US signs Afghanistan transit deal with Tajikistan: US official

Discussion in 'Subcontinent & Central Asia' started by Yusuf, Apr 21, 2009.

  1. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,273
    Likes Received:
    11,280
    Location:
    BANGalore
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...n-Afghan-transit-deal/articleshow/4430484.cms
     
  2.  
  3. F-14

    F-14 Global Defence Moderator Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563
    Likes Received:
    19
    ok now our dear Hamid Zaid would be Cronning away to Glory saying we are dooomed
     
  4. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,273
    Likes Received:
    11,280
    Location:
    BANGalore
    Why would he? If the Americans get an uninterrupted supply line, it will only help the Afghans.
    Right now it's non combat supplies, won't take too long for it to change to a full fledged supply route.
     
  5. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,536
    Likes Received:
    6,537
    Are they going from Turkey thru the ports to Tajikistan??? a long and expensive route.
     
  6. Daredevil

    Daredevil On Vacation! Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    11,613
    Likes Received:
    5,670
    No matter how many deals America makes with the surrounding countries of Afghanistan for the transit rights of NATO, the most cheapest apart from Pakistan will be Chabahar port in Iran. If some how americans manage to secure the deal for transit rights through Iran, it will be a win-win situation for India. In the coming days, there is a high possibility of news coming out on this deal if one has to go by the recent track-II talks between Iran and US in Geneva.
     
  7. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,536
    Likes Received:
    6,537
    totally agree DD
     
  8. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,273
    Likes Received:
    11,280
    Location:
    BANGalore
    Workin out the map, it would be Turkey,Armenia,Azerbaijan,Caspian,Turmenistan. Turkmenistan shares a border with Afghanistan,so why go to Takikistan? Or are they airlifting all the supplies?
     
  9. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,536
    Likes Received:
    6,537
    yusuf it maybe a combination of land,air and sea??
     
  10. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,273
    Likes Received:
    11,280
    Location:
    BANGalore
    It's going to be expensive using this route, but at least the supplies will reach the US forces.
    The sooner the US works out a deal with Iran, the better it is for it as it will be faster and cheaper.
     
  11. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,536
    Likes Received:
    6,537
    also this route is at the mercy of the russians if Obama does something Russia dosen't like they can end it like they did in kyrgistan in february.
     
  12. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,273
    Likes Received:
    11,280
    Location:
    BANGalore
    All boils down to the Iran question doesn't it?
     
  13. LETHALFORCE

    LETHALFORCE Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20,536
    Likes Received:
    6,537
    something USA is doing their best to avoid.
     
  14. EnlightenedMonk

    EnlightenedMonk Member of The Month JULY 2009 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,831
    Likes Received:
    23
    Why do I think that with the signing of this deal the number of attacks on convoys in Pakistan will suddenly drop ??? :113::113:

    If the US uses more of these convoys instead of Pakistan, their reliance on our neighbour will decrease and that possibly also means less aid to Pakistan with a demand for more accountability...
     
  15. fateh71

    fateh71 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2009
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    16
    I think the cost of the alternative route will be more than compensated by the pressure this feeling of beling left out will create on pakistan army. we know how badly they need help, but fake pride, their undoing in the past is still in the way.

    the PA has too many officers who love their taliban brothers, don't know to what extent the army will be able to control these terrorists in uniform.
     
  16. Pintu

    Pintu New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Messages:
    12,076
    Likes Received:
    327
    I agree with you Monk, actually when active supply route though Pakistan gets in to the full swing, the Pakistan's importance will also decrease as an ally of the USA , in the fighting in Afghanistan, and more importantly I think there will be cut in donations by the USA to Pakistan for "fighting the terror".

    Regards
     
  17. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Messages:
    24,273
    Likes Received:
    11,280
    Location:
    BANGalore
    Wonder why the US has not enforced a safe passage through Pakistan. Obviously Pakistan will say it violates her sovereignty, so be it to get the job done
     
  18. EnlightenedMonk

    EnlightenedMonk Member of The Month JULY 2009 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,831
    Likes Received:
    23
    Right said... they will claim Sovereignty violations over parts of territory which they have never ever really had any control over...
     

Share This Page