sayareakd
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 17,734
- Likes
- 18,952
Once a Good Judge said that if you want to become good Judge, you should have good nose to know what is cooking.saya read the last page , he has prayed to treat the letter as a PIL in the relief clause, but you are right he should have enclosed his affidavit, while he has not.
However the SC can take it as a PIL and ask to submit his affidavit in this regard later.
Now please understand that Letter PIL is extreme case, where the person cannot reach justice or does not have financial or other means to approach justice, in this case the person making allegations has all the means and he knows the procedure for the same. Be as it may, we all know the procedure for the removal of sitting Supreme Court Judge. The allegations against the Hon'ble Judge pertains to 2009 if that is the case, a RAW/IB report of the event must have been send to the Ministry of Law. He has not produce any evidence to support such lecture was delivered by him. Plus he has based his letter on some third persons affidavit. The case he mentions are very sensitive cases and way in which this letter was leaked, only smell rat.