RESPONSE TO INDIAN DEFENSE NEWS' BABBLING VIS-A-VIS ABABEEL

[praneet.bajpaie]

Usual stupid murmurings from paki analyst having below than average iq, pakis so far could not have anaged to make a working railway engine but claim that they have built nuclear missiles and atomic weapons on their own lols just admit it pakis your scientific community isnt talented enough and the so called father of paki atomic programme himself is a thief, he stole tech from the dutch

Railway Engine? Ask them to make a moped or a bicycle first. lol

 

[PD_Solo]

FROM SECRET LOAN PAKISTAN WILL FACE INDIA

When you don't understand something but still Nod your Head- Aniqa nisar.

 

[Kshatriya87]

When you don't understand something but still Nod your Head- Aniqa nisar.

SAHI,...........................SAHI....................................SAHI..............................That's all she says.

 

[AbRaj]

LAUGHTER THERAPY SERVES NO CURE: INDIA’S DELUSIONAL RESPONSE TO PAKISTAN’S TECTONIC LEAP IN MISSILE TECHNOLOGY


Formulated in the early 17th century and most fondly played up until now, Bluff is a game of acute deception. Proclaiming an upper hand, boasting thy credentials and starring through the adversary’s soul are tactics and skills which a Bluffer employees to psychologically obliterate his foe and provoke him into making the bellicose move. The adversary or “Gazer” as he may be referred to, minutely observes gestures, expressions and gesticulations manifested by the Bluffers, in a shrewd attempt to understand and asses his capacity and ability to maneuver. The game lingers on and the statuesque remains intact, up-until the point when one player decides to close with and confront the other on his “Claim.” This move “Show” as they call it, decisively turns the table on either the “Bluffer” or the “Gazer” and it is this detrimental and conclusively resultant nature which both signifies this move and adds to its credentials. Players throughout the past centuries have always kept this move in high esteem, only and solely to be employed when all ifs and buts stand answered and no doubt lingers whatsoever with respect to the ingenuity of the adversary’s claim.

In Bluff It Is Not Merely The Strength Of The Foe Which Demands Respect It Is Also The Very Notion Of It Which Does.

Bluff in the contemporary linguistics is no more a nomenclature associated with a set of boring cards, Bluff is a craft, rather art which is employed and applied in almost every major walk of modern life. Be it corporate manipulations, be it astute diplomacy or be it the vicious blazes of war, the idol of bluff stands tall at every other square of cosmos. It is this phenomenon which has not only made critical decision making much more onerous at the highest levels of administrative state-craft but has also intensified the realms of restraint. In the obsolete days of card-playing a wrong call of “Show” could at most cost a player the game and the gamble involved with it but given the viscosity of affairs in the Post-Manhattan world a Wrong Call can come too high a cost for any perpetual player be it an industry, a corporation or a major nation state. Late President Saddam’s ludicrous calling of the American Bluff in Qatar War led to Operation Desert Storm. Saddam Hussain, The Ba’ath Party and the Iraqi Armed Forces suffered colossal and irrevocable damages owing to the fact that America Wasn’t Bluffing. This incident alone speaks volumes about the inevitability of precaution when it comes to assessing the adversary’s “Claim.”

The phenomenon of bluff has been at play at the politico-diplomatic horizon of South-Asia right from the beginning of the post-partition era. Any keen student of this “Interesting Region (Chinese Phrase)” knows how both the principal arch-rivals of this area have been waging a mammoth psychological war for over the last 70 odd years. India & Pakistan have both played Bluff with eye balls locked and their hands lying on perilous draggers as the world watched in horror. History stands testimonial to the fact that in this battle of the nerves India has many-a-times run short of the requisite temperament and blinked first when it amounted to “A Call.” All of us know, by means of publically available / declassified data that in 1999 when India dared to venture into the zone of Nuclear Testing it had acute contempt for the notion that Pakistan has the capacity to reciprocate its provocation by an equivalent & befitting response. Ajai K. Rai in “India’s Nuclear Diplomacy After Pokhran II” reveals that there existed a certain unanimity, with the exception of one or two, in India’s defence & political establishment that Pakistan does not possess the capacity to test a nuclear device and that it’s muscle-flexing and gestures are a mere Bluff. Sadly for India and for the peace-nicks across the globe this perception was erroneously void of any merit. Pakistan within days of Pokhran-II undertook Chaghi-I and the new factor of nuclear-parity was introduced in the strategic climate of South-Asia. India despite having a proportionally large and well supplied military lost its conventional edge due to its own lunacy. Just as in Desert Strom Saddam came to realize America’s strength post-call, in Chaghi India came to comprehend with all her amazement what its ages old rival had actually achieved. The statements of Indian policy-makers pre and post Chaghi are a reflection of the shock–wave which ran across the hearts and minds of a wishful nation. For many days India expressed doubts regarding the authenticity of Pakistani claims but gradually the mourning did set in where it was due.

As Sputnik recently put it Pakistan and India are currently competing for a race of ballistic supremacy in South-Asia. Both the nation states are on a spree of missiles testing that continues unabated and has no foreseeable end. It seems like India’s resolve to pose herself as a hegemon and Pakistan’s decision to confront her, by cutting her (India) to her size, has triggered the latest saga off. While the world watches with concern and players of international significance express their displeasure and call for restraint, India prima-facie has decided to walk along a destructive path, the path of delusion. While celebrating with uttermost joy its own half-baked missiles, many of which routinely fail to achieve the desired objectives India’s propaganda machine has decided to flout claims made by Pakistan and thus knit a self-wrapping web of delusion which makes it adapt the ostrich strategy of denial.

Pakistan successfully tested the sea based variant of its cruise missile namely Babur-3 on the 09th day of January 2017. The test which was undertaken by a submarine based launcher in the Arabian Sea successfully produced the desired results as per the prism of design and development. The successful testing of Babur-3 had a monumental significance especially with regard to the fact that it introduced in South-Asian Nuclear-Realpolitik the factor of credible second strike. Pakistan had long been hearkening for this ability and its efforts to achieve it were neither hidden from international observers, who extensively wrote about it, nor from the monitoring agencies who formally expressed the fear of escalation. Given this background India’s reaction to such a test should have been composed, articulate, subtle and befitting but instead what came about was a hilarious comedy of errors. A certain self-proclaimed satellite imagery expert on twitter with the handle @rajfortyseven claimed that by mere power of naked-eye, he has managed to visually decrypt the fact that Pakistan has conducted a pseudo-test of the said cruise missile. The revelation was neither supplemented by any numerical data nor was it scientifically argued, to add to the flavor of this exposé absolutely no personal or academic credentials of this so-called Expert were either available on twitter or anywhere else. The account which has a bleak following of over 3 Thousand even does not have a full-name or a picture to associate with. The mega-investigator @rajfortyseven is thus a Twitter account with no more merits that that of @TomAndJerry007 or @hulk, accounts such as these are normally administered by high school punks or designated propaganda cells, the babbling that occurs at them neither deserves an ear nor a spared moment. However in disregard of any press ethics and without the fear of damaging their own journalistic credibility, all Indian newspapers deemed it fit to propagate the “Startling Exposure” that had taken place. @rajfortyseven featured on the front page of mainstream Indian Press and still without any credentials. By stories titled “Twitter Laughs Off Pakistani Claims” Indian media made itself a laughing stock for the entire world.

The opera of glaring ignorance didn’t stop right there, on the 24th day of January 2017 Pakistan tested the much awaited “Ababeel Missile”. Awaited as we call it because ever since India tested the “ASHWIN” Advanced Air & Ballistic Missile Defence Mechanism, several notable and reputed observers expressed their apprehension that Pakistan will sooner rather than later restore the strategic balance by fielding a Multiple War-Head Missile. A Voice of America Report dated May the 19th 2016 and Titled “False Sense of Security” had cautioned India that given geographical parameters and restraints of South-Asia no missile defence system in India can credibly lay-off the Pakistani ballistic-threat, the report went on to say that India’s experimentation in this regard and her blatantly un-veiled ambitions will provoke Pakistan into improvising with the existent arsenal of nuclear weapons delivery systems. So in lieu with what was apparent, Pakistan tested its nascent version of “Ababeel” which employed Multi Independent Re-entry Vehicle (MIRV) technology, thereby Pakistan demonstrated its capacity to defeat the very Fundamental Doctrine of Indian Missile Defence and ensured the survivability of its indigenous missiles program thus restoring the faulting realms of strategic balance via Nuclear Deterrence. Indian defence and military establishment rather than comprehending the newly emerged reality and strategically complying thereof by devising new policies, decided to run another smear campaign, the head and tail of which seem to be interlocked. An arbitrary piece origins of which are unknown and whose author is anonymous, appeared on a website (Indian Defence News) closely related to the Indian military. The piece titled “IDN TAKE: PAKISTAN SAYS IT TESTED MIRV TECHNOLOGY, INDIA LAUGHS” is a cluster of hilarious and absurd jokes.

The anonymous author who seems to be void of both technical and academic knowledge has tried to draw analogy out of thin air. Given herein under is an account of the major objections the anonymous author has leveled in his piece and the absurdity that resides therein:


1. The author by having a bird’s eye view of the Missile’s imagery has concluded that, Pakistan has in-fact fielded Shaheen-II ballistic missile and reclaimed it as Ababeel, the author further supplements the claim by critically examining the range of Ababeel and finding it to be in close proximity of Shaheen-II.

■ The author fails to recollect that similar Indian publications also raised doubts on the accuracy and viability of Shaheen-II when it was first tested in 2004, now to call Ababeel a duplication of Shaheen-II is not only hilarious but preposterous to say the least. The author further does not offer any explanation as to the reason why Pakistan could not have doctored the perpetual range of the subject missile in its claim, if the test indeed would have been non-existent.


2. The author expresses fascination over how China could transfer such a crucial and paramount technology to Pakistan despite her longstanding relationship with her.

■ The author is infected with the thought that Pakistan is unable to develop missile technology on its own; this figment of thought stands in sharp contrast to the established facts which ascertain that Pakistan’s nuclear and missile technology is indigenous and self-reliable. The author further ignores the fact that recently declassified CIA documents establish the attribute that China and Pakistan have an extremely deep-rooted strategic relationship which transgresses the boundaries of conventional cooperation.



3. The author argues that MIRV would require much smaller nuclear warheads which can be mounted for multiple-dispersion.


■ Pakistan’s development of small low-yield nuclear weapons is a fact which is both established and well acknowledged across the globe, the author’s poor knowledge in this regard is a reflection of his limited or nonexistent exposure.



4. The author hilariously argues that the range of an MIRV should be longer than what Ababeel has claimed.


■ The objection is obtuse and reflective of an ignorant mind which does not know or understand strategic aspects. Pakistan’s Missiles set their range in accordance with the very clearly defined Prospective Target that is India. Pakistan’s increase in the range of its missile would only be detrimental to its own interests as it would invoke fear in the minds of its apparent allies. Ababeel’s Range in well within Pakistan’s defined doctrine of defence and is rationally coherent. Furthermore the mechanics of MIRV have no proportional relationship with the dynamics of range; Jericho-3 (Israel’s MIRV) is a glittering example.


5. The author expresses amazement to the fact that Pakistan unlike never reports the failure of any of its missiles. The author thus inferences that Pakistan’s test might have failed but an adverse claim has been lodged.


■ The objection more or less seems to remorse on India’s domestic missile industry which is infected by the parasite of corruption and is thus rendered significantly disabled. Pakistan has complete tele-metric data of its successful missile tests and the same are monitored by the observatory mechanics of CENTCOM. The quality of Pakistan’s missiles is well-acknowledged and regarded across the globe and the same cannot be daunted by the failure of its neighbor.


In view of the foregoing one is drawn to the conclusion that the article titled “IDN TAKE: PAKISTAN SAYS IT TESTED MIRV TECHNOLOGY, INDIA LAUGHS” is nothing but a sadist piece of lit-erotica. The anonymous author who seems to be part and partial of the Indian propaganda machinery has merely tried in vain to brush-off the baggage of continuous failure that have piled up the back of the Indian military. The exercise seems to be a quintessential assignment which aims to create a delusional spell around the Indian populous and the privileged elite. It seems that a Narcotic-Analgesic is being self-injection into the nervous system of the Indian Security Prism whereby it would be easier for the establishment to adapt an ostrich policy and remain indifferent to the developing equation.

Without prejudice to the equity of diplomacy, one must advice India to walk on the path of realism rather than delusion. Pakistan’s strategic capacity to obliterate India remains intact and internationally visible. It shall remain unaffected from the Indian propaganda and will not falter by the appreciation of India or vice-versa. India must not consider Pakistan’s upper hand a bluff and should neither call her a Show. Any such bellicose move might drive the gamble out of her hand and into the Pakistan ambit.

In A Quintessential Fashion Right When India’s Aiming To Blink, Pakistan Is Not

Bluffing.

Why not post picture of this Madarassa educated Thick Head of Islamabad.

PS: @Zarvan close your eyes mulla . coz I'm going to post unislamic/haram photo of this "half life"

 

[AbRaj]

ISPR is successsfully fooling pakis to continue looting them. Anyways, good for us.

They are inbreeds. Born retards.

 

[Project Dharma]

Formulated in the early 17th century and most fondly played up until now, Bluff is a game of acute deception. Proclaiming an upper hand, boasting thy credentials and starring through the adversary’s soul are tactics and skills which a Bluffer employees to psychologically obliterate his foe and provoke him into making the bellicose move. The adversary or “Gazer” as he may be referred to, minutely observes gestures, expressions and gesticulations manifested by the Bluffers, in a shrewd attempt to understand and asses his capacity and ability to maneuver. The game lingers on and the statuesque remains intact, up-until the point when one player decides to close with and confront the other on his “Claim.” This move “Show” as they call it, decisively turns the table on either the “Bluffer” or the “Gazer” and it is this detrimental and conclusively resultant nature which both signifies this move and adds to its credentials. Players throughout the past centuries have always kept this move in high esteem, only and solely to be employed when all ifs and buts stand answered and no doubt lingers whatsoever with respect to the ingenuity of the adversary’s claim.

In Bluff It Is Not Merely The Strength Of The Foe Which Demands Respect It Is Also The Very Notion Of It Which Does.

Bluff in the contemporary linguistics is no more a nomenclature associated with a set of boring cards, Bluff is a craft, rather art which is employed and applied in almost every major walk of modern life. Be it corporate manipulations, be it astute diplomacy or be it the vicious blazes of war, the idol of bluff stands tall at every other square of cosmos. It is this phenomenon which has not only made critical decision making much more onerous at the highest levels of administrative state-craft but has also intensified the realms of restraint. In the obsolete days of card-playing a wrong call of “Show” could at most cost a player the game and the gamble involved with it but given the viscosity of affairs in the Post-Manhattan world a Wrong Call can come too high a cost for any perpetual player be it an industry, a corporation or a major nation state. Late President Saddam’s ludicrous calling of the American Bluff in Qatar War led to Operation Desert Storm. Saddam Hussain, The Ba’ath Party and the Iraqi Armed Forces suffered colossal and irrevocable damages owing to the fact that America Wasn’t Bluffing. This incident alone speaks volumes about the inevitability of precaution when it comes to assessing the adversary’s “Claim.”

Very poor grammar, it's hard to comprehend this gibberish. Please try again when you are on your meds and not tripping on camel urine/Quran crap.

Chaghi India came to comprehend with all her amazement what its ages old rival had actually achieved.

The only thing India was amazed at was that China would dare to proliferate to Pakistan just to spite India.

similar Indian publications

Same Indian publications? Same author? Nope.. This argument is retarded.

The author is infected with the thought that Pakistan is unable to develop missile technology on its own; this figment of thought stands in sharp contrast to the established facts which ascertain that Pakistan’s nuclear and missile technology is indigenous and self-reliable. The author further ignores the fact that recently declassified CIA documents establish the attribute that China and Pakistan have an extremely deep-rooted strategic relationship which transgresses the boundaries of conventional cooperation.

There - the retard just answered himself by contradicting.


Do you monkeys at PDF just start a circle jerk when somebody manages to fart a wall of text or do you even read the contents?

 

[Zarvan]

Ya right. Pakistan took a "tectonic leap" in 1 day ? awesome. Its not a button you press and get a MIRV. You need decades of research and dozens of tests to claim that you have MIRV.

Sirf paki hi aise jhand hai jo ek test me yeh claim karte hai.. and MIRV in 2200 km range? A million facepalms are not enough.

@Sakal Gharelu Ustad @sayareakd @LETHALFORCE Yeh pagal phir aa gya, pls close this thread. Its utterly senseless.

Dude our Missile program started around 1991 it is now pretty much 26 to 27 year old. It was slow in first few years specially under Benzair Government and even Musharraf stopped few projects but we are working on developing Missiles for years now. MIRV didn't came out of no where we were developing it for quite some time. As Zubair Hayat who is CJOC formerly headed our SPD and now as CJOC he is also fully in charge of nuclear program we are revealing our Missiles which were not being revealed as we were more close to USA formerly but as we are changing sides so now we are coming up and showing our new weapons. Don't worry soon new Cruise Missiles and other Missiles will also be tested. Ababeel is just the beginning.

 

[Zarvan]

Hi Zarvan. Nice to see you post a crap of PDF troll after his permission. Article is too crap to go through and response. If that can make you happy, you can post here. When you guys post and believe in this sort of crap and gets excited, it reflects your national character. If somebody read the post of you guys (Including Chinese), They will not take more than few minutes to come to a conclusion why a country is a dictatorial regime and why the another is a failed state. Enjoy.

Article is not shit you have no answer because you are full of delusions

 

[vinuzap]

Dude our Missile program started around 1991 it is now pretty much 26 to 27 year old. It was slow in first few years specially under Benzair Government and even Musharraf stopped few projects but we are working on developing Missiles for years now. MIRV didn't came out of no where we were developing it for quite some time. As Zubair Hayat who is CJOC formerly headed our SPD and now as CJOC he is also fully in charge of nuclear program we are revealing our Missiles which were not being revealed as we were more close to USA formerly but as we are changing sides so now we are coming up and showing our new weapons. Don't worry soon new Cruise Missiles and other Missiles will also be tested. Ababeel is just the beginning.

you mean to say satelite images which other have are fake for ababeel and how it was fakely tested- again a mulla logic'

yes the AQ Khan started doing nuclear chori and this :

1989: According to Pakistani sources, Hatf-1 and Hatf-2 ballistic missiles are fired to ranges of 80 and 300 kilometers respectively. Pakistan and China also sign a ten-year cooperation agreement in defense science, technology and industry, including joint procurement, research and development, production and technology transfer.

1990: President Bush can no longer certify Pakistan has no nuclear weapons. The United States suspends military aid to Pakistan.

July 1990: Pakistan's first satellite, the 50 kg Badr-A (Badr-1), is launched as part of a test flight of China's Long March 2E booster, according to Aviation Week and Space Technology.

1991: The United States sanctions two Chinese entities and Pakistan's SUPARCO for missile proliferation activities.

April 1991: The Washington Post reports that U.S. intelligence agencies have spotted what appears to be a number of launch vehicles for Chinese M-11 ballistic missiles in Pakistan.

December 1991: A Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman announces that China's Ministry of Aerospace Industry and Pakistan's SUPARCO have signed an agreement on cooperation in the peaceful application of space sciences and technology.

January 1992: The New York Times cites senior Bush administration officials as stating that China has delivered guidance systems for M-11 ballistic missiles to Pakistan.

June 1992: The U.S. Department of Commerce amends the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to clarify which destinations will require a validated license "when an exporter knows that the items will be used in the design, development, production or use of missiles." Pakistan's Hatf series is among the missile programs targeted.

1993: The United States sanctions Pakistan's Ministry of Defense and ten Chinese entities for missile proliferation activities.

1994: Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto says the testing and deployment of India's Prithvi surface-to-surface missile "threatens to trigger a missile race in the subcontinent."

1995: U.S. intelligence says it has strong evidence that Pakistan is building storage sheds, mobile launchers and maintenance facilities at the Sargodha military airbase for Chinese-supplied M-11 missiles.



March 1996: Taiwan confiscates 15 tons of ammonium perchlorate, used in the production of missile propellant, from a North Korean freighter bound for SUPARCO.

June 1996: Intelligence reports claim that Pakistan has uncrated and deployed the M-11 missiles.

July-December 1996: The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) states that Pakistan is making "strong efforts to acquire an indigenous capability in missile production technologies," and that China "was a major supplier to Pakistan's ballistic missile program, providing technology and assistance."

October 1996: The Washington Post reports that, according to a classified U.S. National Intelligence Estimate, Pakistan may have developed nuclear warheads to mount on its M-11 missiles. U.S. intelligence officials also state that China is assisting Pakistan to build a missile factory in a Rawalpindi suburb, anticipated in a year or two to be able to produce most of the major components of a Chinese M-11 missile.

December 1996: Hong Kong custom officers raid a Chinese vessel and find 10 metric tons of ammonium perchlorate. The cargo is believed to have been shipped by the North Korean company Lyongaksan and bound for SUPARCO.

1997: The CIA states that Chinese and North Korean entities continue to provide assistance to Pakistan's ballistic missile program, which is "critical for Islamabad's efforts to achieve independence from foreign sources and to produce long-range ballistic missiles."

April 1998: Pakistan tests the new Ghauri (Hatf-V) missile. The Ghauri is a nuclear-capable, liquid fuel medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM), with a range of 1,300 km.

May 1998: The U.S. State Department imposes two-year sanctions on Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) and Changgwang Sinyong Corporation of North Korea for cooperating on missile development.

May 1998: Pakistan conducts a series of underground tests of nuclear devices in response to recent Indian tests. The United States proceeds to implement sanctions, in place by November 1998, on a large number of Indian and Pakistani research, development, and production entities involved in space and missile technology.

July 1998: The Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States, led by Donald H. Rumsfeld, concludes that Pakistan has acquired production facilities to build the Ghauri (Hatf-V) MRBM, which is described as a version of the North Korean Nodong. It also concludes that Pakistan possesses M-11 missiles obtained from China and may be able to produce the "Tarmuk" missile based on the Chinese M-11.

August 1998: Pakistan claims it has recovered an American Tomahawk missile, which was fired during an American attack against terrorist camps in Afghanistan. Some Pakistani officials claim the find could help advance Pakistan's missile technology, but American defense officials disagree.

September 1998: Pakistan completes a mobile, re-usable launcher designed for use with the solid-fuel, nuclear capable Shaheen-I (Hatf-IV) short range ballistic missile (SRBM).

January 1999: Pakistan announces it is ready to test the Shaheen-I (Hatf-IV) missile. The solid fuel missile has a range of 750 kilometers, and is designed to counter India's nuclear capable Prithvi missiles.


June 2001: According to a senior U.S. nonproliferation official cited in the periodical Nuclear Fuel, experts from KRL and experts from North Korea are cooperating on the development of solid-fuel missiles.

July-December 2001: The U.S. Director of Central Intelligence's Unclassified Report to Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Relating to Weapons of Mass Destruction and Advanced Conventional Munitions reports that Chinese entities continue to provide "significant assistance," enabling Pakistan to move "toward serial production of solid-propellant SRBMs such as Shaheen-I and Haider-I." The report adds that Pakistan "needs continued Chinese assistance to support development of the two-stage Shaheen-II (Hatf-VI) MRBM."

August 2001: According to the Deputy Director of the CIA, John E. McLaughlin, North Korea transferred the 1,300 km-range Nodong ballistic missile to Pakistan.

September 2001: U.S. President George Bush lifts sanctions against India and Pakistan imposed after the 1998 nuclear tests.

May 2002: Pakistan reportedly successfully tests the Ghaznavi (Hatf-III) missile for the first time. The short-range, surface-to-surface missile is reportedly capable of carrying a nuclear weapon and has a range of 290 km. The Ghaznavi is reportedly based on the Chinese M-11.

May 2002: Pakistan successfully test fires the Abdali (Hatf-II) missile for the first time. The short-range, surface-to-surface missile has a range of 180 km and can carry a nuclear warhead.

January-June 2003: The U.S. Director of Central Intelligence's Unclassified Report to Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Relating to Weapons of Mass Destruction and Advanced Conventional Munitions reports that Chinese entities continue to provide assistance for Pakistan's ballistic missile program despite a Chinese pledge to the United States in November 2000 to end such assistance to nuclear capable ballistic missile programs.


July 2004: During an interview with the periodical Asahi Shimbun, former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto is quoted as saying that Pakistan obtained missile technology from North Korea after Bhutto's December 1993 goodwill mission. Bhutto emphasizes that missiles were not exchanged for nuclear technology.


August 2005: India's Scientific Advisor to the Defense Minister states that Pakistan's Babur (Hatf-VII) cruise missile is not supersonic or indigenously developed as claimed by Pakistan. New Delhi Force, an independent Indian magazine, alleges that the Babur resulted from the transfer of technology from China's state-owned China National Precision Machinery Import and Export Corp. (CPMIEC) to Pakistan's state-owned National Development Complex (NDC).

January-December 2007: The U.S. Director of Central Intelligence's Unclassified Report to Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Relating to Weapons of Mass Destruction and Advanced Conventional Munitions reports that private Chinese companies continue to sell equipment usable in ballistic missile, chemical weapon, and nuclear weapon programs to Pakistan.





June 2008: The existence of digitized blueprints for a compact, sophisticated nuclear weapon on computers linked to the A.Q. Khan network becomes public. The New York Times reports that nuclear experts believe the small, allegedly Pakistani-origin weapon would fit on medium-range missiles such as Pakistan's Ghauri (Hatf-V) MRBM.

August 2009: According to the New York Times, the United States accuses Pakistan of illegally modifying American-made missiles to expand their ability to strike targets on land. An unannounced Pakistani missile test in April, detected by U.S. intelligence agencies, has led the United States to suspect Pakistan of modifying Harpoon anti-ship missiles sold to Pakistan in the 1980s.

April 2010: According to The Australian, Canberra blocks a shipment of two atomic absorption spectrophotometers by GBC Scientific Equipment to a Pakistani engineering company, citing concerns that the machines could be used to analyze metals used for centrifuges and missiles.

January-December 2011: The U.S. Director of Central Intelligence's Unclassified Report to Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Relating to Weapons of Mass Destruction and Advanced Conventional Munitions reports that Chinese entities, "primarily private companies and individuals," continue to export missile-related equipment to Pakistan, and that China's state-owned firms continue to serve as key suppliers of advanced conventional weapons to Pakistan.



August 2011: Pakistan's first communications satellite, the PakSat-1R, developed jointly by SUPARCO and the China Great Wall Industry Corporation (CGWIC), is launched aboard a Chinese SLV from the Xichang Satellite Launch Center.

September 2011: Reports emerge that Chinese firms have sold or have attempted to sell equipment to Pakistan that could be used in its ballistic missile program. These transactions include: an illegal sale by the Chinese firm Polytechnologies of a coil-winding device and specialized optical chips to Pakistan's Advanced Engineering and Research Organization; a planned sale of machinery by the Chinese company Jinan Metal Forming Machinery Engineering Co. to Pakistani defense organizations; and an attempted sale of 2,200 pounds of specialty steel by a Chinese company to Pakistan's Aginel Enterprises.

January 2012: Nadeem Aktar is sentenced by a judge in Maryland to 37 months in prison followed by two years of supervised release for illegally exporting nuclear-related materials to restricted entities in Pakistan. These transactions included the supplying of 90 fixed coaxial attenuators to SUPARCO.





September 2014: The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) adds Pakistan's Advanced Engineering Research Organization (AERO) and eight of its affiliate organizations to the U.S. Entity List for illegally procuring U.S.-origin items in support of Pakistan's development of missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The eight affiliate organizations are Vortex Electronics (Australia), Beijing Lion Heart International Trading Company (China and Hong Kong), Future Systems Pvt. Ltd. (Pakistan), IKAN Engineering Services (Pakistan), LT Engineering and Trade Services (Pvt) Ltd. (LTE) (Pakistan), Nazir and Sons International (Pakistan), Orion Eleven Pvt. Ltd. (Pakistan), and Izix Group Pte Ltd. (Singapore).

 

[vinuzap]

this mullah is trying to implicate this history of thiefness is indigeneous and the benajir this terrorist is quoting :

July 2004: During an interview with the periodical Asahi Shimbun, former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto is quoted as saying that Pakistan obtained missile technology from North Korea after Bhutto's December 1993 goodwill mission. Bhutto emphasizes that missiles were not exchanged for nuclear technology.

 

[Kshatriya87]

Dude our Missile program started around 1991 it is now pretty much 26 to 27 year old. It was slow in first few years specially under Benzair Government and even Musharraf stopped few projects but we are working on developing Missiles for years now. MIRV didn't came out of no where we were developing it for quite some time. As Zubair Hayat who is CJOC formerly headed our SPD and now as CJOC he is also fully in charge of nuclear program we are revealing our Missiles which were not being revealed as we were more close to USA formerly but as we are changing sides so now we are coming up and showing our new weapons. Don't worry soon new Cruise Missiles and other Missiles will also be tested. Ababeel is just the beginning.

Ok. Lets say we agree on the above. Now please explain to me how an MIRV capable missile works in 2200km range. Also explain to me how ALL parameters of the missile are tested in a single launch.

 

[warrior monk]

All of us know, by means of publically available / declassified data that in 1999 when India dared to venture into the zone of Nuclear Testing it had acute contempt for the notion that Pakistan has the capacity to reciprocate its provocation by an equivalent & befitting response. Ajai K. Rai in “India’s Nuclear Diplomacy After Pokhran II” reveals that there existed a certain unanimity, with the exception of one or two, in India’s defence & political establishment that Pakistan does not possess the capacity to test a nuclear device and that it’s muscle-flexing and gestures are a mere Bluff. Sadly for India and for the peace-nicks across the globe this perception was erroneously void of any merit

Moron normally preparation for nuclear tests takes over 7 to 9 months to prepare but Pakistan did it in a little over 20 days begs the question How is that possible ??

As Sputnik recently put it Pakistan and India are currently competing for a race of ballistic supremacy in South-Asia. Both the nation states are on a spree of missiles testing that continues unabated and has no foreseeable end. It seems like India’s resolve to pose herself as a hegemon and Pakistan’s decision to confront her, by cutting her (India) to her size, has triggered the latest saga off. While the world watches with concern and players of international significance express their displeasure and call for restraint, India prima-facie has decided to walk along a destructive path, the path of delusion. While celebrating with uttermost joy its own half-baked missiles, many of which routinely fail to achieve the desired objectives India’s propaganda machine has decided to flout claims made by Pakistan and thus knit a self-wrapping web of delusion which makes it adapt the ostrich strategy of denial.

What are you smoking you should share , Indian missiles inferior to pakistani Missiles and they routinely fail ,your stanford binet i.q ratings must be off the charts please inform us inferior beings how Indian missiles are inferior ??

So in lieu with what was apparent, Pakistan tested its nascent version of “Ababeel” which employed Multi Independent Re-entry Vehicle (MIRV) technology, thereby Pakistan demonstrated its capacity to defeat the very Fundamental Doctrine of Indian Missile Defence and ensured the survivability of its indigenous missiles program thus restoring the faulting realms of strategic balance via Nuclear Deterrence.

Prove that it has MIRV capability ?? Just having a larger payload fairing on an extra stage on the Saheen 3 twin stages dosen't prove MIRV capability .

1. The author by having a bird’s eye view of the Missile’s imagery has concluded that, Pakistan has in-fact fielded Shaheen-II ballistic missile and reclaimed it as Ababeel, the author further supplements the claim by critically examining the range of Ababeel and finding it to be in close proximity of Shaheen-II.

It does have the Saheen 3 stages with an extra stage and a larger payload fairing of around 1.8 M dia . Prove it otherwise ??

The author is infected with the thought that Pakistan is unable to develop missile technology on its own; this figment of thought stands in sharp contrast to the established facts which ascertain that Pakistan’s nuclear and missile technology is indigenous and self-reliable. The author further ignores the fact that recently declassified CIA documents establish the attribute that China and Pakistan have an extremely deep-rooted strategic relationship which transgresses the boundaries of conventional cooperation.

No doubt about that Chinese have helped you in it.

Pakistan’s development of small low-yield nuclear weapons is a fact which is both established and well acknowledged across the globe, the author’s poor knowledge in this regard is a reflection of his limited or nonexistent exposure.

Prove it you have miniaturized warheads ?? Plutonium is required which you have not tested now here is the biggest question how are you making Plutonium warheads without testing it even once ?????
This is the biggest question answer it .

 

[HariPrasad-1]

Article is not shit you have no answer because you are full of delusions

Hummmmm When a country do not have a capability to design a 100 cc moped engine makes tall claims and claim something which even US or russia has not done, I am not the one to go in detail and waste my time. You can believe whatever makes you happy. Pakistan is such a nation in which people have their own version and conspiracy theory on every topic. Today an idiot pakistani has said that Pakistan has the capability to put 150 satellite in space. Being a democracy, we uphold the feeling of people. You can believe in whatever make you happy.

 

[Indx TechStyle]

Edit: I know you won't be responding to me so please at least reply the lines I posted in red color (if you really can). You have declared many things in your useless post with your loud mouth which pushed my tea on mouth directly on my mobile screen.
Response to high jumping Pakistanis with zero technical knowledge claiming that they have msde everything in secret
(Plus I'm not going to waste my entire day in typing this long piece of $hit by you where you have not talked anything technical so far, none of a single line in your article proves that you can make MIRVs, you only bashed author)

LAUGHTER THERAPY SERVES NO CURE: INDIA’S DELUSIONAL RESPONSE TO PAKISTAN’S TECTONIC LEAP IN MISSILE TECHNOLOGY


Formulated in the early 17th century and most fondly played up until now, Bluff is a game of acute deception. Proclaiming an upper hand, boasting thy credentials and starring through the adversary’s soul are tactics and skills which a Bluffer employees to psychologically obliterate his foe and provoke him into making the bellicose move. The adversary or “Gazer” as he may be referred to, minutely observes gestures, expressions and gesticulations manifested by the Bluffers, in a shrewd attempt to understand and asses his capacity and ability to maneuver. The game lingers on and the statuesque remains intact, up-until the point when one player decides to close with and confront the other on his “Claim.” This move “Show” as they call it, decisively turns the table on either the “Bluffer” or the “Gazer” and it is this detrimental and conclusively resultant nature which both signifies this move and adds to its credentials. Players throughout the past centuries have always kept this move in high esteem, only and solely to be employed when all ifs and buts stand answered and no doubt lingers whatsoever with respect to the ingenuity of the adversary’s claim.

In Bluff It Is Not Merely The Strength Of The Foe Which Demands Respect It Is Also The Very Notion Of It Which Does.

Bluff in the contemporary linguistics is no more a nomenclature associated with a set of boring cards, Bluff is a craft, rather art which is employed and applied in almost every major walk of modern life. Be it corporate manipulations, be it astute diplomacy or be it the vicious blazes of war, the idol of bluff stands tall at every other square of cosmos. It is this phenomenon which has not only made critical decision making much more onerous at the highest levels of administrative state-craft but has also intensified the realms of restraint. In the obsolete days of card-playing a wrong call of “Show” could at most cost a player the game and the gamble involved with it but given the viscosity of affairs in the Post-Manhattan world a Wrong Call can come too high a cost for any perpetual player be it an industry, a corporation or a major nation state. Late President Saddam’s ludicrous calling of the American Bluff in Qatar War led to Operation Desert Storm. Saddam Hussain, The Ba’ath Party and the Iraqi Armed Forces suffered colossal and irrevocable damages owing to the fact that America Wasn’t Bluffing. This incident alone speaks volumes about the inevitability of precaution when it comes to assessing the adversary’s “Claim.”

The phenomenon of bluff has been at play at the politico-diplomatic horizon of South-Asia right from the beginning of the post-partition era. Any keen student of this “Interesting Region (Chinese Phrase)” knows how both the principal arch-rivals of this area have been waging a mammoth psychological war for over the last 70 odd years. India & Pakistan have both played Bluff with eye balls locked and their hands lying on perilous draggers as the world watched in horror. History stands testimonial to the fact that in this battle of the nerves India has many-a-times run short of the requisite temperament and blinked first when it amounted to “A Call.” All of us know, by means of publically available / declassified data that in 1999 when India dared to venture into the zone of Nuclear Testing it had acute contempt for the notion that Pakistan has the capacity to reciprocate its provocation by an equivalent & befitting response. Ajai K. Rai in “India’s Nuclear Diplomacy After Pokhran II” reveals that there existed a certain unanimity, with the exception of one or two, in India’s defence & political establishment that Pakistan does not possess the capacity to test a nuclear device and that it’s muscle-flexing and gestures are a mere Bluff. Sadly for India and for the peace-nicks across the globe this perception was erroneously void of any merit. Pakistan within days of Pokhran-II undertook Chaghi-I and the new factor of nuclear-parity was introduced in the strategic climate of South-Asia. India despite having a proportionally large and well supplied military lost its conventional edge due to its own lunacy. Just as in Desert Strom Saddam came to realize America’s strength post-call, in Chaghi India came to comprehend with all her amazement what its ages old rival had actually achieved. The statements of Indian policy-makers pre and post Chaghi are a reflection of the shock–wave which ran across the hearts and minds of a wishful nation. For many days India expressed doubts regarding the authenticity of Pakistani claims but gradually the mourning did set in where it was due.

As Sputnik recently put it Pakistan and India are currently competing for a race of ballistic supremacy in South-Asia. Both the nation states are on a spree of missiles testing that continues unabated and has no foreseeable end. It seems like India’s resolve to pose herself as a hegemon and Pakistan’s decision to confront her, by cutting her (India) to her size, has triggered the latest saga off. While the world watches with concern and players of international significance express their displeasure and call for restraint, India prima-facie has decided to walk along a destructive path, the path of delusion. While celebrating with uttermost joy its own half-baked missiles, many of which routinely fail to achieve the desired objectives India’s propaganda machine has decided to flout claims made by Pakistan and thus knit a self-wrapping web of delusion which makes it adapt the ostrich strategy of denial.

Pakistan successfully tested the sea based variant of its cruise missile namely Babur-3 on the 09th day of January 2017. The test which was undertaken by a submarine based launcher in the Arabian Sea successfully produced the desired results as per the prism of design and development. The successful testing of Babur-3 had a monumental significance especially with regard to the fact that it introduced in South-Asian Nuclear-Realpolitik the factor of credible second strike. Pakistan had long been hearkening for this ability and its efforts to achieve it were neither hidden from international observers, who extensively wrote about it, nor from the monitoring agencies who formally expressed the fear of escalation. Given this background India’s reaction to such a test should have been composed, articulate, subtle and befitting but instead what came about was a hilarious comedy of errors. A certain self-proclaimed satellite imagery expert on twitter with the handle @rajfortyseven claimed that by mere power of naked-eye, he has managed to visually decrypt the fact that Pakistan has conducted a pseudo-test of the said cruise missile. The revelation was neither supplemented by any numerical data nor was it scientifically argued, to add to the flavor of this exposé absolutely no personal or academic credentials of this so-called Expert were either available on twitter or anywhere else. The account which has a bleak following of over 3 Thousand even does not have a full-name or a picture to associate with. The mega-investigator @rajfortyseven is thus a Twitter account with no more merits that that of @TomAndJerry007 or @hulk, accounts such as these are normally administered by high school punks or designated propaganda cells, the babbling that occurs at them neither deserves an ear nor a spared moment. However in disregard of any press ethics and without the fear of damaging their own journalistic credibility, all Indian newspapers deemed it fit to propagate the “Startling Exposure” that had taken place. @rajfortyseven featured on the front page of mainstream Indian Press and still without any credentials. By stories titled “Twitter Laughs Off Pakistani Claims” Indian media made itself a laughing stock for the entire world.

The opera of glaring ignorance didn’t stop right there, on the 24th day of January 2017 Pakistan tested the much awaited “Ababeel Missile”. Awaited as we call it because ever since India tested the “ASHWIN” Advanced Air & Ballistic Missile Defence Mechanism, several notable and reputed observers expressed their apprehension that Pakistan will sooner rather than later restore the strategic balance by fielding a Multiple War-Head Missile. A Voice of America Report dated May the 19th 2016 and Titled “False Sense of Security” had cautioned India that given geographical parameters and restraints of South-Asia no missile defence system in India can credibly lay-off the Pakistani ballistic-threat, the report went on to say that India’s experimentation in this regard and her blatantly un-veiled ambitions will provoke Pakistan into improvising with the existent arsenal of nuclear weapons delivery systems. So in lieu with what was apparent, Pakistan tested its nascent version of “Ababeel” which employed Multi Independent Re-entry Vehicle (MIRV) technology, thereby Pakistan demonstrated its capacity to defeat the very Fundamental Doctrine of Indian Missile Defence and ensured the survivability of its indigenous missiles program thus restoring the faulting realms of strategic balance via Nuclear Deterrence. Indian defence and military establishment rather than comprehending the newly emerged reality and strategically complying thereof by devising new policies, decided to run another smear campaign, the head and tail of which seem to be interlocked. An arbitrary piece origins of which are unknown and whose author is anonymous, appeared on a website (Indian Defence News) closely related to the Indian military. The piece titled “IDN TAKE: PAKISTAN SAYS IT TESTED MIRV TECHNOLOGY, INDIA LAUGHS” is a cluster of hilarious and absurd jokes.

The anonymous author who seems to be void of both technical and academic knowledge has tried to draw analogy out of thin air. Given herein under is an account of the major objections the anonymous author has leveled in his piece and the absurdity that resides therein:


1. The author by having a bird’s eye view of the Missile’s imagery has concluded that, Pakistan has in-fact fielded Shaheen-II ballistic missile and reclaimed it as Ababeel, the author further supplements the claim by critically examining the range of Ababeel and finding it to be in close proximity of Shaheen-II.

■ The author fails to recollect that similar Indian publications also raised doubts on the accuracy and viability of Shaheen-II when it was first tested in 2004, now to call Ababeel a duplication of Shaheen-II is not only hilarious but preposterous to say the least. The author further does not offer any explanation as to the reason why Pakistan could not have doctored the perpetual range of the subject missile in its claim, if the test indeed would have been non-existent.


2. The author expresses fascination over how China could transfer such a crucial and paramount technology to Pakistan despite her longstanding relationship with her.

■ The author is infected with the thought that Pakistan is unable to develop missile technology on its own; this figment of thought stands in sharp contrast to the established facts which ascertain that Pakistan’s nuclear and missile technology is indigenous and self-reliable. The author further ignores the fact that recently declassified CIA documents establish the attribute that China and Pakistan have an extremely deep-rooted strategic relationship which transgresses the boundaries of conventional cooperation.



3. The author argues that MIRV would require much smaller nuclear warheads which can be mounted for multiple-dispersion.


■ Pakistan’s development of small low-yield nuclear weapons is a fact which is both established and well acknowledged across the globe, the author’s poor knowledge in this regard is a reflection of his limited or nonexistent exposure.



4. The author hilariously argues that the range of an MIRV should be longer than what Ababeel has claimed.


■ The objection is obtuse and reflective of an ignorant mind which does not know or understand strategic aspects. Pakistan’s Missiles set their range in accordance with the very clearly defined Prospective Target that is India. Pakistan’s increase in the range of its missile would only be detrimental to its own interests as it would invoke fear in the minds of its apparent allies. Ababeel’s Range in well within Pakistan’s defined doctrine of defence and is rationally coherent. Furthermore the mechanics of MIRV have no proportional relationship with the dynamics of range; Jericho-3 (Israel’s MIRV) is a glittering example.


5. The author expresses amazement to the fact that Pakistan unlike never reports the failure of any of its missiles. The author thus inferences that Pakistan’s test might have failed but an adverse claim has been lodged.


■ The objection more or less seems to remorse on India’s domestic missile industry which is infected by the parasite of corruption and is thus rendered significantly disabled. Pakistan has complete tele-metric data of its successful missile tests and the same are monitored by the observatory mechanics of CENTCOM. The quality of Pakistan’s missiles is well-acknowledged and regarded across the globe and the same cannot be daunted by the failure of its neighbor.


In view of the foregoing one is drawn to the conclusion that the article titled “IDN TAKE: PAKISTAN SAYS IT TESTED MIRV TECHNOLOGY, INDIA LAUGHS” is nothing but a sadist piece of lit-erotica. The anonymous author who seems to be part and partial of the Indian propaganda machinery has merely tried in vain to brush-off the baggage of continuous failure that have piled up the back of the Indian military. The exercise seems to be a quintessential assignment which aims to create a delusional spell around the Indian populous and the privileged elite. It seems that a Narcotic-Analgesic is being self-injection into the nervous system of the Indian Security Prism whereby it would be easier for the establishment to adapt an ostrich policy and remain indifferent to the developing equation.

Without prejudice to the equity of diplomacy, one must advice India to walk on the path of realism rather than delusion. Pakistan’s strategic capacity to obliterate India remains intact and internationally visible. It shall remain unaffected from the Indian propaganda and will not falter by the appreciation of India or vice-versa. India must not consider Pakistan’s upper hand a bluff and should neither call her a Show. Any such bellicose move might drive the gamble out of her hand and into the Pakistan ambit.

In A Quintessential Fashion Right When India’s Aiming To Blink, Pakistan Is Not

Bluffing.

Word "Bluff" used in a single post = 15 times
(How desperate you are)
LOL, is that best you could come with?
No critical challenge, just bluff (though that internet terrorist @safriz [known as @shaheenmissile on Twitter & PDF], analyzes first section of video and declares thrust of PDV is weaker than Arrow [never mind if this cheater played both videos at different times]).
As there is nothing technical in your post.

1. Linear Implosion based devices, but you are yet to create Swan or Spherical Implosion. So could you miniaturize warheads for missiles? No, otherwise you must have those.
2. No Spin stablized boosters, advanced gyro or accelerometers. How your MIRVs will go up then? Have you arranged a crane in orbit to pull it (missile) up?
3. Where are your heat shields? You are putting MIRVs on an MRBM, so you'll need even better shields.
4. The adapter issue.
5. Thrust vectoring control systems? show me those.
6. gimballed thrust engine in pbcv, have you ever even designed one in history? Leave alone making them.

LAUGHTER THERAPY SERVES NO CURE: INDIA’S DELUSIONAL RESPONSE TO PAKISTAN’S TECTONIC LEAP IN MISSILE TECHNOLOGY

Technically "leaped" Pakistan makes just 40 out of 94 classified missile technologies in world unlike USA, Russia, China, France, India, Britain & Japan who do it close or above 90.

Formulated in the early 17th century and most fondly played up until now, Bluff is a game of acute deception. Proclaiming an upper hand, boasting thy credentials and starring through the adversary’s soul are tactics and skills which a Bluffer employees to psychologically obliterate his foe and provoke him into making the bellicose move. The adversary or “Gazer” as he may be referred to, minutely observes gestures, expressions and gesticulations manifested by the Bluffers, in a shrewd attempt to understand and asses his capacity and ability to maneuver. The game lingers on and the statuesque remains intact, up-until the point when one player decides to close with and confront the other on his “Claim.” This move “Show” as they call it, decisively turns the table on either the “Bluffer” or the “Gazer” and it is this detrimental and conclusively resultant nature which both signifies this move and adds to its credentials. Players throughout the past centuries have always kept this move in high esteem, only and solely to be employed when all ifs and buts stand answered and no doubt lingers whatsoever with respect to the ingenuity of the adversary’s claim.

As per Zarvan chacha in brief:
"India is provoking Pakistan to show it's real power so that Pak gets sanctions."
Let me do you a favour. If you can really launch MIRVs from MRBMs, means you can throw it in space. MRBM will need a super high altitude to deliver vehicles, in fact space.

Go ahead, throw a satellite in space, all folks will be silent!
Your last line:

buts stand answered and no doubt lingers whatsoever with respect to the ingenuity of the adversary’s claim.

I agree that we must not underestimate enemy and prepare for worst case scenario but if tomorrow Burundi says its howitzer can take on ATAGS, I'm not going to digest it.
Second, we don't even think you adversaries. You are 31st "State" in Republic of India!:biggrin2:

In Bluff It Is Not Merely The Strength Of The Foe Which Demands Respect It Is Also The Very Notion Of It Which Does.

But we don't respect you nor ever asked from you. Leave our way.

Bluff in the contemporary linguistics is no more a nomenclature associated with a set of boring cards, Bluff is a craft, rather art which is employed and applied in almost every major walk of modern life. Be it corporate manipulations, be it astute diplomacy or be it the vicious blazes of war, the idol of bluff stands tall at every other square of cosmos. It is this phenomenon which has not only made critical decision making much more onerous at the highest levels of administrative state-craft but has also intensified the realms of restraint. In the obsolete days of card-playing a wrong call of “Show” could at most cost a player the game and the gamble involved with it but given the viscosity of affairs in the Post-Manhattan world a Wrong Call can come too high a cost for any perpetual player be it an industry, a corporation or a major nation state. Late President Saddam’s ludicrous calling of the American Bluff in Qatar War led to Operation Desert Storm. Saddam Hussain, The Ba’ath Party and the Iraqi Armed Forces suffered colossal and irrevocable damages owing to the fact that America Wasn’t Bluffing. This incident alone speaks volumes about the inevitability of precaution when it comes to assessing the adversary’s “Claim.”

We never said we won't be cautious.
India already got that.
Pakistani jumping on one side but taking out a subsonic cruise missile with CIWS (in fact supersonics) and taking MIRVs out of atmosphere isn't that difficult for India. Our reconnaissance sats have resolutions in centimeters to track your missile before launch.
Adding, someone is comparing Iraq with India and Pakistan with USA. Not even worth mentioning, we have such things you haven't heard their names ever! :biggrin2:

India & Pakistan have both played Bluff with eye balls locked and their hands lying on perilous draggers as the world watched in horror.

They watched with popcorn, not horror and so are Indians.
It may only be "horror" for Pakistanis because they know,
Who will become USA & who will become Iraq.
Next time, don't make silly comparisons.

when India dared to venture into the zone of Nuclear Testing it had acute contempt for the notion that Pakistan has the capacity to reciprocate its provocation by an equivalent & befitting response.

Which sort of "response"? Pakistan comes last in India's mind. It's Pakistan having India centric policies, not vice versa.

Ajai K. Rai in “India’s Nuclear Diplomacy After Pokhran II” reveals that there existed a certain unanimity, with the exception of one or two, in India’s defence & political establishment that Pakistan does not possess the capacity to test a nuclear device and that it’s muscle-flexing and gestures are a mere Bluff.

Sadly for India and for the peace-nicks across the globe this perception was erroneously void of any merit.

Sadly, I can provide you source for centrifuges, fissile material, reactor parts transferred. It was worst kept secret l.
Comparing it with Ababeel is silly.

Pakistan within days of Pokhran-II undertook Chaghi-I and the new factor of nuclear-parity was introduced in the strategic climate of South-Asia.

Parity? Sure, how many supercomputers for simulation, HWRs & PWRs you have made?
Can you make a single thing like FBR or AHWR? Or any reactor comparable to IPWR series?

India despite having a proportionally large and well supplied military lost its conventional edge due to its own lunacy.

Sure, Pakistan has started operating one of largest armed forces in world, making Giant DDGs, FFGs, launching aircraft carriers, capable of reading car numbers of space, it has more troops, bigger Navy, more transport aircraft, helicopters, fighters, tanks etc..
Our Pakistani friends are so confident of themselves! India must pull out of Kashmir ASAP (with lot of sarcasm).
Hint: Now, this is called bluffing & Lunacy idiot! Morons like you are blessing for their enemy!

Just as in Desert Strom Saddam came to realize America’s strength post-call,

Half braincell will silly musings, though vice versa comparisons must be true among India vs Pakistan and America vs Iraq:

1. Two of them are world's largest functioning Democracies (US & India) without a single coup, their people breathe in Democracy since creation of regimes! other two (Iraq & Pakistan) are military dictatorships for longest times on planet!
2. Two of them operate their overseas military bases (US & India), other two are themselves other countries' bases
3. Two of them need other countries umbrella like China (Iraq & Pak), other two themselves are net security providers.
4. Two are biggies! Watching other two small countries on map is difficult!
5. Two are among world's major economies, other two are failed state struggling for existence.
6. Two are famous for screwing the sovereignty up of other countries, other two are their victims!:biggrin2:
7. Two of them have world's largest militaries & budgets, other two say only their "men are brave".
8. Two of them are donors of aid, other two are recipients.
9. Two of them are among richest in their regions, other two aren't able complete population census, so they don't know their population.
10. Two have tested nukes before you were born, other two are primitive even then not refrain from whinning.
11. Two of them have "Moon" in their flags, symbols & constitutions, other two have their flags on the Moon! (The Epic One :biggrin2
12. Two just screwed other twos up, other two keep saying you didn't properly defeat us.
13. Two are secular, other two are Sunni majority Islamic Regimes.
14. Two always dream off breaking and bleeding their "rivals" to thousand cuts but get their maps changed in end.
15. Two always try to compare themselves with other two. The other two? They also show Big Grins like me!

A lot more to list up. Or you can ask Americans or Iraqis themselves that whom among us they find like Iraq or America!

amazement what its ages old rival had actually achieved.

My amazement is that even if Pak existed ages ago idiot!

As Sputnik recently put it Pakistan and India are currently competing for a race of ballistic supremacy in South-Asia.

Anything comparing Pak with India will be swallowed by Pakistanis. I have no doubt.
(Case is different that India is making missiles reaching North Atlantic & East Asia, still we are occupied in South Asia!)
We are the 3/4th of this damned area called South Asia.

Both the nation states are on a spree of missiles testing that continues unabated and has no foreseeable end.

It will end sooner than you think.
Either, you'll go bankrupt or you will realize that you must stop before getting out of it. You already spend one third of your already strained budget on defence and you want to take on a country which is competely in different league.

It seems like India’s resolve to pose herself as a hegemon and Pakistan’s decision to confront her, by cutting her (India) to her size, has triggered the latest saga off.

"India’s resolve to pose herself as a hegemon and Pakistan’s decision to confront her"
Stupidest ever! Why you do take such decisions? Nobody wants to even notice you.

While the world watches with concern and players of international significance express their displeasure and call for restraint, India prima-facie has decided to walk along a destructive path, the path of delusion.

Who is asking you to follow our path? This path since last 30-40 years have only strengthned us, from a poor fourth world country with half of Pakistani GDP per capita to India of 2010s.

While celebrating with uttermost joy its own half-baked missiles,

Call our missiles half baked when you are able to make IR seekers, call them half baked when your test frequency is high, call them half baked when India IRBMs CEP stops being most accurate among all operational IRBMs, call them half baked when you can make turbofans for cruise missiles, call them half baked when you start making at least half of Indian Missile technology.

many of which routinely fail to achieve the desired objectives

LOL, at least we don't pass them out after 22kms test, we don't pass them out in few tests in only a single weather or climate, most important we at least dare to public failures.

India’s propaganda machine has decided to flout claims made by Pakistan and thus knit a self-wrapping web of delusion which makes it adapt the ostrich strategy of denial.

Our propaganda machines have found the failure multimedia of Ghauri missile and your Think Tanks have even admitted.:biggrin2:
ISPR finally gave a press release to confirm it.

Pakistan successfully tested the sea based variant of its cruise missile namely Babur-3 on the 09th day of January 2017.

Only launched, fell after launch.

The test which was undertaken by a submarine based launcher in the Arabian Sea successfully produced the desired results as per the prism of design and development.

As told before, no questioning, Pakistanis can swallow anything. You worst among all of them. You baselessly claimed that it used Agosta, neither confirmed from website nor analysts, you claimed you tested MIRVs in first attempt, again humiliated in press release on PDF.
Even your claims regarding Su35 & FN SCAR, you have made enough fun of yourself Zarvan.

the factor of credible second strike.

And you still complain why Indians laugh on you?

A 450km, (max upgradable to 1,000 kms, will take years) cruise missile, is your "credible" deterrence? I would have given some points that Babur-3 could hit Indian Coastal Cities if it was above Mach 3 but a subsonic missile?
Do you know what we call a CIWS?
It's easier for India for taking out subsonic cruise missiles than ballistic missiles.

but instead what came about was a hilarious comedy of errors.

Calling every technical point out a mockery, could even a single of you guys could tackle it? No. You just called everyone butthurt because you couldn't explain.

A certain self-proclaimed satellite imagery expert on twitter with the handle @rajfortyseven claimed that by mere power of naked-eye, he has managed to visually decrypt the fact that Pakistan has conducted a pseudo-test of the said cruise missile. The revelation was neither supplemented by any numerical data nor was it scientifically argued, to add to the flavor of this exposé absolutely no personal or academic credentials of this so-called Expert were either available on twitter or anywhere else. The account which has a bleak following of over 3 Thousand even does not have a full-name or a picture to associate with. The mega-investigator @rajfortyseven is thus a Twitter account with no more merits that that of @TomAndJerry007 or @hulk, accounts such as these are normally administered by high school punks or designated propaganda cells, the babbling that occurs at them neither deserves an ear nor a spared moment. However in disregard of any press ethics and without the fear of damaging their own journalistic credibility, all Indian newspapers deemed it fit to propagate the “Startling Exposure” that had taken place. @rajfortyseven featured on the front page of mainstream Indian Press and still without any credentials. By stories titled “Twitter Laughs Off Pakistani Claims” Indian media made itself a laughing stock for the entire world.

Missile test without a NOTAM or NAVAREA, who's laughing stock? Even a 10 years old child can say those are three different videos.
Foreigners laughing on Indians? Go on forums other than Pakistani or Indian! You will be surprised to face their questions.
Everyone has rejected the test at first place!
Go ahead, call them false flagger Indians.

The opera of glaring ignorance didn’t stop right there, on the 24th day of January 2017 Pakistan tested the much awaited “Ababeel Missile”. Awaited as we call it because ever since India tested the “ASHWIN” Advanced Air & Ballistic Missile Defence Mechanism, several notable and reputed observers expressed their apprehension that Pakistan will sooner rather than later restore the strategic balance by fielding a Multiple War-Head Missile.

Sorry for spoiling your party but have you ever heard of PDV?
AAD is an Endo Atmospheric kill vehicle. PDV can destroy missiles in outer space.

MIRV, MaRV or any type of warhead starts action only after it's heat shield is cooked up post atmospheric re entry. PDV simply doesn't give time to get activated.

A Voice of America Report dated May the 19th 2016 and Titled “False Sense of Security” had cautioned India

Voice of America, Sputnik News, you're in so much love insignificant sources.

that given geographical parameters and restraints of South-Asia no missile defence system in India can credibly lay-off the Pakistani ballistic-threat,

Seriously? Your MIRVs have become useless before you will bring them. Hitting to kill out of atmosphere nullifies effect.

Now, if you want to ask me about completely laying it off, let me inform you if India has got 87% elimination capability, then, you are that pathetic country who can only stick hopes to rest 13%.
Adding, you can't defend yourself against India. Even if you try, you'll get bankrupt l.

The piece titled “IDN TAKE: PAKISTAN SAYS IT TESTED MIRV TECHNOLOGY, INDIA LAUGHS” is a cluster of hilarious and absurd jokes.

You mean that they are lying and you have thrust vectoring controls, swan implosion based devices, efficient gyro and accelerometers, individual navigation & computer systems for each warhead, spin stabilized boosters and heat shields?

The anonymous author who seems to be void of both technical and academic knowledge has tried to draw analogy out of thin air. Given herein under is an account of the major objections the anonymous author has leveled in his piece and the absurdity that resides therein:

1. The author by having a bird’s eye view of the Missile’s imagery has concluded that, Pakistan has in-fact fielded Shaheen-II ballistic missile and reclaimed it as Ababeel, the author further supplements the claim by critically examining the range of Ababeel and finding it to be in close proximity of Shaheen-II.

■ The author fails to recollect that similar Indian publications also raised doubts on the accuracy and viability of Shaheen-II when it was first tested in 2004,

We still do. We even examine our own cuz it's India not a military dictatorship regime composed of 200 million fools who worships army like Gods and tends to believe whatever they say without questions.
Wreckage of missile isn't enough for you.

now to call Ababeel a duplication of Shaheen-II is not only hilarious but preposterous to say the least. The author further does not offer any explanation as to the reason why Pakistan could not have doctored the perpetual range of the subject missile in its claim, if the test indeed would have been non-existent.

Study about composites! Better for you.

2. The author expresses fascination over how China could transfer such a crucial and paramount technology to Pakistan despite her longstanding relationship with her.

Correct, your all declarations claim just a couple of days after Chinese Official Journo warned India to proliferate missile technologies.
Now, other thing is that China is yet to master it before it could leak MIRV to others.

■ The author is infected with the thought that Pakistan is unable to develop missile technology on its own;

Entire world is so. Have you ever run a single major program? Have you ever poured money into it? A country with insignificant R&D budget doesn't run missile programs unless it is proxy of war monger communist state like USSR or PRC. Like North Korea, Pakistan and Iran.

You will notice that they attained without having any extensive program or budget & their missile technologies never cross a certain line. Nor they could ever develop similar Techs in other sectors because they actually developed these missiles.

this figment of thought stands in sharp contrast to the established facts which ascertain that Pakistan’s nuclear and missile technology is indigenous and self-reliable.

Which established facts? Show me any non Pakistani source which says that Pakistani nuclear or missile technology is indigenous. Come on, any.
Established fact is that Pakistan got first missile by derivation of Rehbar given to SUPARCO in 60s by US. Fact is that China transferred reactor magnets & even fissile material to you.
Fact is that you can't make SLV because even you don't know which technology your missiles use.
Established fact is that you were given anything to nullify India given India being not very nice with US & PRC in cold war.
You have two choices:

1. IQ level of your scientists is lower than Indians. That's why could make an SLV if they really developed missile.
2. Pakistan derived and assembled foreign parts. Something understandable that why couldn't you do anything else with these toys.

The author further ignores the fact that recently declassified CIA documents establish the attribute that China and Pakistan have an extremely deep-rooted strategic relationship which transgresses the boundaries of conventional cooperation.

Are you contradicting yourself?

3. The author argues that MIRV would require much smaller nuclear warheads which can be mounted for multiple-dispersion.

■ Pakistan’s development of small low-yield nuclear weapons is a fact which is both established and well acknowledged across the globe, the author’s poor knowledge in this regard is a reflection of his limited or nonexistent exposure.

LOL and you are calling others delusional. Show me "global sources" which say miniaturization is something Pakistan can do.
"Established and well acknowledged" LOL
Just because you guys are taught bs doesn't necessarily mean entire world is.
Here's, putting in spoiler, click if you dare to read.

Spoiler: Click To Read

Pakistanis didn't test Plutonium warheads which are needed for miniaturization rather they tested HEU implosion type warheads to be replicated in plutonium type pit as New Labs facility at PINSTECH only came online.in may 1998 . So Pakistanis have not tested a Plutonium spherical implosion device but a Linear implosion device.

This device upon detonation the high explosive will drive the pusher plate into the tamper, which will then begin linear implosion of the fissile mass which will not only compress the plutonium but will push it inward and away from the control rods the same time, the lip on the outside of each control rod will "catch" a small portion of the force from the explosive.

You are nowhere near making miniature warhead. Your agencies just claim that.

4. The author hilariously argues that the range of an MIRV should be longer than what Ababeel has claimed.

If you are disagreeing with him, you are yourself being too hilarious and ignorant to be on a defence forum.

■ The objection is obtuse and reflective of an ignorant mind which does not know or understand strategic aspects. Pakistan’s Missiles set their range in accordance with the very clearly defined Prospective Target that is India. Pakistan’s increase in the range of its missile would only be detrimental to its own interests as it would invoke fear in the minds of its apparent allies. Ababeel’s Range in well within Pakistan’s defined doctrine of defence and is rationally coherent. Furthermore the mechanics of MIRV have no proportional relationship with the dynamics of range; Jericho-3 (Israel’s MIRV) is a glittering example.

You are too ignorant to understand that why all MIRV missiles are ICBMs.
MIRVs need time to expand. For an MRBM, you'll need an extremely high altitude for which you don't have equipment.

5. The author expresses amazement to the fact that Pakistan unlike never reports the failure of any of its missiles. The author thus inferences that Pakistan’s test might have failed but an adverse claim has been lodged.

Trust me, this author is just an anonymous Defence Enthusiast like other here on DFI.
If he couldn't get, doesn't necessarily mean we don't know about failures.

■ The objection more or less seems to remorse on India’s domestic missile industry which is infected by the parasite of corruption and is thus rendered significantly disabled.

Welcome back to the real world!
:bounce:
Perception of Corruption Index:
India: 79th
Pak: 116th

By your logic, USA, Russia, China, Israel, France, Japan & all other are corrupt because they have developmental failures.

(And yes, Indian Domestic industry has failed, no matter if it's share in defence sector has doubled, no matter if India's weapon exports have increased by 6 times in two years, :biggrin2: We are decaying from left to right, tip to toe.

Pakistan has complete tele-metric data of its successful missile tests and the same are monitored by the observatory mechanics of CENTCOM.

No, you don't have.

The quality of Pakistan’s missiles is well-acknowledged and regarded across the globe and the same cannot be daunted by the failure of its neighbor.

Ha ha
Pakistan calling Indian Missile tech lagging is like lamp calling sun dimmer!:biggrin2:

More pathetic are your friends @Neo and @Dazzler who liked this useless article.
Number of classified missile/UAV Technologies produced by the following nations out of total 94 technologies (2010 numbers, India has gone far above in 2017).

India : 81
Pakistan : 39
China : 92
Iran: 21
Israel: 74
Turkey: 4
USA:94
UK:94
Russia:94
France: 93
Japan: 93
Saudi Arabia:0
North Korea:25
South Africa : 34
South Korea: 42

We have such kind of missiles you never even heard names.
Ab kahin aur aisa article post mat kar diyo. Insult karalega.

In view of the foregoing one is drawn to the conclusion that the article titled “IDN TAKE: PAKISTAN SAYS IT TESTED MIRV TECHNOLOGY, INDIA LAUGHS” is nothing but a sadist piece of lit-erotica. The anonymous author who seems to be part and partial of the Indian propaganda machinery has merely tried in vain to brush-off the baggage of continuous failure that have piled up the back of the Indian military. The exercise seems to be a quintessential assignment which aims to create a delusional spell around the Indian populous and the privileged elite. It seems that a Narcotic-Analgesic is being self-injection into the nervous system of the Indian Security Prism whereby it would be easier for the establishment to adapt an ostrich policy and remain indifferent to the developing equation.

There is only one thing I could find in your article,
"IF WE ARE SAYING WE TESTED MIRVs,
INDIA MUST ACCEPT IT"
No technical countering (which you even can't).
Your hilarious rants like,
"this figment of thought stands in sharp contrast to the established facts which ascertain that Pakistan’s nuclear and missile technology is indigenous and self-reliable"

"Pakistan’s development of small low-yield nuclear weapons is a fact which is both established and well acknowledged across the globe, the author’s poor knowledge in this regard is a reflection of his limited or nonexistent exposure."
"The quality of Pakistan’s missiles is well-acknowledged and regarded across the globe and the same cannot be daunted by the failure of its neighbor."
Just reflects your own level of exposure to "globe". In fact, you have never read any news other than ISPR.




Only deserves middle fingers and the title,
Indx TechStyle's Take: Pakistani fanboy claims our missile "quality" is acknowledged across the globe and India is failed, entire world laughs
If you know, India was brought in MTCR for a reason, MTCR needed India more than India needed it, India has much more in any aspect compared to any other non NPT nation.

Your missile tech is world class? We are failed? Happy selling them. Happy making IR seekers, SLBMs or basic weapons like AAMs or torpedoes.

Without prejudice to the equity of diplomacy, one must advice India to walk on the path of realism rather than delusion.

"Established and acknowledged across the globe (missiles who can't even reach globe though), Pakistani Missiles"
Limits of delusions has been screwed already.:biggrin2:
Here's is just a small hint what globe thinks about you. Some Pakistani fanboy like you was so desperate to prove Pak equivalent to India.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Potential_superpowers/Archive_4#Pakistan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Potential_superpowers/Archive_4#Pls_add_Pakistan

Pakistan’s strategic capacity to obliterate India remains intact and internationally visible.

Strategic wish! Not capacity
Specially when India isn't even playing 1% of role what it can do.

 

[warrior monk]

@Indx TechStyle Don't make it complicated and Lengthy for @Zarvan he might get confused and put a fatwa on you.

 

[Indx TechStyle]

@Indx TechStyle Don't make it complicated and Lengthy for @Zarvan he might get confused and put a fatwa on you.

I'm a Kaffir!
Adding, I'm an atheist, kaffirest among the kaffirs. I don't follow any sort of fatwa.
Either, he'll digest or he'll f off!

 

[warrior monk]

I'm a Kaffir!
Adding, I'm an atheist, kaffirest among the kaffirs. I don't follow any sort of fatwa.
Either, he'll digest or he'll f off!

Me too , More of an agnostic though would like to err on the right side ( a La Pascal's wager ).

 

[dineshchaturvedi]

LAUGHTER THERAPY SERVES NO CURE: INDIA’S DELUSIONAL RESPONSE TO PAKISTAN’S TECTONIC LEAP IN MISSILE TECHNOLOGY


Formulated in the early 17th century and most fondly played up until now, Bluff is a game of acute deception. Proclaiming an upper hand, boasting thy credentials and starring through the adversary’s soul are tactics and skills which a Bluffer employees to psychologically obliterate his foe and provoke him into making the bellicose move. The adversary or “Gazer” as he may be referred to, minutely observes gestures, expressions and gesticulations manifested by the Bluffers, in a shrewd attempt to understand and asses his capacity and ability to maneuver. The game lingers on and the statuesque remains intact, up-until the point when one player decides to close with and confront the other on his “Claim.” This move “Show” as they call it, decisively turns the table on either the “Bluffer” or the “Gazer” and it is this detrimental and conclusively resultant nature which both signifies this move and adds to its credentials. Players throughout the past centuries have always kept this move in high esteem, only and solely to be employed when all ifs and buts stand answered and no doubt lingers whatsoever with respect to the ingenuity of the adversary’s claim.

In Bluff It Is Not Merely The Strength Of The Foe Which Demands Respect It Is Also The Very Notion Of It Which Does.

Bluff in the contemporary linguistics is no more a nomenclature associated with a set of boring cards, Bluff is a craft, rather art which is employed and applied in almost every major walk of modern life. Be it corporate manipulations, be it astute diplomacy or be it the vicious blazes of war, the idol of bluff stands tall at every other square of cosmos. It is this phenomenon which has not only made critical decision making much more onerous at the highest levels of administrative state-craft but has also intensified the realms of restraint. In the obsolete days of card-playing a wrong call of “Show” could at most cost a player the game and the gamble involved with it but given the viscosity of affairs in the Post-Manhattan world a Wrong Call can come too high a cost for any perpetual player be it an industry, a corporation or a major nation state. Late President Saddam’s ludicrous calling of the American Bluff in Qatar War led to Operation Desert Storm. Saddam Hussain, The Ba’ath Party and the Iraqi Armed Forces suffered colossal and irrevocable damages owing to the fact that America Wasn’t Bluffing. This incident alone speaks volumes about the inevitability of precaution when it comes to assessing the adversary’s “Claim.”

The phenomenon of bluff has been at play at the politico-diplomatic horizon of South-Asia right from the beginning of the post-partition era. Any keen student of this “Interesting Region (Chinese Phrase)” knows how both the principal arch-rivals of this area have been waging a mammoth psychological war for over the last 70 odd years. India & Pakistan have both played Bluff with eye balls locked and their hands lying on perilous draggers as the world watched in horror. History stands testimonial to the fact that in this battle of the nerves India has many-a-times run short of the requisite temperament and blinked first when it amounted to “A Call.” All of us know, by means of publically available / declassified data that in 1999 when India dared to venture into the zone of Nuclear Testing it had acute contempt for the notion that Pakistan has the capacity to reciprocate its provocation by an equivalent & befitting response. Ajai K. Rai in “India’s Nuclear Diplomacy After Pokhran II” reveals that there existed a certain unanimity, with the exception of one or two, in India’s defence & political establishment that Pakistan does not possess the capacity to test a nuclear device and that it’s muscle-flexing and gestures are a mere Bluff. Sadly for India and for the peace-nicks across the globe this perception was erroneously void of any merit. Pakistan within days of Pokhran-II undertook Chaghi-I and the new factor of nuclear-parity was introduced in the strategic climate of South-Asia. India despite having a proportionally large and well supplied military lost its conventional edge due to its own lunacy. Just as in Desert Strom Saddam came to realize America’s strength post-call, in Chaghi India came to comprehend with all her amazement what its ages old rival had actually achieved. The statements of Indian policy-makers pre and post Chaghi are a reflection of the shock–wave which ran across the hearts and minds of a wishful nation. For many days India expressed doubts regarding the authenticity of Pakistani claims but gradually the mourning did set in where it was due.

As Sputnik recently put it Pakistan and India are currently competing for a race of ballistic supremacy in South-Asia. Both the nation states are on a spree of missiles testing that continues unabated and has no foreseeable end. It seems like India’s resolve to pose herself as a hegemon and Pakistan’s decision to confront her, by cutting her (India) to her size, has triggered the latest saga off. While the world watches with concern and players of international significance express their displeasure and call for restraint, India prima-facie has decided to walk along a destructive path, the path of delusion. While celebrating with uttermost joy its own half-baked missiles, many of which routinely fail to achieve the desired objectives India’s propaganda machine has decided to flout claims made by Pakistan and thus knit a self-wrapping web of delusion which makes it adapt the ostrich strategy of denial.

Pakistan successfully tested the sea based variant of its cruise missile namely Babur-3 on the 09th day of January 2017. The test which was undertaken by a submarine based launcher in the Arabian Sea successfully produced the desired results as per the prism of design and development. The successful testing of Babur-3 had a monumental significance especially with regard to the fact that it introduced in South-Asian Nuclear-Realpolitik the factor of credible second strike. Pakistan had long been hearkening for this ability and its efforts to achieve it were neither hidden from international observers, who extensively wrote about it, nor from the monitoring agencies who formally expressed the fear of escalation. Given this background India’s reaction to such a test should have been composed, articulate, subtle and befitting but instead what came about was a hilarious comedy of errors. A certain self-proclaimed satellite imagery expert on twitter with the handle @rajfortyseven claimed that by mere power of naked-eye, he has managed to visually decrypt the fact that Pakistan has conducted a pseudo-test of the said cruise missile. The revelation was neither supplemented by any numerical data nor was it scientifically argued, to add to the flavor of this exposé absolutely no personal or academic credentials of this so-called Expert were either available on twitter or anywhere else. The account which has a bleak following of over 3 Thousand even does not have a full-name or a picture to associate with. The mega-investigator @rajfortyseven is thus a Twitter account with no more merits that that of @TomAndJerry007 or @hulk, accounts such as these are normally administered by high school punks or designated propaganda cells, the babbling that occurs at them neither deserves an ear nor a spared moment. However in disregard of any press ethics and without the fear of damaging their own journalistic credibility, all Indian newspapers deemed it fit to propagate the “Startling Exposure” that had taken place. @rajfortyseven featured on the front page of mainstream Indian Press and still without any credentials. By stories titled “Twitter Laughs Off Pakistani Claims” Indian media made itself a laughing stock for the entire world.

The opera of glaring ignorance didn’t stop right there, on the 24th day of January 2017 Pakistan tested the much awaited “Ababeel Missile”. Awaited as we call it because ever since India tested the “ASHWIN” Advanced Air & Ballistic Missile Defence Mechanism, several notable and reputed observers expressed their apprehension that Pakistan will sooner rather than later restore the strategic balance by fielding a Multiple War-Head Missile. A Voice of America Report dated May the 19th 2016 and Titled “False Sense of Security” had cautioned India that given geographical parameters and restraints of South-Asia no missile defence system in India can credibly lay-off the Pakistani ballistic-threat, the report went on to say that India’s experimentation in this regard and her blatantly un-veiled ambitions will provoke Pakistan into improvising with the existent arsenal of nuclear weapons delivery systems. So in lieu with what was apparent, Pakistan tested its nascent version of “Ababeel” which employed Multi Independent Re-entry Vehicle (MIRV) technology, thereby Pakistan demonstrated its capacity to defeat the very Fundamental Doctrine of Indian Missile Defence and ensured the survivability of its indigenous missiles program thus restoring the faulting realms of strategic balance via Nuclear Deterrence. Indian defence and military establishment rather than comprehending the newly emerged reality and strategically complying thereof by devising new policies, decided to run another smear campaign, the head and tail of which seem to be interlocked. An arbitrary piece origins of which are unknown and whose author is anonymous, appeared on a website (Indian Defence News) closely related to the Indian military. The piece titled “IDN TAKE: PAKISTAN SAYS IT TESTED MIRV TECHNOLOGY, INDIA LAUGHS” is a cluster of hilarious and absurd jokes.

The anonymous author who seems to be void of both technical and academic knowledge has tried to draw analogy out of thin air. Given herein under is an account of the major objections the anonymous author has leveled in his piece and the absurdity that resides therein:


1. The author by having a bird’s eye view of the Missile’s imagery has concluded that, Pakistan has in-fact fielded Shaheen-II ballistic missile and reclaimed it as Ababeel, the author further supplements the claim by critically examining the range of Ababeel and finding it to be in close proximity of Shaheen-II.

■ The author fails to recollect that similar Indian publications also raised doubts on the accuracy and viability of Shaheen-II when it was first tested in 2004, now to call Ababeel a duplication of Shaheen-II is not only hilarious but preposterous to say the least. The author further does not offer any explanation as to the reason why Pakistan could not have doctored the perpetual range of the subject missile in its claim, if the test indeed would have been non-existent.


2. The author expresses fascination over how China could transfer such a crucial and paramount technology to Pakistan despite her longstanding relationship with her.

■ The author is infected with the thought that Pakistan is unable to develop missile technology on its own; this figment of thought stands in sharp contrast to the established facts which ascertain that Pakistan’s nuclear and missile technology is indigenous and self-reliable. The author further ignores the fact that recently declassified CIA documents establish the attribute that China and Pakistan have an extremely deep-rooted strategic relationship which transgresses the boundaries of conventional cooperation.



3. The author argues that MIRV would require much smaller nuclear warheads which can be mounted for multiple-dispersion.


■ Pakistan’s development of small low-yield nuclear weapons is a fact which is both established and well acknowledged across the globe, the author’s poor knowledge in this regard is a reflection of his limited or nonexistent exposure.



4. The author hilariously argues that the range of an MIRV should be longer than what Ababeel has claimed.


■ The objection is obtuse and reflective of an ignorant mind which does not know or understand strategic aspects. Pakistan’s Missiles set their range in accordance with the very clearly defined Prospective Target that is India. Pakistan’s increase in the range of its missile would only be detrimental to its own interests as it would invoke fear in the minds of its apparent allies. Ababeel’s Range in well within Pakistan’s defined doctrine of defence and is rationally coherent. Furthermore the mechanics of MIRV have no proportional relationship with the dynamics of range; Jericho-3 (Israel’s MIRV) is a glittering example.


5. The author expresses amazement to the fact that Pakistan unlike never reports the failure of any of its missiles. The author thus inferences that Pakistan’s test might have failed but an adverse claim has been lodged.


■ The objection more or less seems to remorse on India’s domestic missile industry which is infected by the parasite of corruption and is thus rendered significantly disabled. Pakistan has complete tele-metric data of its successful missile tests and the same are monitored by the observatory mechanics of CENTCOM. The quality of Pakistan’s missiles is well-acknowledged and regarded across the globe and the same cannot be daunted by the failure of its neighbor.


In view of the foregoing one is drawn to the conclusion that the article titled “IDN TAKE: PAKISTAN SAYS IT TESTED MIRV TECHNOLOGY, INDIA LAUGHS” is nothing but a sadist piece of lit-erotica. The anonymous author who seems to be part and partial of the Indian propaganda machinery has merely tried in vain to brush-off the baggage of continuous failure that have piled up the back of the Indian military. The exercise seems to be a quintessential assignment which aims to create a delusional spell around the Indian populous and the privileged elite. It seems that a Narcotic-Analgesic is being self-injection into the nervous system of the Indian Security Prism whereby it would be easier for the establishment to adapt an ostrich policy and remain indifferent to the developing equation.

Without prejudice to the equity of diplomacy, one must advice India to walk on the path of realism rather than delusion. Pakistan’s strategic capacity to obliterate India remains intact and internationally visible. It shall remain unaffected from the Indian propaganda and will not falter by the appreciation of India or vice-versa. India must not consider Pakistan’s upper hand a bluff and should neither call her a Show. Any such bellicose move might drive the gamble out of her hand and into the Pakistan ambit.

In A Quintessential Fashion Right When India’s Aiming To Blink, Pakistan Is Not

Bluffing.

Bhai Pakistanis are gullible people they can be easily fooled. This is another example of that. Even if someone says my chacha told we have ICBM people on defense forum believe him. Bhai other than mazak Indians care too hoots about your fake missile. We very well know your capacity.

 

[Dovah]

Expect a Paki with no idea how technology works to write this piece of garbage. Tectonic leap lol.

 

[Indx TechStyle]

1. Pakistanis make primitive linear implosion based device and declare themselves ahead of India.
2. Pakistanis start to make assemble short range missiles, declare themselves ahead of India.

Just imagine when they will make their first SLV:
Mere azeez hamwatno, Is launch ke baad Pakistan ek aitmi kuwwat ke saath saath gardish mein sahlaayi mission bhejne waala waahid musalmaan mulk ban gaya hai. Alhamdulillha yeh humaare sciencedaano ke josh, jazabe aur imaan ka saboot hai aur iske saath humne india ko bhi pachaard diya hai....

Inshallah, Cheen is agla rocket milne par.....merrraa matlab hai...humaare sciendaano ke naya rocket taiyaar karne par hum 3 kilo kebajaaye 4 kilo ki satellite launch kar sakeinge.
Thanks @mayfair