Search results

PLZ-05 range is 100 km with assist WS-35 shell. Yes I wish them good luck which I have all my life but they don't have much to show for- yet!

Once we do this and that is not even good argument .. So for you, this is the best you will get

"It lags Chinese" is like saying does LCA lag Rafale? We haven't built a single piece of artillery and now claim our prototype is best in the world without a single product in operation! How ridiculous that sounds. Think about it. China is way ahead of India in defense tech as of now- there is...

Then I hope you wake up from your wet dreams

Your logic for Mig versus F-35 gives me the impression that you understand little on defense. Bye

Yes, also AH-4 is only 4500 kg and 155/39 cal hence the range difference. It is for mountains where 16 ton ATAGS can't go

ATAGS on mountain?! Lol. How do you plan to put 16 ton peiece of artillery on top of mountain? Please explain. AirDrop from C-17 ? lol. There's a reason India wants M-777- TO COUNTER CHINESE at LAC. ATAGS can only go as far as Bofors could. Anyway I am done with you and your silly discussion...

Finally some sane discussion. Thanks. Larger chamber means more propellant but doesn't always mean more range. For instance, Bofors FH-77 has more propellant but less range than G-5 mainly due to design of the shell and barrel. Also, more propellant means shorter barrel life. All these issues...

Is AH-4 SPH, Lallu? Artillery transportation is dependent on transport available to the enemy- Chinese have doctrine of having all new tracked artillery only. Denel G-5 is mounted on tank chassis and called G-6 - it doesn't take away anything from gun technology. How do you plan to move your...

And F-35 is operational means it has real world data- not just a test range data like you claim with ATAGS. Also, stay on topic- answer point to point instead of giving dismissive answers.

Off topic?! People on this forum are calling ATAGS superior to ANY Western or Chinese artillery without a single piece in operation! Chinese artillery development is world renowned. PLZ-45 is a design derived from Gerard Bull himself. It's widely exported and even used by Saudi Army (they have...

Go rant in front of some faltu guy, not here. Technology is the reason Europeans ruled us for 200 years- not because of lack of courage on our part. If China is ahead in weapon tech any war will be paid with Itna dar gaya 2-3 post padhke? Jaa be, tera poora post hi bakwas hai. Ja Kam Kar

It's sad that instead of accepting truth, you are going in tangent about inferiority complex route. In real war, equipment matter not lip service. Going to war with adversary like China without knowing true capacity of its warfighter is plain silly. Can't believe you make such statements!