Search results

I guess the intended nuclear tip is a bluff to deter the cold start. Looks like they did not clear the basic observable flaws in their fluke. Even then, it is a threat with a conventional warhead.

Zarvan buddy, please talk sense What in hell is the logic of initiating a suicide mission with this stupid idea of nuking forward Indian forces as a first strike just to stop an Indian advance? Is that your confidence in your conventional warfare abilities? Even if you hurt India a lot in this...

You made a valid point sir. However my point is that we include a discussion of what options we have to prevent a Nasr nuke. We do not want to loose our men in the event that Pakistan looses its head entirely.

Discuss ways and means of preventing a Nasr from nuking us. You think your "psychological pressure" acting on a P.C. guy from Lahore is going to deter the Pakistan Army Strategic Command from launching a Nasr? Alright, how about this, discuss how we can prevent a Nasr from nuking us and that...

If the other guy is a lunatic, then maybe you should not try and draw confidence from the fact that you can slap him. Rather you should try and think of a way that makes sure his slap(nuclear 1st strike using Nasr) does not hurt you in the first place. I am merely trying to stop this pointless...

Everyone here seems intent on killing the point in this discussion.

This "we nuke you if you nuke us" argument has been going on for quite a while now. It does not solve any purpose. :blah: Are we not forgetting that this discussion was about the Nasr missile? Lets take a deep breath and calm down. If you are a Pakistani and reading this: What in hell is the...