Search results

Russians are not much the fool as you thought n their fighters jets are most feared by westerner; there were some reasons behind that; item 30 will be mature sooner than you thought; it is another viable option India has if Westerners sabotaged India's turbofan engine dream.

India should develop another turbofan engine in collaboration with Russian based on item 30. On the other hand India should continue r&d on high end metallurgy for hot core beside setting up of high altitude testing facilities and procurement of test bed aircrafts. Otherwise India may end up...

Oh really then it will be a good developmment. Better we do not put all the eggs on uncle sam's basket.

Forget japanese they rarely share their high end techs since the defeats in the 2nd ww.

In addition we have to established a high altitue engine testing facilities in india like gromov and procure twin engine test beds also.

What are the other options if western country backoffs from 110 kn engine for amca? Gurus pls illuminate.

Has metal cutting started? ....

U never know, dont put all your eggs on the same basket.

We indian are silly, while craving for western technology sacrifices the ruskies. Su35 is a potent weapon platform feared by westerners but still we have a problem with it here n there, the same is the case with su57 because we go by what the dalals say. If uncle sam sanctions the whole programs...

Positioning of canards and shape and size of the air intakes matter a lot in designing a combat aircraft. The main changes made in MWF from its base line aircraft are the addition of canards and changes that have to made on the shape and sizes of the air intakes in order to cater the needs of...

Nobody will transfer any high end technology know how to you unless you achieve some breakthrough in that area. The breakthrough will be achieved only when you do rigorous r&d. Whenever you are on the verge of achieving a breakthrough they will offer you transfer of technology of a similar level...

Why don't they incorporated a retractable one instead of protruding refueling prob still despite knowing that it increases frontal RCS of the aircraft? Are they aping the French or the European one blindly? That's correct when they say mk 1 has space constraints but that's not in the case of mk 2.

Mk 1 does not have have retractable one due space constraints but we should have on mwf or tedbf because it will frontal RCS of the aircraft.

Astra mk 2 has two version one is dual pulse and other one is ramjet powered.....

Let the plane come sooner than later with any name ........

F##k up everything indegeneous...kill the mwf by buying f21 ## the old gal with lipstick ## buy more Raphael to fuck amca/orca....the paper planes.....fed up of seeing mock up.

Ex Naval chief opines on Tejas.. https://theprint.in/opinion/heres-why-ex-navy-chief-wants-indias-next-raksha-mantri-to-personally-guide-tejas/241105/ Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk

Has the initial powerplant for mwf arrived? Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk

Still it has protruding refueling probe instead of retractable one!? Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using Tapatalk

Drdo/ADA are fools like us if they don't know how to feature a canard on a stretched aircraft with same wing shape and size. In NLCA there is no space for canard so there is LEVCON. In NLCA MK2 and its AF version there is ample space for incorporating either canard or LEVCON because of its...