Search results

Your query was about metallurgy for high pressure gun barrels. So the example of Dhanush and ATAGS is relevant. Anyway, as I mentioned even if Pakistan manages to get some it will be so few that it can be easily tackled in an asymmetric fashion. There is no need to invest huge cost to tackle a...

If we can make Dhanush and ATAGS then don't you think our knowledge of metallurgy is not that outdated?

Pakistan and 'buying' don't go together. More like 'begging' and beggars can't be choosers. Even if they get some it will be so few in numbers that it can be easily tackled by ATGM teams/ RCL teams etc.

We are not fighting European or Russian tanks, we are fighting Pakistani tanks and so the penetration is good enough. There is a cost too for the higher penetrating sabots. If the target does not require them why should we spend money to make them.

Bridges in India are not the problem. There is enough infra in India to support 70ton tanks. Army has a problem with bridges in Pakistan. As per them it is not strong enough. But with CPEC that problem is solved too. Pak's infra will be upgraded and so making it easier for Indian tanks. Thank...