Search results

It is sloped sir .if it is not for slope then why didn't they place era. Parrel to surface which would have saved weight by reduseing era use in armor.sorry slope armour was,is,and will be relevant in armour production

DRDO should start a pilot project for new turrent which is suitable for all our tank model with existing kanchen armour covered with era and gun scope placed above gun like one k2 or challenger2 which can be use for upgrading old tank t72 and arjun mark 1 and even mark 2 in future

Sir in my post I s told that turrent should be replace with new turrent similar to markava 4 or centurian2

Both of this tank look like mouth with broken teeth. Most of us will not like this comment but I have some reason for that mk1 can with stand kinatic round like long tungsten rod by using honey comb structure in it .we can optimic it with thick layer of high dense materials like tungsten or...

We are not chatting about tanks rear it is the turrent front .if you need better understanding learn about Abrams MBT.

Sir I am a commen men Does adding some metal and era side with large opening in front will help the tank to performance better this is the stupid idea and desine a desine would have ever made. What is that we have in end. addition of weight with unsloped armor in front.our tank designer should...

Once again same question turrent front is the place which take most of hits from enemy tank if you can't have a protective armour for your cheast why do you need to protection for your back

Sorry sir markava is the tank which is designed for survivability to protect its cruse .and what is your opinion on large weak spot in that picture I have pasted.in markava 4 the gun site is placed above turrent and main gun holder in arjun is not sloped which is a big flaw.

Still arjun turrent front is badly engineered Gun site and gun easy target for enimy tank so there Is no use in protecting other place with large weak spot in front We should replace the turrent with turrent similar to markava 4 turrent .