Search results

  1. Guest

    JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 Xiaolong

    Israelis with all their EW and Counter measures system and then some more from Raytheon, have been failing miserably at It, But yeah look at this madarsa chap, open his leather bag of a mouth here.
  2. Guest

    JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 Xiaolong

    Let's assume, the ZDK-03 and Erieye is able to see the CBG from 400 km away, If they at all survive the internal jihadi officers of PAF and PN who are ever ready to blow up surveillance planes like P-3 Orions, Erieye etc and kidnap Frigates to do Jihad. What will that seeing do ? still have to...
  3. Guest

    JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 Xiaolong

    Brahmos is much more than Yakhont++ comparing the two is like comparing Su27 with Su35 since both have same origins. Brahmos has been tested at 10 meter high flight path for 120km in Low, Low, Low mode. Use the same thinking in case of Carrier Battle group defense of India. I never said the...
  4. Guest

    JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 Xiaolong

    Barak's range is 100km, It has been tested upto 90km. So the 90km figure I quoted for a high flying object is conservative. It has the capability to perform maneuvers at 80G much better than the Chinese S-300 series copies capable of 40G. So If a Chinese missile can shoot down Brahmos, flying...
  5. Guest

    JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 Xiaolong

    How does Chinese Ships defend against a 290km Brahmos, or 450km one ? And what is behind this dumb logic that the interceptor has to be always present near the target. The whole reason behind area defense is neutrality of huge areas in air, a 90km range Barak 8 means, 90 km radius circles...
  6. Guest

    JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 Xiaolong

    55555555555555555555555555
  7. Guest

    JF-17 Thunder / FC-1 Xiaolong

    And what would be the size of such seeker--:rolleyes: Other than that AFA thermal cameras are concerned they need to be much cooler than the object they are going to detect-- how does the hypersonic missile maintain such low temperature moving in a dense atmosphere-:confused:
Top