Speedy Trains Transform China

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
709
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/b...ina.html?_r=0&pagewanted=all&pagewanted=print

CHANGSHA, China — The cavernous rail station here for China's new high-speed trains was nearly deserted when it opened less than four years ago.

Not anymore. Practically every train is sold out, although they leave for cities all over the country every several minutes. Long lines snake back from ticket windows under the 50-foot ceiling of white, gently undulating steel that floats cloudlike over the departure hall. An ambitious construction program will soon nearly double the size of the 16-platform station.

Just five years after China's high-speed rail system opened, it is carrying nearly twice as many passengers each month as the country's domestic airline industry. With traffic growing 28 percent a year for the last several years, China's high-speed rail network will handle more passengers by early next year than the 54 million people a month who board domestic flights in the United States.

Li Xiaohung, a shoe factory worker, rides the 430-mile route from Guangzhou home to Changsha once a month to visit her daughter. Ms. Li used to see her daughter just once a year because the trip took a full day. Now she comes back in 2 hours 19 minutes.

Business executives like Zhen Qinan, a founder of the stock market in coastal Shenzhen, ride bullet trains to meetings all over China to avoid airport delays. The trains hurtle along at 186 miles an hour and are smooth, well-lighted, comfortable and almost invariably punctual, if not early. "I did not think it would change so quickly. High-speed trains seemed like a strange thing, but now it's just part of our lives," Mr. Zhen said.

China's high-speed rail system has emerged as an unexpected success story. Economists and transportation experts cite it as one reason for China's continued economic growth when other emerging economies are faltering. But it has not been without costs — high debt, many people relocated and a deadly accident. The corruption trials this summer of two former senior rail ministry officials have cast an unfavorable light on the bidding process for the rail lines.

The high-speed rail lines have, without a doubt, transformed China, often in unexpected ways.

For example, Chinese workers are now more productive. A paper for the World Bank by three consultants this year found that Chinese cities connected to the high-speed rail network, as more than 100 are already, are likely to experience broad growth in worker productivity. The productivity gains occur when companies find themselves within a couple of hours' train ride of tens of millions of potential customers, employees and rivals.

"What we see very clearly is a change in the way a lot of companies are doing business," said Gerald Ollivier, a World Bank senior transport specialist in Beijing.

Productivity gains to the economy appear to be of the same order as the combined economic gains from the usual arguments given for high-speed trains, including time savings for travelers, reduced noise, less air pollution and fuel savings, the World Bank consultants calculated.

Companies are opening research and development centers in more glamorous cities like Beijing and Shenzhen with abundant supplies of young, highly educated workers, and having them take frequent day trips to factories in cities with lower wages and land costs, like Tianjin and Changsha. Businesses are also customizing their products more through frequent meetings with clients in other cities, part of a broader move up the ladder toward higher value-added products.

Li Qingfu, the sales manager at the Changsha Don Lea Ramie Textile Technology Company, an exporter of women's dresses and blouses, said he used to travel twice a year to Guangzhou, the commercial hub of southeastern China. The journey, similar in distance to traveling from Boston to Washington, required nearly a full day in each direction of winding up and down mountains by train or by car.

He now goes almost every month on the punctual bullet trains, which slice straight through the forested mountains and narrow valleys of southern Hunan province and northern Guangdong province in a little over two hours, traversing long tunnels and elevated concrete viaducts in rapid succession.

"More frequent access to my client base has allowed me to more quickly pick up on fashion changes in color and style. My orders have increased by 50 percent," he said.

China relocated large numbers of families whose homes lay in the path of the tracks and quickly built new residential and commercial districts around high-speed train stations.

The new districts, typically located in inner suburbs, not downtown areas, have rapidly attracted large numbers of residents, partly because of China's rapid urbanization. Enough farm families become city dwellers each year to fill New York City, part of a trend visible during a series of visits to the Changsha high-speed train station over the last four years.

When the station opened at the end of 2009 in an inner suburb full of faded state-owned factories, the neighborhood was initially silent. But by 2011, nearly 200 tower cranes could be counted building high-rises during the half-hour drive from downtown Changsha to the high-speed rail station. On a morning last month, only several dozen tower cranes were visible along nearly the same route. But a vibrant new area of apartment towers, commercial office buildings and hotels had opened near the train station.

China's success may not be easily reproduced in the West, and not just because few places can match China's pace of urbanization. China has four times the population of the United States, and the great bulk of its people live in the eastern third of the country, an area similar in size to the United States east of the Mississippi.

"Except for Boston to Washington, D.C., we don't have the corridors" of high population density that China has, said C. William Ibbs, a professor of civil engineering at the University of California, Berkeley.

China's high-speed rail program has been married to the world's most ambitious subway construction program, as more than half the world's large tunneling machines chisel away underneath big Chinese cities. That has meant easy access to high-speed rail stations for huge numbers of people — although the subway line to Changsha's high-speed train station has been delayed after a deadly tunnel accident, a possible side effect of China's haste.

New subway lines, rail lines and urban districts are part of China's heavy dependence on investment-led growth. Despite repeated calls by Chinese leaders for a shift to more consumer-led growth, it shows little sign of changing. China's new prime minister, Li Keqiang, publicly endorsed further expansion of the 5,900-mile high-speed rail network this summer. He said the country would invest $100 billion a year in its train system for years to come, mainly on high-speed rail.

The Chinese government is already struggling with nearly $500 billion in overall rail debt. Most of it was incurred for the high-speed rail system and financed with bank loans that must be rolled over as often as once a year. Using short-term loans made the financing look less risky on the balance sheets of the state-controlled banking system and held down borrowing costs. But the reliance on short-term credit has left the system vulnerable to any increase in interest rates.

"Even well-performing railways capable of covering their cash running costs and interest on their debt will almost certainly be unable to repay the principal without some long-term financing arrangements," said a World Bank report last year.

Another impact: air travel. Train ridership has soared partly because China has set fares on high-speed rail lines at a little less than half of comparable airfares and then refrained from raising them. On routes that are four or five years old, prices have stayed the same as blue-collar wages have more than doubled. That has resulted in many workers, as well as business executives, switching to high-speed trains.

Airlines have largely halted service on routes of less than 300 miles when high-speed rail links open. They have reduced service on routes of 300 to 470 miles.

The double-digit annual wage increases give the Chinese enough disposable income that domestic airline traffic has still been growing 10 percent a year. That is the second-fastest growth among the world's 10 largest domestic aviation markets, after India, which now faces a slowdown as the fall of the rupee has made aviation fuel exorbitantly expensive for air carriers there.

High-speed trains are not only allowing business managers from deep inside China to reach bigger markets. They are also prompting foreign executives to look deeper in China for suppliers as wages surge along the coast.

"We always used to have go down south to Guangzhou to meet with European clients, but now they come up to Changsha more often," said Hwang Yin, a sales executive at the Changsha Qilu Import and Export Company.

The only drawback: "The high-speed trains are getting very crowded these days."
Average city-to-city travel times (as a product of metro distance) in China are now approaching Western European and US averages.

The other thing to note is that the total level of investment into high-speed rail is over half a trillion USD (once you include non-debt financing and debt that has been paid off). Could the Indian government or economy ever execute any investment project on that scale?
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
The other thing to note is that the total level of investment into high-speed rail is over half a trillion USD (once you include non-debt financing and debt that has been paid off). Could the Indian government or economy ever execute any investment project on that scale?
I think trains in India would be less sterile and more interesting.

Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
Proverbs 16:18
 

nimo_cn

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
4,032
Likes
883
Country flag
Last year we were talking about vacant coaches.

Sent from my HUAWEI T8951 using Tapatalk 2
 

mattster

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
1,171
Likes
870
Country flag
No other country in the world has as many migrant workers who move from the countryside to the cities and suburbs as China.

The 2nd point is that these migrant workers who are Chinese citizens are like 3rd class pariahs in their own country.
They cannot live in the city. Their children cannot attend local schools. They have no rights like other city residents.
Basically they are like dogs used for their cheap labor to support China's export machine.

So it's natural that these guy have to travel long distances to go back home to the countryside when they need to go home.

This is why China needs high-speed rail more than any other country. They are not enough planes and airports to support the slave labor that keeps the factories humming.
 

nimo_cn

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
4,032
Likes
883
Country flag
No other country in the world has as many migrant workers who move from the countryside to the cities and suburbs as China.

The 2nd point is that these migrant workers who are Chinese citizens are like 3rd class pariahs in their own country.
They cannot live in the city. Their children cannot attend local schools. They have no rights like other city residents.
Basically they are like dogs used for their cheap labor to support China's export machine.

So it's natural that these guy have to travel long distances to go back home to the countryside when they need to go home.

This is why China needs high-speed rail more than any other country. They are not enough planes and airports to support the slave labor that keeps the factories humming.
Most migrant workers go back home once each year to celebrate Chinese spring festival.

How do explain the rest of the year?

Sent from my HUAWEI T8951 using Tapatalk 2
 

Tolaha

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2009
Messages
2,158
Likes
1,416
Could it be the case of CCP's flagship project being encouraged for usage by reducing/not increasing the number of planes and regular trains? "If" that is the case, then it would be another daylight robbery.
 

Dinesh_Kumar

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
518
Likes
231
Trains can transform India too, and need not be high speed...............just punctual. Fuel, salaries and overhead costs remains the same whether the train is late or not. Railways and Ministry only look at this, and are not bothered about other aspects. Making accurate rail timetables (note the word "accurate") and reducing uncertainty is being done by many countries now, most of whom dont have the world's largest pool of engineers, cannot build supercomputers and dont have robust space launch capability, so why cant we? Passenger load factors, reliability and use of rail to move cargo across India (lowers prices of goods for consumers, nation benefits) have not been perused vigorously even though it wont cost anything extra to do so..
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
I think the priority is that India requires high speed good corridor so that material can be transported faster to destinations and the rakes released quickly for rotation.

However, being a democracy, we will have the usual problems of land acquisition!
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/24/b...ina.html?_r=0&pagewanted=all&pagewanted=print



Average city-to-city travel times (as a product of metro distance) in China are now approaching Western European and US averages.

The other thing to note is that the total level of investment into high-speed rail is over half a trillion USD (once you include non-debt financing and debt that has been paid off). Could the Indian government or economy ever execute any investment project on that scale?
Investment can always be scuppered up.

Like it is being done for the MNERGA and Food Security, both unique in terms of the world.

However, the point is that the priorities dictate investment and not the urge to do something spectacular for cosmetic kudos!
 

Barak2

Regular Member
Joined
May 11, 2015
Messages
91
Likes
15
Because i am a traveler and keeps my interest in these things. These trains are surely going to leave an impact because of the way things are going ahead and of course it is a need of the era as well. To me important is to experience the best and also that becomes certainly good at the moment for me it needed to know how goodly countries are going ahead in this side which is an appreciable thought.
 

Khagesh

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
1,274
Likes
870
I think the priority is that India requires high speed good corridor so that material can be transported faster to destinations and the rakes released quickly for rotation.

However, being a democracy, we will have the usual problems of land acquisition!
Also:
1) More lines along the existing ones
2) better goods handling and yards
3) dedicated trains for industry should be promoted

As I see it the only reason Bullet Trains are being pursued is because in some sectors the users can pay for it and it serves to bring about a change in low spirits.

Unfortunately the first year the fell short of new tracks target by around 25%. They have not reduced the target for the next year. But I am afraid this is not enough.

There are some odd factories near Gwalior. They do not use one full station and one smaller station to ferry goods even though Inland Container Depot is nearby. ICD hardly gets used. Very very laid back. Trucking instead gets used far too much. This should be forced to change.
 

Compersion

Senior Member
Joined
May 6, 2013
Messages
2,258
Likes
923
Country flag
I think the priority is that India requires high speed good corridor so that material can be transported faster to destinations and the rakes released quickly for rotation.

However, being a democracy, we will have the usual problems of land acquisition!
I agree that the high speed rail is good and necessary and frankly use of airtravel can be reduced and removed for distances where it makes economic sense and one needs choice and eventually cost of high speed travel will come down.

but your comment made me think who are the average user of high speed rails in PRC - is there a separate network of slow speed rail in PRC. made me wonder after reading a interview.

Q. in PRC is there parallel train networks. Does high speed network use the same tracks like normal slow rail. and what about Maglev track in Shanghai.

that means there is huge networks in PRC. one can say three expensive (slow, high speed, maglev) networks in PRC. that means there is choice. is the slower rail network in PRC is it in a state of actualisation. is it PRC only build high speed + railway now. what are the costs here. it must be massive.

is the slower rail network being improved if not being made redundant because if given a choice high speed and ease of travel is better.

i mean why PRC needs slow train.

what is the comments of people using slow speed rail (still) in PRC. when people sit in slow train is it because there is no high speed train for their destination. is it because no choice. because if given choice between high speed and normal speed to go somewhere everyone would take former. is it about economics. how does it feel for people to still sit in slow train in PRC. why they need to do that.

mention of large migration during holidays do these people use high speed over slow rail train. is high speed during such period fully sold out. that means such people can travel quickly and for longer period stay. what is the average time used by such people. do PRC government reduce fairs of high speed network during such periods to make people happy. will the people demand such choice. what about when no holiday and other times. is it about economics.

someone mentioned that Beijing had metro for many years yet people used to use cycle for same distance. now there is metro and now the person said it is making people not use cars. is it about economics. in PRC reasoning is sometime customary.

will the high speed rail access be for mass population use. will everyone use only high speed rail. not sure if it will be working that way. are PRC too early and too fast in building such large high speed network especially between major areas and its population are not a democracy. is high speed suited in PRC for mass use.

people will say PRC plan long term and think about next generation. but how long it took for PRC to build the high speed railway (not really that long). is it contingency for ruling.

High speed rail can also be suited in PRC dynamics to "lift spirits" like PRC connect high speed rail to North Korea. It makes economic sense. It would be better to go to South Korea but it would hurt to see no stops in North Korea.

the better analysis is:

1. Military use. This is the most reasonable analysis i can think for justifying how PRC implemented high speed rail. end use of high speed rail is for military and population control which i believe is more suited and reasonable analysis. I have to give credit and PRC plan and execute it well. No doubt.

the development of PRC high speed rail is impressive. the infrastructure is impressive and done well. it is not like the japanese and quality is question and also IPR issue but still it is achievement.

Likewise I will defend and make sure Air India is always there and never touched. It is needed for the country and is a achievement and even can be used for military use. Can i replace the words High Speed Rail with Air India ... I suppose yes

One thing is that PRC has shown that it can be done without democracy. It is kind of PRC to share its learning with us.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/na...hi-chandigarh-semi-high-speed-rail/65938.html

** (added later) Semi-High Speed Trains

"France will partner India in a study for upgrading the speed on Delhi-Chandigarh rail line to 200 km per hour and help in re-development of Ambala and Ludhiana railway stations."


http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...orch-Vij-tracks-soon/articleshow/47142875.cms

"While the New Delhi-Agra section is almost ready to run the semi-high speed trains"

Speed for the mass for the people and not expensive !! That would transform many things and be good for democracy.
 
Last edited:

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top