Why is India lagging behind China ?

[mikhail]

I think that is because Indians are not working as hard as Chinese. You work less so you earn less. That is all.

we don't need a CCCP brainwashed 50 center to give us advice regarding hard labor.instead of advicing us i think that you should oil your own machine i.e give your utter nonsense advice to your own people in chiniland aka fairyland

 

[no smoking]

Very silly thing to say. Why is North Korea behind South Korea? Because North koreans are not hard workers? Say that to the North Koreans who do backbreaking work in the fields, all year round.

Tell the Indians who labour on construction sites, in farms, in the armed forces, in white collar jobs, that they don't work hard enough!! What nonsense!

Why was China doing so terribly in Mao's time? Did Chinese magically start working hard in 1979, all of a sudden?

I've said this many times, and I say it again: nations are built by systems and processes, good governance structures. A good governance structure and good economic policies and systems make nations great. Think of the difference between West and East Germany. Essentially the same people, but so vastly different in economic power. Why? Because of the difference in systems and governance structures.

Kindly desist from making silly statements.

Obiviously, North koreans doesn't work hard as their brothers in the south. At least, in factory, their working speed is far below the Chinese worker while Chnese workers are slower than Korean workers.

Regarding the indian labors, there are a lot of Chinese who were sent to india for contract complaining about them especially in construction:
1. They rarelly do overtime work;
2. There are too many holidays;
3. Lack of reponsibilities;
4. Lack of initiation;
5. Their rest time is rediculously long;
6. Lack of necessary skills: everytime chinese get someone trained for a certain job, he is usally moved away to do new things and a new one is coming as a request of union. As a result, neither of them learn anything;
7. Terriable organisation: i.e. chinese have 3 position for 3 unskilled persons, but the union sent them 3 persons for each position. When they decided to send the extra 6 back with full payment, union regarded it as kind of insultation;

And actually, in Mao's period, China's industrilization was at least not slower than today. And the chinese in that period-our parents generally think that we are not working hard enough!

Yes, the system is one of the keys. But that is only one side of problem: if after 60 years, you have been unable to change a system which clearly shows unsuitable for the task, you have to go deeper!

 

[afako]

As Long as we got the Stupid Feudal North Indian Submissive Mentality ruling the country from delhi with Congress at the helm who Don't Know a Shit of What Industrialization and Modernization means, India will never be able to Reclaim her Glory back.

 

[Armand2REP]

1.d. The democratic tatters like 'strike', 'bandh', 'demonstrations/ rallies' etc. are not found in China.

Is that a joke? There are more protests and strikes in China than on any country on the planet.

 

[ice berg]

Is that a joke? There are more protests and strikes in China than on any country on the planet.

No kidding, Sherlock. China is also the most populous country in the world.

 

[Bangalorean]

Obiviously, North koreans doesn't work hard as their brothers in the south. At least, in factory, their working speed is far below the Chinese worker while Chnese workers are slower than Korean workers.

Regarding the indian labors, there are a lot of Chinese who were sent to india for contract complaining about them especially in construction:
1. They rarelly do overtime work;
2. There are too many holidays;
3. Lack of reponsibilities;
4. Lack of initiation;
5. Their rest time is rediculously long;
6. Lack of necessary skills: everytime chinese get someone trained for a certain job, he is usally moved away to do new things and a new one is coming as a request of union. As a result, neither of them learn anything;
7. Terriable organisation: i.e. chinese have 3 position for 3 unskilled persons, but the union sent them 3 persons for each position. When they decided to send the extra 6 back with full payment, union regarded it as kind of insultation;

And actually, in Mao's period, China's industrilization was at least not slower than today. And the chinese in that period-our parents generally think that we are not working hard enough!

Yes, the system is one of the keys. But that is only one side of problem: if after 60 years, you have been unable to change a system which clearly shows unsuitable for the task, you have to go deeper!

This is utter bollocks.

So, Chinese work less hard than Japanese, Americans, than Singaporeans, than Swiss, than Germans. That is the root cause of China's backwardness. QED.

This juvenile thinking that "people are not hard working enough, so the nation is not far enough ahead", is a teenage fantasy.

Think of a farm in India, where a family of 6 people does backbreaking labour the whole day in the fields. Their womenfolk get up at 4 AM to walk 5 km to fetch water, and then cook food for the whole family. Are they "working hard" or not? Only an idiot will say that they are not working hard.

Now, if this family had mechanized tools for farming, two persons could do the work of 6, with much less effort, and leisure time to spare. Were the people working harder before, or now? Simple common sense. And if the village were to be provided with running water, the women will not have to work as hard anymore.

And the remaining four men of the house can now open a store, move to the city to work, start a small business, do much more. They can incorporate more productivity in the economy.

And yet, they are not working as hard now, as they were before. Your juvenile logic does not fit in here anymore.

You say that India has not been able to change a system after 60 years? We have been changing the system since 1991, and continue to do so. Only an idiot will look at it as a one-point one-shot "change" that will magically change the nation.

Tell me, China is still a third world nation after 60+ years. You people need to "go deeper" and understand that you people don't work hard enough. The fault is with the common Chinese person, who is lazy, that is the only reason China has not made progress to the level of Japan and the West.

Huh - it sounds too dump even to be typing this shit.

 

[Bangalorean]

Obiviously, North koreans doesn't work hard as their brothers in the south. At least, in factory, their working speed is far below the Chinese worker while Chnese workers are slower than Korean workers.

Regarding the indian labors, there are a lot of Chinese who were sent to india for contract complaining about them especially in construction:
1. They rarelly do overtime work;
2. There are too many holidays;
3. Lack of reponsibilities;
4. Lack of initiation;
5. Their rest time is rediculously long;
6. Lack of necessary skills: everytime chinese get someone trained for a certain job, he is usally moved away to do new things and a new one is coming as a request of union. As a result, neither of them learn anything;
7. Terriable organisation: i.e. chinese have 3 position for 3 unskilled persons, but the union sent them 3 persons for each position. When they decided to send the extra 6 back with full payment, union regarded it as kind of insultation;

And actually, in Mao's period, China's industrilization was at least not slower than today. And the chinese in that period-our parents generally think that we are not working hard enough!

Yes, the system is one of the keys. But that is only one side of problem: if after 60 years, you have been unable to change a system which clearly shows unsuitable for the task, you have to go deeper!

This is utter bollocks.

So, Chinese work less hard than Japanese, Americans, than Singaporeans, than Swiss, than Germans. That is the root cause of China's backwardness. QED.

This juvenile thinking that "people are not hard working enough, so the nation is not far enough ahead", is a teenage fantasy.

Think of a farm in India, where a family of 6 people does backbreaking labour the whole day in the fields. Their womenfolk get up at 4 AM to walk 5 km to fetch water, and then cook food for the whole family. Are they "working hard" or not? Only an idiot will say that they are not working hard.

Now, if this family had mechanized tools for farming, two persons could do the work of 6, with much less effort, and leisure time to spare. Were the people working harder before, or now? Simple common sense. And if the village were to be provided with running water, the women will not have to work as hard anymore.

And the remaining four men of the house can now open a store, move to the city to work, start a small business, do much more. They can incorporate more productivity in the economy.

And yet, they are not working as hard now, as they were before. Your juvenile logic does not fit in here anymore.

You say that India has not been able to change a system after 60 years? We have been changing the system since 1991, and continue to do so. Only an idiot will look at it as a one-point one-shot "change" that will magically change the nation.

Tell me, China is still a third world nation after 60+ years. You people need to "go deeper" and understand that you people don't work hard enough. The fault is with the common Chinese person, who is lazy, that is the only reason China has not made progress to the level of Japan and the West.

Huh - it sounds too dump even to be typing this shit.

 

[no smoking]

This is utter bollocks.

So, Chinese work less hard than Japanese, Americans, than Singaporeans, than Swiss, than Germans. That is the root cause of China's backwardness. QED.

Well, as the matter of fact, they did work harder than Chinese in certain period of a history.

This juvenile thinking that "people are not hard working enough, so the nation is not far enough ahead", is a teenage fantasy.

Of course, there is more reasons than just that. But not working hard enough is one of them.

Think of a farm in India, where a family of 6 people does backbreaking labour the whole day in the fields. Their womenfolk get up at 4 AM to walk 5 km to fetch water, and then cook food for the whole family. Are they "working hard" or not? Only an idiot will say that they are not working hard.

Now, if this family had mechanized tools for farming, two persons could do the work of 6, with much less effort, and leisure time to spare. Were the people working harder before, or now? Simple common sense. And if the village were to be provided with running water, the women will not have to work as hard anymore.

And the remaining four men of the house can now open a store, move to the city to work, start a small business, do much more. They can incorporate more productivity in the economy.

Your example has a little problem: how they get money to buy mechanized tools in the first place? What make them affordable for the new machines while other cannot? Assuming these people have no special skills to make their productivity better than others. The only way they can get this money is to work longer or eat less. Either way, they are actually working harder than others in certain period of time.

You say that India has not been able to change a system after 60 years? We have been changing the system since 1991, and continue to do so. Only an idiot will look at it as a one-point one-shot "change" that will magically change the nation.

Obviously, your 'change' is not good enough! First, you are late than a communism country to realise the need of change; Now, you have a problem of "stalled reform".

Tell me, China is still a third world nation after 60+ years. You people need to "go deeper" and understand that you people don't work hard enough. The fault is with the common Chinese person, who is lazy, that is the only reason China has not made progress to the level of Japan and the West.

Exactlly, that is the common sense for majority of chinese.
Unlike you in india blaming British, neighbours and even remote countries, we blame ourselves.

 

[s002wjh]

Tell me, China is still a third world nation after 60+ years. You people need to "go deeper" and understand that you people don't work hard enough. The fault is with the common Chinese person, who is lazy, that is the only reason China has not made progress to the level of Japan and the West.

Huh - it sounds too dump even to be typing this shit.

you don't expect china to catch up from dirt poor nation to the level of japan in a decade or two, even s.korea, japan take several decades to catch up western country such as german/US. but one only need to look at china development curve from from the 80's to now to realize where this is going, provide china is gonna be stable in the future.