is relevenat to compare both missile as both are SLBM and designed to deliver warhead on enemy. The fact of the matter is that k4 is such an accurate missile that none of the chinese missile can match it. It is designed to deliver a huge conventional and non conventional payload on enemy...

BS You do not have any understanding of K4 sort of missile and purely basaltic missile. Our Agni 5 travels at Mach 24 in its terminal phase much faster than anything china have. K4 never lives atmosphere and travel in depressed trajectory. Chinese Boost glide vehicle is mounter on ballistic...

@Martian Look, I was talking about K 4 yesterday and it is tested with almost Zero CEP today. This is the difference between your Junk technology with 500 M CEP and our missile bang on target ..http://idrw.org . Read more at India's No 1 Defence News Website and not at Copycat Websites ...

They are 30 years behind us in FBR technology. Their program and reactors are just shit so as their nuclear weapon. They do not know what is FBR. As one american think tank had pointed out , Indian Nuclear program is most diverse. We have application of nuclear technology in all area. Most...

We should tell them that We have demolished your Missile technology control regime long ago. Your opposition have no value for us and we shall push our program further with greater zeal if you oppose. It is you who need us more than we need you. Just make a statement that If you want to produce...

Within short span of 1 and half year. Modi has taught them many lesson. Their string of pearl is dismantled. They tried to do a UPA like mischief and that watch tower destroyed without any warning. We are supplying Brahmos to Vietnam and building relationship with FIjji, and Philippines. They...

All chinese missile test are always successful. I challenge you to quote any news of failure of chinese missile test. Your missile test results are to impress your domestic audience and hence always successful. Had you had 2 successful test in 2008, JL 2 would have been operational by now.

Anything may look anything to you. You chinese have the habit of looking so many great thing in your BS weapons.The important thing is what is quoted in authentic source and not something which looked something to you. Fact of the matter is that JL 2 has not got IOC till date. I challenge you to...

Fact: This is not fact. The fact is that we had the capability to design build very compact H bomb in eighties. We tested a H bomb with low yield (Deliberately kept low) in 1998. Fact 2: We are designing Big H bomb of 5 MT scale now. (Or might have completed and build 5 MT H Bomb by now)...

INS arihant has completed all trials. FOC announcement is just an administrative call. On Other hand JL 2 was not granted IOC till 2014.

You can say anything. It is the habbit of you guys. I quote that IOC was not granted till 2013 and it is from The 2013 Report To Congress Of The U.S.-China Economic And Security Review Commission. now give rest to your lies and hypes which has no basis. JL 2 is just like your planes who are...