Pakistan Economy: News & Discussion
- Thread starter A.V.
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
- Messages
- 2,076
- Likes
- 4,006
and other paki consperncy in 1 2 3........
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2017
- Messages
- 984
- Likes
- 1,969
Pakistan China's new colony? Leaked papers reveal Beijing's stake in economy, key projects
When Mao Zedong's People's Liberation Army marched into the restive Muslim-majority region on China's western frontier in 1949, the Chairman decided to christen the People's Republic's newest province Xinjiang, literally meaning 'new frontier'- a historical name used intermittently for China's borderlands. Today, for many in Beijing, Pakistan is China's new new frontier. If the 20-year blueprint envisioned by China's leaders and Pakistan's current government comes to fruition, Beijing will soon have a say in how almost every aspect of the Pakistani economy is run.
In the three years since the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project was launched, this transformation has already begun to unfold. A draft CPEC masterplan, conceived of by China's National Development and Reform Commission and Pakistan's ministry of planning and published by Pakistan's Dawn newspaper, and the most sweeping Chinese assessment till date about the project- an internal review undertaken by Beijing's Renmin University and shared with India Today- both underline the enormous scale of the planned economic takeover, from roads and power plants to even agricultural projects.
PAKISTAN'S NEW OLD FRIEND
Today, Chinese companies are building and managing the country's key transport networks, from national highways to Lahore's metro rail. China has bought a stake in Pakistan's stock exchange. It is building Pakistan's power sector, coal plant by coal plant, and will eventually, many experts believe, have a say in how much Pakistani citizens pay their government for electricity.
Ties between China and Pakistan go back to the early 1960s, a relationship forged in their mutual animosity towards India in the wake of their respective wars. Since then, both governments, and particularly militaries, have developed close relations. China has supported Pakistan as a counterweight to India in South Asia, most notably through its continuing support of the country's nuclear programme. China, however, fell out of prominence in the wake of America's 'war on terror' after the September 11, 2001 attacks. This also coincided with Beijing more carefully balancing its growing relations with India after the 1988 normalisation of ties. In the years following 9/11, the US began leaning heavily on Pakistan for its war in Afghanistan, emerging as the biggest financial donor.
That is now no longer the case. China has now replaced the US as Pakistan's biggest benefactor. The launch of CPEC has only further reinforced this position: China's trade with Pakistan has already risen threefold in the past few years, to $13.7 billion in 2015-16, up from just $4 billion in 2007. Today, China accounts for 40 per cent of Pakistan's foreign direct investment, which is only around $2 billion. According to the Pakistani government, it was China's $600 million that contributed to a 38 per cent rise in FDI in 2015-'16.
Graphics by TANMOY CHAKRABORTY
THE TAKEOVER BLUEPRINT
CPEC will usher in an even more sweeping takeover of the Pakistani economy. A draft masterplan says thousands of acres of Pakistani land will be transferred to Chinese companies to grow crops, build meat processing plants and develop free trade zones. Chinese garment factories will, en masse, be transferred to Pakistan, while China will manage and run tourism projects and special economic zones along the southern coast, with rather ambitious plans for even yacht clubs and hot spring hotels to develop an unlikely tourism hub in the restive Balochistan province, of all places.
"There are fears that Pakistan will become just another province of China, or will be reduced to being a 'vassal state'," S. Akbar Zaidi, a leading Pakistani political economist and professor at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs, has argued in a paper.
For Beijing, the stakes are high. The internal assessment by Renmin University's Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, which sent scholars to visit Pakistan and study CPEC projects late last year, warned of numerous risks, from political infighting in Pakistan to terrorism. The report, however, came to the final conclusion that the only way for China to guarantee success is to assume even more sweeping control.
'Neither China nor Pakistan can afford the consequences of the failure of constructing the corridor,' the Chinese report concluded. 'If the current uncertainty was to continue, it would not only delay the opening of the flagship project but CPEC would end up becoming a burden on China and have a great negative impact,' it said, of President Xi Jinping's pet One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative.
The most surprising aspect of the draft masterplan is its revelation of the wide ambit of conceived projects. Previously, CPEC was thought to be limited to power and infrastructure projects in Pakistan. The $46 billion cited estimate of the total initiative envisages $11 billion investment in highways and transport networks, and $35 billion in coal and hydropower plants aimed at tackling Pakistan's energy deficit.
The draft plan, however, reveals that CPEC will eventually be far more sweeping than power plants and roads: it envisages a complete takeover of almost every aspect of the Pakistani economy. Agriculture, surprisingly, is the focus. Around 6,500 acres will be leased to China for agricultural demonstration projects, the masterplan draft says. It lists 17 projects, including a fertiliser plant with an annual 800,000 tonne output. Vegetable and grain processing plants with a 1 million tonne capacity have also been planned.
Power projects that will cut Pakistan's soaring energy deficit are also central to the plan. China has announced 17 projects with a total investment of $35 billion. The first of these, a coal-powered plant at Sahiwal in the Punjab, went online in May. Pakistan suffers an energy deficit of around 7 GW, with a capacity of 22 GW that, however, only produces around 12 GW a year. The total energy from China's projects, once they go online in the next few years, is an estimated 12.1 GW, which China says will end up bridging Pakistan's energy gap and ultimately contribute between 40 and 50 per cent of the country's energy needs. In addition to this, the Chinese are planning to overhaul Pakistan's road and rail infrastructure. Apart from upgrading the Karakoram highway that will serve as a key arterial link connecting Xinjiang and Gwadar, it is already being used to ship goods transported from Xinjiang by road, by sea to West Asia-China is also revamping the country's crumbling national highway and railway network, starting with upgrading sections of the Karachi-Peshawar road and rail line.
The under-construction Orange Line metro at Lahore
Trucks carrying goods during the opening of the Kashgar-Gwadar trade route
THE XINJIANG MODEL
Essentially, the 'Xinjiang model' will be adopted in Pakistan. In the 1950s, Mao set up the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC), a state within a state tasked with carrying out agriculture and development projects in what was then China's wild west. The CPEC plan even conceives of a role for the XPCC. 'We will impart advanced planting and breeding techniques to peasant households or farmers by means of land acquisition by the government, renting to China-invested enterprises and building planting and breeding bases,' it says.
'China-invested enterprises will establish factories to produce fertilisers, pesticides, vaccines and feedstuffs' while 'China-invested enterprises will, in the form of joint ventures, shareholding or acquisition, cooperate with local enterprises of Pakistan to build a three-level warehousing system (purchase and storage warehouse, transit warehouse and port warehouse)'. China will even construct a national storage network of warehouses for Pakistan, starting in Islamabad and Gwadar and then in Karachi, Lahore and Peshawar.
The draft also outlines a move to transport China's waning textile industry, currently grappling with rising wages, to Pakistan. As a start, a cotton processing plant with a 100,000 tonne output has been planned. The longer-term plan, Renmin University's assessment suggests, is 'shifting China's garment industries directly to Pakistan'. Beyond the lower wages and availability of land, China sees the favourable export tariffs Pakistan enjoys as a motivation.
'With Pakistan in 2015 acquiring duty-free access to the EU even as China's tariffs increased from 9 to 12 per cent, this is worth considering,' the study advises. China is also planning to develop Pakistan's mineral resources, particularly in Balochistan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, eyeing gold reserves as well as setting up marble and granite processing sites.
HEART OF THE PLAN
Gwadar, a dusty town of less than a hundred thousand people that sits on the Arabian Sea in Balochistan, is the CPEC hub. China has already built a port here that it is managing. Beyond the port, which will give China access to the Indian Ocean, it envisages a free trade zone and manufacturing hub that could serve as a launch pad for exports to West Asia and Africa. China has already secured a 23-year tax-free deal for its companies that will operate out of Gwadar.
The CPEC masterplan rather ambitiously even envisages a coastal tourism belt in restive Balochistan, planning 'international cruise clubs' in Gwadar that would 'provide marine tourists private rooms that would feel as though they were "living in the ocean''.' A coastal tourism zone will feature 'yacht wharfs, cruise homeports, nightlife, city parks, public squares, theatres, golf courses and spas, hot spring hotels and water sports', the Dawn report noted, running all the way to the Iran border.
China sees the Gwadar port as the heart of the plan. The Renmin University study forecasts an ambitious annual cargo throughput of 300-400 million tonnes, more than 10 times Pakistan's current biggest port, Karachi, and, the study pointedly adds, almost equivalent to India's total current throughput. The university's researchers found that Gwadar, still nowhere close to capacity, had been transformed under Chinese management. In February 2013, the China Overseas Port Holdings Limited acquired the rights to operate the port from the Singapore Port Authority, which left the port in a state of ruin, 'filled with rubbish and garbage', until the Chinese took over. Since then, a first shipping route was opened by the Chinese state-run Shipping Ocean Company (COSCO) in May 2015 exporting local seafood to Dubai. In November, the first CPEC export was flagged, as a convoy carrying 60 containers of a range of Chinese goods, from machinery to appliances, to be exported to West Asia and Africa, arrived in Gwadar after travelling 3,000 kilometres from Xinjiang along the Karakoram highway.
SECURITY FEARS
China is certainly more than aware that a lot can go wrong with this ambitious economic blueprint in one of the world's most volatile regions. A significant portion of the Renmin University assessment was devoted to assessing risks, the biggest of which, in the Chinese view, is Pakistan's unpredictable domestic political environment. For instance, it cited a project in Sindh that faced a lack of support from the local government. 'The project is ratified by the federal government but the Sindh government believes the centre does not have the authority,' it said. The report also noted the heated controversy between states over the CPEC's alignment, with widespread resentment that Punjab, where Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his brother Shahbaz, the chief minister, are dominant figures, was acquiring prime projects.
The Chinese study warned of 'ethnic and provincial conflicts in Punjab, Sindh and Balochistan', but was optimistic that most provinces and parties were supportive as 'except Balochistan no other ethnic group party opposes CPEC'. The report concluded that a government under Nawaz Sharif would ensure the project's progress, expressing concern about his weakening domestic position after the Panama Papers revelations. 'If there are no exceptions, the chances for PML-N (Sharif's party) to reassume power are high, and the continuation of the government can guarantee the continuation and support of the government to CPEC,' the report said.
Security is the other major concern, highlighted by the kidnapping and reported killing of two young Chinese from Quetta, Balochistan, in May. The Chinese study cited a number of other incidents that had targeted its citizens in 2016. In May, a Chinese engineer at the Kazmu project was targeted by a bomb attack claimed by an outfit called the Sindh Revolutionary Force. Two months later, a bomb attack in Quetta killed 74 people, while in November last year, a team from a Chinese oil and natural gas exploration company was targeted in an attack by a group called the Baloch Revolutionary Army in which two Pakistani security personnel killed.
The Pakistan army has deployed a special security division of 15,000 troops to protect Chinese personnel and assets, but the report argued that 'a troop size of 15,000 can hardly guarantee the safety of projects around the country.... And considering that Pakistan needs to deploy a large number of troops in its eastern borders adjoining India and now needs to deploy troops in Afghan border, allocating 15,000 is the largest capacity.' The wider concern was because of security, Chinese staff in Gwadar, for instance, will have to be 'cloistered within the Chinese zone as the situation around the city is not stable'. The Chinese report worried this will alienate the local population because 'Chinese personnel are carrying out work under the protection of armed forces and this inhibits improving relations with local people to the extent that it could lead to opposition and lack of people's support'.
Chalay Thay Saath, the first Pak-China romantic story
FINANCIAL RISKS
Then there are the financial hazards. China's exposure, so far, is much less than the advertised $46 billion figure, with estimates that in the past three years, its total investments would be in the $5 billion range, spent largely on coal power projects that are being built, the widening of the Karakoram highway and sections of the Karachi-Peshawar expressway.
Chinese assessments suggest the $46 billion figure that Pakistani officials regularly cite may not materialise for a long time yet. The CPEC draft masterplan from China's planning agency noted, as the Dawn reported, that 'Pakistan's economy cannot absorb FDI much above $2 billion per year without giving rise to stresses in its economy....It is recommended that China's maximum annual direct investment in Pakistan should be around $1 billion'-a damning reality check to fanciful figures of $50 billion being invested in the country.
For some in Pakistan, the long-term fear is that this blueprint will, as economist Zaidi notes, render it a 'vassal state' deep in China's economic orbit. After one year of the project, bilateral trade was up 15 per cent to $13.77 billion in 2015-16, while Pakistan's trade deficit with China was a whopping $12 billion. There are already murmurs of discontent about the favourable terms for Chinese companies.
"Estimates range from Pakistan having to pay $3 to $3.5 billion annually back to China for the next 30 years for Chinese loans after 2020, to a probable severe balance of payments crisis," argues Zaidi, noting how in Sri Lanka and Tajikistan, "with rising costs and debts incurred by the host countries, large chunks of land were handed over to the Chinese in lieu of unpaid funds. Sovereign guarantees to Chinese power producers have been made, where the Pakistan government will, 'if the power purchaser defaults on payments, pick up the liability and pay 22 per cent of the bills of Chinese power producers upfront'". As he puts it, "CPEC is a Chinese project, for Chinese interests." And Pakistan, he says, just happens to be part of the geographical terrain.
IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIA
What does it mean for India? On May 13 this year, India refused to participate in China's Belt and Road with a strongly-worded statement. "No country can accept a project that ignores its core concerns on sovereignty and territorial integrity," MEA spokesperson Gopal Baglay said. OBOR passing through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir is the primary reason New Delhi boycotted the project. For long, India has held the Kashmir issue as a bilateral dispute with Pakistan, with no room for outside intervention. China has now willy-nilly become a party to it. "Since CPEC was announced, Pakistan has stepped up its activities inside Kashmir. Funding to separatist elements has increased," says Jayadeva Ranade, former additional secretary in the Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW). The presence of Chinese personnel within Pakistan is something India must take into account in the event of hostilities, he says.
For instance, China and Pakistan have begun joint patrols in PoK near the Xinjiang border, Chinese media reports have said. Even as China now lambasts India as a "third party" with a "hidden agenda" for "intervening" in its dispute on the Doklam plateau with Bhutan, Beijing has quietly deployed its frontier troops on the soil of PoK, which India considers its territory. In the event of an Indo-Pak conflict, Indian officials do not expect China to intervene directly, but the infrastructure it is laying down in PoK can be used to back Pakistan with massive logistics support.
The larger concern is that collusion between the two countries is now assuming sinister dimensions. Gwadar is likely to become China's second overseas naval base after Djibouti near the Gulf of Aden. The port also sits astride the sea routes from where more than 55 per cent of India's energy needs flow in. China's clandestine backing of Pakistan goes back decades starting from the alleged transfer of nuclear weapon blueprints in the early 1980s. The 2016 sale of eight Yuan class submarines to Pakistan not only attempts to checkmate the Indian navy in its backyard, but adds another nuclear dimension. Pakistan is now working to equip them with nuclear-tipped variants of the Chinese 'Babur' land attack cruise missiles.
Then there is the diplomatic protection China offers Pakistan, which some in Delhi believe is emboldening Islamabad to hurt Indian interests. In the past, Beijing had largely kept away from issues such as the Kashmir dispute. That caution is now giving way to what some see as an open backing of Pakistan. This was evident in Beijing issuing stapled visas to Indian residents of Jammu & Kashmir-which subsequently ended after India stopped defence exchanges-even while it opened the door to Pakistani residents from Gilgit-Baltistan to freely cross the border into Xinjiang to open up trading offices in Kashgar, where ironically India had a consulate and trading presence until 1950.
This renewed China-Pakistan nexus has once again begun to cast a shadow on India's relations with China. In two issues that have recently strained relations-China's blocking of India's attempts to sanction the Pakistani terrorist Masood Azhar at the United Nations Security Council 1267 sanctions committee and India's failed entry to the Nuclear Suppliers Group-the Pakistan factor has loomed large in China's calculus. Beijing in 2016 stymied the bid to sanction Azhar, and once again in January placed another 'technical hold' on a fresh application backed by the US, UK and France. On the NSG, Beijing's officials have openly said that "other non-NPT countries" (those that have not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty) besides India also had legitimate aspirations to join the grouping, referring to Pakistan. Chinese nuclear negotiators pointedly visited Islamabad after talks in Delhi to underline how Beijing is linking India and Pakistan, despite the impeccable non-proliferation record of the former and the questionable track record of the latter. As Beijing further deepens its economic and strategic embrace with its 'iron brother', its relations with India are set to undergo a transformative shift. And for Delhi, confronting this renewed China-Pakistan nexus has become perhaps the most pressing diplomatic and military challenge.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...mplication-for-india-cpec-obor/1/1006432.html
When Mao Zedong's People's Liberation Army marched into the restive Muslim-majority region on China's western frontier in 1949, the Chairman decided to christen the People's Republic's newest province Xinjiang, literally meaning 'new frontier'- a historical name used intermittently for China's borderlands. Today, for many in Beijing, Pakistan is China's new new frontier. If the 20-year blueprint envisioned by China's leaders and Pakistan's current government comes to fruition, Beijing will soon have a say in how almost every aspect of the Pakistani economy is run.
In the three years since the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project was launched, this transformation has already begun to unfold. A draft CPEC masterplan, conceived of by China's National Development and Reform Commission and Pakistan's ministry of planning and published by Pakistan's Dawn newspaper, and the most sweeping Chinese assessment till date about the project- an internal review undertaken by Beijing's Renmin University and shared with India Today- both underline the enormous scale of the planned economic takeover, from roads and power plants to even agricultural projects.
PAKISTAN'S NEW OLD FRIEND
Today, Chinese companies are building and managing the country's key transport networks, from national highways to Lahore's metro rail. China has bought a stake in Pakistan's stock exchange. It is building Pakistan's power sector, coal plant by coal plant, and will eventually, many experts believe, have a say in how much Pakistani citizens pay their government for electricity.
Ties between China and Pakistan go back to the early 1960s, a relationship forged in their mutual animosity towards India in the wake of their respective wars. Since then, both governments, and particularly militaries, have developed close relations. China has supported Pakistan as a counterweight to India in South Asia, most notably through its continuing support of the country's nuclear programme. China, however, fell out of prominence in the wake of America's 'war on terror' after the September 11, 2001 attacks. This also coincided with Beijing more carefully balancing its growing relations with India after the 1988 normalisation of ties. In the years following 9/11, the US began leaning heavily on Pakistan for its war in Afghanistan, emerging as the biggest financial donor.
That is now no longer the case. China has now replaced the US as Pakistan's biggest benefactor. The launch of CPEC has only further reinforced this position: China's trade with Pakistan has already risen threefold in the past few years, to $13.7 billion in 2015-16, up from just $4 billion in 2007. Today, China accounts for 40 per cent of Pakistan's foreign direct investment, which is only around $2 billion. According to the Pakistani government, it was China's $600 million that contributed to a 38 per cent rise in FDI in 2015-'16.
Graphics by TANMOY CHAKRABORTY
THE TAKEOVER BLUEPRINT
CPEC will usher in an even more sweeping takeover of the Pakistani economy. A draft masterplan says thousands of acres of Pakistani land will be transferred to Chinese companies to grow crops, build meat processing plants and develop free trade zones. Chinese garment factories will, en masse, be transferred to Pakistan, while China will manage and run tourism projects and special economic zones along the southern coast, with rather ambitious plans for even yacht clubs and hot spring hotels to develop an unlikely tourism hub in the restive Balochistan province, of all places.
"There are fears that Pakistan will become just another province of China, or will be reduced to being a 'vassal state'," S. Akbar Zaidi, a leading Pakistani political economist and professor at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs, has argued in a paper.
For Beijing, the stakes are high. The internal assessment by Renmin University's Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, which sent scholars to visit Pakistan and study CPEC projects late last year, warned of numerous risks, from political infighting in Pakistan to terrorism. The report, however, came to the final conclusion that the only way for China to guarantee success is to assume even more sweeping control.
'Neither China nor Pakistan can afford the consequences of the failure of constructing the corridor,' the Chinese report concluded. 'If the current uncertainty was to continue, it would not only delay the opening of the flagship project but CPEC would end up becoming a burden on China and have a great negative impact,' it said, of President Xi Jinping's pet One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative.
The most surprising aspect of the draft masterplan is its revelation of the wide ambit of conceived projects. Previously, CPEC was thought to be limited to power and infrastructure projects in Pakistan. The $46 billion cited estimate of the total initiative envisages $11 billion investment in highways and transport networks, and $35 billion in coal and hydropower plants aimed at tackling Pakistan's energy deficit.
The draft plan, however, reveals that CPEC will eventually be far more sweeping than power plants and roads: it envisages a complete takeover of almost every aspect of the Pakistani economy. Agriculture, surprisingly, is the focus. Around 6,500 acres will be leased to China for agricultural demonstration projects, the masterplan draft says. It lists 17 projects, including a fertiliser plant with an annual 800,000 tonne output. Vegetable and grain processing plants with a 1 million tonne capacity have also been planned.
Power projects that will cut Pakistan's soaring energy deficit are also central to the plan. China has announced 17 projects with a total investment of $35 billion. The first of these, a coal-powered plant at Sahiwal in the Punjab, went online in May. Pakistan suffers an energy deficit of around 7 GW, with a capacity of 22 GW that, however, only produces around 12 GW a year. The total energy from China's projects, once they go online in the next few years, is an estimated 12.1 GW, which China says will end up bridging Pakistan's energy gap and ultimately contribute between 40 and 50 per cent of the country's energy needs. In addition to this, the Chinese are planning to overhaul Pakistan's road and rail infrastructure. Apart from upgrading the Karakoram highway that will serve as a key arterial link connecting Xinjiang and Gwadar, it is already being used to ship goods transported from Xinjiang by road, by sea to West Asia-China is also revamping the country's crumbling national highway and railway network, starting with upgrading sections of the Karachi-Peshawar road and rail line.
The under-construction Orange Line metro at Lahore
Trucks carrying goods during the opening of the Kashgar-Gwadar trade route
THE XINJIANG MODEL
Essentially, the 'Xinjiang model' will be adopted in Pakistan. In the 1950s, Mao set up the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC), a state within a state tasked with carrying out agriculture and development projects in what was then China's wild west. The CPEC plan even conceives of a role for the XPCC. 'We will impart advanced planting and breeding techniques to peasant households or farmers by means of land acquisition by the government, renting to China-invested enterprises and building planting and breeding bases,' it says.
'China-invested enterprises will establish factories to produce fertilisers, pesticides, vaccines and feedstuffs' while 'China-invested enterprises will, in the form of joint ventures, shareholding or acquisition, cooperate with local enterprises of Pakistan to build a three-level warehousing system (purchase and storage warehouse, transit warehouse and port warehouse)'. China will even construct a national storage network of warehouses for Pakistan, starting in Islamabad and Gwadar and then in Karachi, Lahore and Peshawar.
The draft also outlines a move to transport China's waning textile industry, currently grappling with rising wages, to Pakistan. As a start, a cotton processing plant with a 100,000 tonne output has been planned. The longer-term plan, Renmin University's assessment suggests, is 'shifting China's garment industries directly to Pakistan'. Beyond the lower wages and availability of land, China sees the favourable export tariffs Pakistan enjoys as a motivation.
'With Pakistan in 2015 acquiring duty-free access to the EU even as China's tariffs increased from 9 to 12 per cent, this is worth considering,' the study advises. China is also planning to develop Pakistan's mineral resources, particularly in Balochistan and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, eyeing gold reserves as well as setting up marble and granite processing sites.
HEART OF THE PLAN
Gwadar, a dusty town of less than a hundred thousand people that sits on the Arabian Sea in Balochistan, is the CPEC hub. China has already built a port here that it is managing. Beyond the port, which will give China access to the Indian Ocean, it envisages a free trade zone and manufacturing hub that could serve as a launch pad for exports to West Asia and Africa. China has already secured a 23-year tax-free deal for its companies that will operate out of Gwadar.
The CPEC masterplan rather ambitiously even envisages a coastal tourism belt in restive Balochistan, planning 'international cruise clubs' in Gwadar that would 'provide marine tourists private rooms that would feel as though they were "living in the ocean''.' A coastal tourism zone will feature 'yacht wharfs, cruise homeports, nightlife, city parks, public squares, theatres, golf courses and spas, hot spring hotels and water sports', the Dawn report noted, running all the way to the Iran border.
China sees the Gwadar port as the heart of the plan. The Renmin University study forecasts an ambitious annual cargo throughput of 300-400 million tonnes, more than 10 times Pakistan's current biggest port, Karachi, and, the study pointedly adds, almost equivalent to India's total current throughput. The university's researchers found that Gwadar, still nowhere close to capacity, had been transformed under Chinese management. In February 2013, the China Overseas Port Holdings Limited acquired the rights to operate the port from the Singapore Port Authority, which left the port in a state of ruin, 'filled with rubbish and garbage', until the Chinese took over. Since then, a first shipping route was opened by the Chinese state-run Shipping Ocean Company (COSCO) in May 2015 exporting local seafood to Dubai. In November, the first CPEC export was flagged, as a convoy carrying 60 containers of a range of Chinese goods, from machinery to appliances, to be exported to West Asia and Africa, arrived in Gwadar after travelling 3,000 kilometres from Xinjiang along the Karakoram highway.
SECURITY FEARS
China is certainly more than aware that a lot can go wrong with this ambitious economic blueprint in one of the world's most volatile regions. A significant portion of the Renmin University assessment was devoted to assessing risks, the biggest of which, in the Chinese view, is Pakistan's unpredictable domestic political environment. For instance, it cited a project in Sindh that faced a lack of support from the local government. 'The project is ratified by the federal government but the Sindh government believes the centre does not have the authority,' it said. The report also noted the heated controversy between states over the CPEC's alignment, with widespread resentment that Punjab, where Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his brother Shahbaz, the chief minister, are dominant figures, was acquiring prime projects.
The Chinese study warned of 'ethnic and provincial conflicts in Punjab, Sindh and Balochistan', but was optimistic that most provinces and parties were supportive as 'except Balochistan no other ethnic group party opposes CPEC'. The report concluded that a government under Nawaz Sharif would ensure the project's progress, expressing concern about his weakening domestic position after the Panama Papers revelations. 'If there are no exceptions, the chances for PML-N (Sharif's party) to reassume power are high, and the continuation of the government can guarantee the continuation and support of the government to CPEC,' the report said.
Security is the other major concern, highlighted by the kidnapping and reported killing of two young Chinese from Quetta, Balochistan, in May. The Chinese study cited a number of other incidents that had targeted its citizens in 2016. In May, a Chinese engineer at the Kazmu project was targeted by a bomb attack claimed by an outfit called the Sindh Revolutionary Force. Two months later, a bomb attack in Quetta killed 74 people, while in November last year, a team from a Chinese oil and natural gas exploration company was targeted in an attack by a group called the Baloch Revolutionary Army in which two Pakistani security personnel killed.
The Pakistan army has deployed a special security division of 15,000 troops to protect Chinese personnel and assets, but the report argued that 'a troop size of 15,000 can hardly guarantee the safety of projects around the country.... And considering that Pakistan needs to deploy a large number of troops in its eastern borders adjoining India and now needs to deploy troops in Afghan border, allocating 15,000 is the largest capacity.' The wider concern was because of security, Chinese staff in Gwadar, for instance, will have to be 'cloistered within the Chinese zone as the situation around the city is not stable'. The Chinese report worried this will alienate the local population because 'Chinese personnel are carrying out work under the protection of armed forces and this inhibits improving relations with local people to the extent that it could lead to opposition and lack of people's support'.
Chalay Thay Saath, the first Pak-China romantic story
FINANCIAL RISKS
Then there are the financial hazards. China's exposure, so far, is much less than the advertised $46 billion figure, with estimates that in the past three years, its total investments would be in the $5 billion range, spent largely on coal power projects that are being built, the widening of the Karakoram highway and sections of the Karachi-Peshawar expressway.
Chinese assessments suggest the $46 billion figure that Pakistani officials regularly cite may not materialise for a long time yet. The CPEC draft masterplan from China's planning agency noted, as the Dawn reported, that 'Pakistan's economy cannot absorb FDI much above $2 billion per year without giving rise to stresses in its economy....It is recommended that China's maximum annual direct investment in Pakistan should be around $1 billion'-a damning reality check to fanciful figures of $50 billion being invested in the country.
For some in Pakistan, the long-term fear is that this blueprint will, as economist Zaidi notes, render it a 'vassal state' deep in China's economic orbit. After one year of the project, bilateral trade was up 15 per cent to $13.77 billion in 2015-16, while Pakistan's trade deficit with China was a whopping $12 billion. There are already murmurs of discontent about the favourable terms for Chinese companies.
"Estimates range from Pakistan having to pay $3 to $3.5 billion annually back to China for the next 30 years for Chinese loans after 2020, to a probable severe balance of payments crisis," argues Zaidi, noting how in Sri Lanka and Tajikistan, "with rising costs and debts incurred by the host countries, large chunks of land were handed over to the Chinese in lieu of unpaid funds. Sovereign guarantees to Chinese power producers have been made, where the Pakistan government will, 'if the power purchaser defaults on payments, pick up the liability and pay 22 per cent of the bills of Chinese power producers upfront'". As he puts it, "CPEC is a Chinese project, for Chinese interests." And Pakistan, he says, just happens to be part of the geographical terrain.
IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIA
What does it mean for India? On May 13 this year, India refused to participate in China's Belt and Road with a strongly-worded statement. "No country can accept a project that ignores its core concerns on sovereignty and territorial integrity," MEA spokesperson Gopal Baglay said. OBOR passing through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir is the primary reason New Delhi boycotted the project. For long, India has held the Kashmir issue as a bilateral dispute with Pakistan, with no room for outside intervention. China has now willy-nilly become a party to it. "Since CPEC was announced, Pakistan has stepped up its activities inside Kashmir. Funding to separatist elements has increased," says Jayadeva Ranade, former additional secretary in the Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW). The presence of Chinese personnel within Pakistan is something India must take into account in the event of hostilities, he says.
For instance, China and Pakistan have begun joint patrols in PoK near the Xinjiang border, Chinese media reports have said. Even as China now lambasts India as a "third party" with a "hidden agenda" for "intervening" in its dispute on the Doklam plateau with Bhutan, Beijing has quietly deployed its frontier troops on the soil of PoK, which India considers its territory. In the event of an Indo-Pak conflict, Indian officials do not expect China to intervene directly, but the infrastructure it is laying down in PoK can be used to back Pakistan with massive logistics support.
The larger concern is that collusion between the two countries is now assuming sinister dimensions. Gwadar is likely to become China's second overseas naval base after Djibouti near the Gulf of Aden. The port also sits astride the sea routes from where more than 55 per cent of India's energy needs flow in. China's clandestine backing of Pakistan goes back decades starting from the alleged transfer of nuclear weapon blueprints in the early 1980s. The 2016 sale of eight Yuan class submarines to Pakistan not only attempts to checkmate the Indian navy in its backyard, but adds another nuclear dimension. Pakistan is now working to equip them with nuclear-tipped variants of the Chinese 'Babur' land attack cruise missiles.
Then there is the diplomatic protection China offers Pakistan, which some in Delhi believe is emboldening Islamabad to hurt Indian interests. In the past, Beijing had largely kept away from issues such as the Kashmir dispute. That caution is now giving way to what some see as an open backing of Pakistan. This was evident in Beijing issuing stapled visas to Indian residents of Jammu & Kashmir-which subsequently ended after India stopped defence exchanges-even while it opened the door to Pakistani residents from Gilgit-Baltistan to freely cross the border into Xinjiang to open up trading offices in Kashgar, where ironically India had a consulate and trading presence until 1950.
This renewed China-Pakistan nexus has once again begun to cast a shadow on India's relations with China. In two issues that have recently strained relations-China's blocking of India's attempts to sanction the Pakistani terrorist Masood Azhar at the United Nations Security Council 1267 sanctions committee and India's failed entry to the Nuclear Suppliers Group-the Pakistan factor has loomed large in China's calculus. Beijing in 2016 stymied the bid to sanction Azhar, and once again in January placed another 'technical hold' on a fresh application backed by the US, UK and France. On the NSG, Beijing's officials have openly said that "other non-NPT countries" (those that have not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty) besides India also had legitimate aspirations to join the grouping, referring to Pakistan. Chinese nuclear negotiators pointedly visited Islamabad after talks in Delhi to underline how Beijing is linking India and Pakistan, despite the impeccable non-proliferation record of the former and the questionable track record of the latter. As Beijing further deepens its economic and strategic embrace with its 'iron brother', its relations with India are set to undergo a transformative shift. And for Delhi, confronting this renewed China-Pakistan nexus has become perhaps the most pressing diplomatic and military challenge.
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...mplication-for-india-cpec-obor/1/1006432.html
Mikesingh
Professional
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2015
- Messages
- 7,353
- Likes
- 30,450
That's gonna change as China takes over Pak gradually and makes it its 6th province. It's just a matter of time!
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2017
- Messages
- 1,235
- Likes
- 2,717
Please compare the schools (not madarsa), hospital , space research, manufacturing Capability etc
And most when I engage in discussion with any of the PAKISTAN's citizen than they always defend by number of toilets than please read the below article (if you Also think to defend yourself with that)
https://www.dawn.com/news/1168630
Anyways, Good Day
Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using Tapatalk
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2017
- Messages
- 1,235
- Likes
- 2,717
LordOfTheUnderworlds
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
- Messages
- 1,299
- Likes
- 1,379
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=90008
.......................................
That is not a lot of targets for nukes.
.......................................
That is not a lot of targets for nukes.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2017
- Messages
- 1,235
- Likes
- 2,717
LOL,
for pakistan its quite a headache to decide.
but why CHINA is celebrating BLACK DAY
LordOfTheUnderworlds
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
- Messages
- 1,299
- Likes
- 1,379
China is quite alright if you zoom in and consider the fact that most of its population lives near eastern coast (that also means vulnerable targets are limited to few urban regions). But considering Pakistan has same population as that of Uttar Pradesh and double the GDP it should have been much brighter I guess.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2017
- Messages
- 1,235
- Likes
- 2,717
China have 1.4 billion population and all of them are staying at eastern coast, good.
and for pakistan, its even less brighter than UP except PoK.
LordOfTheUnderworlds
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
- Messages
- 1,299
- Likes
- 1,379
Its not POK I think. Its Islamabad/Rawalpindi urban cluster (very close to POK) with a highway going to Peshawar and another highway going down to Lahore with couple of other bright spots in Punjab. Then directly down south two bright spots of Urdu speaking mohajir dominated cities of Karachi and Hyderabad.
IndianHawk
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 9,058
- Likes
- 37,672
The economic output of pakistan comes mostly from karchi and islambad clusters rest is all backward goat lands .
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 31,932
- Likes
- 148,140
In Pakistan lights are brighter along their rivers. Their fertile lands are along rivers hence development is along rivers, same as us. More than 60% of their population lives along the river.
IndianHawk
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2016
- Messages
- 9,058
- Likes
- 37,672
Yup but now consider another scenario where India has sufficient numbers of A5 A6 to deliver hundreds of nukes to eastern china . This will make nuclear war forbidden for chinese.
But since chinese have so less infrastructure and population in Tibet , Indian long range cruise missiles and medium range ballistic missiles if deployed in thousands can take out whatever road rail , bridge connect china to Tibet and xinxiang.
Once these links between china and Tibet are cut off all Chinese can do is to throw long range missiles at India from mainland but such missiles will be in short number and won't be able to harm India much.
So if can deploy thousands of 1000-2000 km range missiles over Tibet we literally have china by the balls.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2017
- Messages
- 1,235
- Likes
- 2,717
OK, even if I believe u, than also you can compare it with India.
comparable how backward is pak even after 70 years of Independence.
Cheers!!!
Kshatriya87
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2014
- Messages
- 10,136
- Likes
- 16,039
Uncertainty continues to hamper investors sentiments at PSX
LAHORE - Last week witnessed a slight upward correction at the local bourse following a selling rampage over the last few weeks as value buyers jumped in to take positions ahead of the corporate results season, though most investors still remain sidelined from the market amidst political uncertainty. The benchmark KSE 100-index closed 2.2 percent higher with average daily volumes and value declining by 23 percent (to 134m shares/day) and 22 percent (to $72m/day), respectively. Amongst the key sectors, oil & gas exploration (+5 percent), autos (+5 percent) and OMCs (+4 percent) were top gainers, whereas textile weaving (-5 percent WoW), power generation (-1 percent WoW) and chemicals (-1 percent WoW) lagged behind.
LAHORE - Last week witnessed a slight upward correction at the local bourse following a selling rampage over the last few weeks as value buyers jumped in to take positions ahead of the corporate results season, though most investors still remain sidelined from the market amidst political uncertainty. The benchmark KSE 100-index closed 2.2 percent higher with average daily volumes and value declining by 23 percent (to 134m shares/day) and 22 percent (to $72m/day), respectively. Amongst the key sectors, oil & gas exploration (+5 percent), autos (+5 percent) and OMCs (+4 percent) were top gainers, whereas textile weaving (-5 percent WoW), power generation (-1 percent WoW) and chemicals (-1 percent WoW) lagged behind.
Kshatriya87
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2014
- Messages
- 10,136
- Likes
- 16,039
Pakistan may face economic instability sans reforms: IMF
ISLAMABAD
Pakistan’s macroeconomic stability earned in the past three years could be undermined if the country fails to continue with its reforms, the IMF has warned, amid the political tension over the sensitive Panama Papers case.
Resident Representative of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to Pakistan Tokhir Mirzoev said the economic stability needed to be used to make the gains achieved through it more permanent.
Mirzoev cautioned that the present trends could undermine macroeconomic stability “if the reforms do not continue”.
The warning came amidst looming political instability in the run up to a verdict in the high-profile Panama Papers case against beleaguered Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his family for alleged corruption and money laundering.
The Supreme Court on Saturday reserved its judgement in the case after concluding the hearings. It is not clear if the verdict would unleash chaos in the country.
The Panama Papers last year revealed that Sharif sons and daughter owned offshore companies which managed their family’s properties. The assets in question include four expensive flats in Park Lane, London.
“The moment of opportunity earned through the stabilisation programme is a hard-earned opportunity to advance deeper structural transformation of the economy to ensure future stability,” Mirzoev told the Dawn newspaper.
He said the key trends were widening of the current account deficit and a still vulnerable fiscal framework.
Pakistani economy has made progress in the last three years. The IMF has projected that Pakistan’s economy will continue to grow at a healthy pace in 2017 and 2018.
The IMF had raised its GDP growth forecast for Pakistan for FY 2017 from 4.7 to 5 per cent and projected GDP growth of 5.5 per cent.
Noting that the budgeted revenue would require a “significant effort”, Mirzoev said the decline in reserves and the growing current account deficit were sources of concern.
“Currently the economy is flying on one engine and that engine is importing sectors, while the second engine — exports — is lagging,” he said.
Mirzoev said that the greater exchange rate flexibility will help rectify this imbalance, but beyond that, the government will need to engage with the exporter community more proactively to develop the plans to revive exports.
“Adding more generation capacity to the system is crucial, but more generation without reforming a leaky distribution system could add to the circular debt and may compromise long-term sustainability of new energy projects. In this context, finding a permanent solution to power sector arrears will be critical in the period ahead,” Mirzoev said when asked about the nature of the reforms to be undertaken.
Mirzoev is currently on rounds meeting with business and opinion leaders around the country following the latest Article IV report released by the fund this week.
ISLAMABAD
Pakistan’s macroeconomic stability earned in the past three years could be undermined if the country fails to continue with its reforms, the IMF has warned, amid the political tension over the sensitive Panama Papers case.
Resident Representative of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to Pakistan Tokhir Mirzoev said the economic stability needed to be used to make the gains achieved through it more permanent.
Mirzoev cautioned that the present trends could undermine macroeconomic stability “if the reforms do not continue”.
The warning came amidst looming political instability in the run up to a verdict in the high-profile Panama Papers case against beleaguered Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his family for alleged corruption and money laundering.
The Supreme Court on Saturday reserved its judgement in the case after concluding the hearings. It is not clear if the verdict would unleash chaos in the country.
The Panama Papers last year revealed that Sharif sons and daughter owned offshore companies which managed their family’s properties. The assets in question include four expensive flats in Park Lane, London.
“The moment of opportunity earned through the stabilisation programme is a hard-earned opportunity to advance deeper structural transformation of the economy to ensure future stability,” Mirzoev told the Dawn newspaper.
He said the key trends were widening of the current account deficit and a still vulnerable fiscal framework.
Pakistani economy has made progress in the last three years. The IMF has projected that Pakistan’s economy will continue to grow at a healthy pace in 2017 and 2018.
The IMF had raised its GDP growth forecast for Pakistan for FY 2017 from 4.7 to 5 per cent and projected GDP growth of 5.5 per cent.
Noting that the budgeted revenue would require a “significant effort”, Mirzoev said the decline in reserves and the growing current account deficit were sources of concern.
“Currently the economy is flying on one engine and that engine is importing sectors, while the second engine — exports — is lagging,” he said.
Mirzoev said that the greater exchange rate flexibility will help rectify this imbalance, but beyond that, the government will need to engage with the exporter community more proactively to develop the plans to revive exports.
“Adding more generation capacity to the system is crucial, but more generation without reforming a leaky distribution system could add to the circular debt and may compromise long-term sustainability of new energy projects. In this context, finding a permanent solution to power sector arrears will be critical in the period ahead,” Mirzoev said when asked about the nature of the reforms to be undertaken.
Mirzoev is currently on rounds meeting with business and opinion leaders around the country following the latest Article IV report released by the fund this week.
Kshatriya87
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2014
- Messages
- 10,136
- Likes
- 16,039
Public debt reaches Rs20.9tr in 3rd quarter
LAHORE - The gross public debt of the country has reached Rs20.9 trillion, with an addition of Rs1.2 trillion in third quarter (July-March) of FY17. More than 90 percent of the rise in public debt came from domestic borrowing, while increase in external debt remained moderate on account of revaluation gains and marginally higher debt repayments during the period.
This was stated in third quarterly report of ‘State of Pakistan Economy’ released by the central bank.
LAHORE - The gross public debt of the country has reached Rs20.9 trillion, with an addition of Rs1.2 trillion in third quarter (July-March) of FY17. More than 90 percent of the rise in public debt came from domestic borrowing, while increase in external debt remained moderate on account of revaluation gains and marginally higher debt repayments during the period.
This was stated in third quarterly report of ‘State of Pakistan Economy’ released by the central bank.
Kshatriya87
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2014
- Messages
- 10,136
- Likes
- 16,039
Data suggest Pakistan faces prospect of financial meltdown
High imports, driven by CPEC, combined with stagnant exports and a drop in foreign remittances, resulted in a record trade deficit and current account deficit in the fiscal year just ended
By F.M. SHAKIL JULY 24, 2017 6:17 PM (UTC+8)
Pakistan’s balance of payments position deteriorated significantly during the financial year ended June 30 as its current account deficit surged to an unprecedented US$12.1 billion due to a steep rise in imports and a drop in the foreign remittances. Exports also registered a downward trend.
Data from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) reveals that imports reached a historic level of US$53 billion, while the trade deficit was US$32.58 billion for the fiscal year 2016/2017.
Pakistan’s State Bank attributes the high volume of imports to projects connected with the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Heavy machinery, equipment, and materials have all been imported from China for construction purposes. Meanwhile, the government has offered feeble excuses for the stagnation in the country’s exports, namely that global market trends have been unfavorable. Stalled growth in the volume of world trade and low commodity prices have not been helpful, certainly, but the fact remains that Pakistan’s exports have been falling since 2013-14, well ahead of those downturns.
The government’s policy of import substitution has in fact left little room for export promotion and diversification. The Export Promotion Bureau (EPB) and other government departments under the Ministry of Commerce have been doing nothing to promote exports of non-traditional items. They are not facilitating exports at all but rather creating obstacles to the growth of the country’s export base.
The government has claimed that growing imports are a sign that economic activity is expanding. This simply does not hold water, however, in the face of Pakistan’s mounting external debts – which reached a whopping US$79 billion at the end of financial year.The Government has been on a borrowing binge and broke all previous records to acquired US$10.1 billion in foreign loans during fiscal 2016-17 alone. About 37%, or US$3.9 billion of that borrowing came from China – Islamabad’s new lifeline. This sum includes US$2.3 billion in commercial loans and another US$1.6 billion in bilateral economic assistance.
The poor export performance and trade deficit forced a currency devaluation of more than 3% on July 5. This has exerted inflationary pressure on consumers, with a 10% increase in the cost of goods and services in the country already being felt
With a view to paying off old debts and supporting its foreign exchange reserve position, the government resorted to short-term commercial loans of over US$4.3 billion, against a budgetary allocation of US$2 billion. These expensive short-term debts, taken on the prevailing market rates, included US$ 1.7 billion from the China Development Bank, US$300 million from the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, US$300 million from Bank of China, US$445 million from the UAE’s Noor Bank, US$650 million from a consortium of Suisse Bank, UBL and ABL, US$ 275 million from Citi Bank, and US$700 million from Standard Chartered.
The poor export performance and trade deficit forced a currency devaluation of more than 3% on July 5. This has exerted inflationary pressure on consumers, with a 10% increase in the cost of goods and services in the country already being felt.
Interestingly, the government has not owned the devaluation and has ordered a probe to determine the causes of the currency’s sudden depreciation. Finance Minister Ishaq Dar earlier put responsibility for the largest single drop in the rupee’s value at the feet of the State Bank’s acting governor, Riaz Riazuddin. The latter’s tenure has been cut short, with a new governor appointed on a three-year term.
Foreign remittances have shown a steady decline over the last couple of years. The data shows workers’ remittances fell 3.08% to US$19.3 billion during 2016-17, from US$19.9 billion for the year before. Remittances have financed Pakistan’s trade deficit for some time. If structural changes are not enacted to address current trends, Pakistan may well face an impending financial crisis.
High imports, driven by CPEC, combined with stagnant exports and a drop in foreign remittances, resulted in a record trade deficit and current account deficit in the fiscal year just ended
By F.M. SHAKIL JULY 24, 2017 6:17 PM (UTC+8)
Pakistan’s balance of payments position deteriorated significantly during the financial year ended June 30 as its current account deficit surged to an unprecedented US$12.1 billion due to a steep rise in imports and a drop in the foreign remittances. Exports also registered a downward trend.
Data from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) reveals that imports reached a historic level of US$53 billion, while the trade deficit was US$32.58 billion for the fiscal year 2016/2017.
Pakistan’s State Bank attributes the high volume of imports to projects connected with the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Heavy machinery, equipment, and materials have all been imported from China for construction purposes. Meanwhile, the government has offered feeble excuses for the stagnation in the country’s exports, namely that global market trends have been unfavorable. Stalled growth in the volume of world trade and low commodity prices have not been helpful, certainly, but the fact remains that Pakistan’s exports have been falling since 2013-14, well ahead of those downturns.
The government’s policy of import substitution has in fact left little room for export promotion and diversification. The Export Promotion Bureau (EPB) and other government departments under the Ministry of Commerce have been doing nothing to promote exports of non-traditional items. They are not facilitating exports at all but rather creating obstacles to the growth of the country’s export base.
The government has claimed that growing imports are a sign that economic activity is expanding. This simply does not hold water, however, in the face of Pakistan’s mounting external debts – which reached a whopping US$79 billion at the end of financial year.The Government has been on a borrowing binge and broke all previous records to acquired US$10.1 billion in foreign loans during fiscal 2016-17 alone. About 37%, or US$3.9 billion of that borrowing came from China – Islamabad’s new lifeline. This sum includes US$2.3 billion in commercial loans and another US$1.6 billion in bilateral economic assistance.
The poor export performance and trade deficit forced a currency devaluation of more than 3% on July 5. This has exerted inflationary pressure on consumers, with a 10% increase in the cost of goods and services in the country already being felt
With a view to paying off old debts and supporting its foreign exchange reserve position, the government resorted to short-term commercial loans of over US$4.3 billion, against a budgetary allocation of US$2 billion. These expensive short-term debts, taken on the prevailing market rates, included US$ 1.7 billion from the China Development Bank, US$300 million from the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, US$300 million from Bank of China, US$445 million from the UAE’s Noor Bank, US$650 million from a consortium of Suisse Bank, UBL and ABL, US$ 275 million from Citi Bank, and US$700 million from Standard Chartered.
The poor export performance and trade deficit forced a currency devaluation of more than 3% on July 5. This has exerted inflationary pressure on consumers, with a 10% increase in the cost of goods and services in the country already being felt.
Interestingly, the government has not owned the devaluation and has ordered a probe to determine the causes of the currency’s sudden depreciation. Finance Minister Ishaq Dar earlier put responsibility for the largest single drop in the rupee’s value at the feet of the State Bank’s acting governor, Riaz Riazuddin. The latter’s tenure has been cut short, with a new governor appointed on a three-year term.
Foreign remittances have shown a steady decline over the last couple of years. The data shows workers’ remittances fell 3.08% to US$19.3 billion during 2016-17, from US$19.9 billion for the year before. Remittances have financed Pakistan’s trade deficit for some time. If structural changes are not enacted to address current trends, Pakistan may well face an impending financial crisis.
Kshatriya87
Senior Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2014
- Messages
- 10,136
- Likes
- 16,039
| Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
India added 20% of Pakistan GDP in 2 days to her economy. | Economy & Infrastructure | 125 | |
|
Pakistan will be 16th largest economy by 2050: PWC report | Pakistan | 75 | |
| B | Pakistan's economy facing existential crisis: Report | Pakistan | 2 | |
|
Pakistan's economy better than India's: Bloomberg | Pakistan | 38 |
