They said BBC is independent and it had nothing to do with Uk govt :/@Samar Rathi
A diplomatic protest, or letters from foreign office could have been sent.
Look, don't get me wrong here. I come to this forum to open up my vistas and know about things that I don't. Even when I argue I expect good, informative and intelligent counter-arguments in the form of back and forth banter. I try to reach a compromise or middle-ground and in general try to absorb differing opinions. My stances are very open and flexible. In general, I try to have a good time.My choice, I am not ignoring them. Now you drew a link with this episode with IT act 66A. Now let me see how you link it.
I am not interested in your blah-blah-blah.Look, don't get me wrong here. I come to this forum to open up my vistas and know about things that I don't. Even when I argue I expect good, informative and intelligent counter-arguments in the form of back and forth banter. I try to reach a compromise or middle-ground and in general try to absorb differing opinions. My stances are very open and flexible. In general, I try to have a good time.
Some people, again like to argue and enjoy the thrill of winning arguments. That may be exciting in a different way. But it's not my thing.
I don't think I will enjoy the argument. Hence I think its best for me not to have it.
LoL! yeah pointing out supreme court is not a mob justice is a triviality to you. Yes everyone PMed you about our last argument, didn't they? Stop conjuring up 'anyone' to make a case for you. Why don't you simply say, you can't prove what you have wrote, we shall part until you commit a mistake again. Easy.@ladder
You make straw-man arguments, focus on trivialities and resort to insults. Anyone in the forum can see how our last argument went. Any argument with you will waste both our times. It is ok if we agree to disagree on certain things.
Wrong again, netizens felt a sense of hurt and insult after this case hit limelight. Indian laws were violated and instead of being a Freedom of Speech parrot, let the court decide whether the ban was correct or not.If awareness was the goal, a video like this counter-video was welcome. Written protest, discussions - everything is welcome. But ban is not. Do you support the ban on "Kissa Kursi Ka" as well, which showed Sanjay Gandhi in bad light?
People should have the right to satirize and criticize the government, religion and any established order. Banning, censoring only creates distorted images of our society.
In this case, netizens got aware of sexual violence in western countries, not because of the ban, but because the ban failed and some individuals took upon themselves the task of providing counter information and counter-videos, which is what should have been done in the first place.
And the Indian court has said there is absolutely no hurry in lifting the ban.Wrong again, netizens felt a sense of hurt and insult after this case hit limelight. Indian laws were violated and instead of being a Freedom of Speech parrot, let the court decide whether the ban was correct or not.