johnee
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2009
- Messages
- 3,473
- Likes
- 499
Innocents can be categorised in 2 ways:@Tshering22
No Tshering. Innocents are innocents, whichever religion/country they belong to. These ppl just came for feeding their stomach when that biatch suicde bomber blew up killing them.
What you say might be true for the armed forces/ISI. But just because they are Pakistanis I cannot support the killing of innocents.
When I expect others to feel for the blasts in Varanasi, isnt it incumbent on me to do the same also ??
The situation is a result of the top echelons of power hungry,jihadi mindset in the ISI and Army. But dont blame the innocents for that.
ps.: Dont call me apologetic. You have seen my posts and you should know better.
1) Those who dont protest against injustice done on others by their own state/nation/group/community/...etc.
2) Those who protest against the injustices done on others by their own state/nation/group/community/...etc.
The first category are passively supporting the injustices and hence they are fair game if they become collateral. The second category are not only innocents but dharmic and they must be sympathised with.
To give you an example: Hanuman burnt the entire Lanka. All the magnificent buildings, towers, arches, gateways...etc, which were decorated with precious jewels and gems and coated with gold and silver, were caught on fire. The gold that was coated on the buildings of Lanka started melting and formed a river. The sounds of gems and jewels bursting in the flames were heard. People of Lanka were also engulfed in the blaze. The fire did not spare anything or anyone. The only exception was Vibhishana's palace and Sita's residence(Ashoka Vatika). Vibhishana had protested against Ravana's injustices. Sita was a victim. Other than these two, no one else in Lanka had raised their voice against Ravana. So, they all deserved their misery.
Another example: In the court of Dhritarashtra, the empress Draupadi was insulted before the very eyes of her husbands in the grand assembly which consisted of stalwarts like Bhishma, Drona, Kripa, Ashwattama...etc by the Duryodhana and his friends. No one objected to this injustice. The only voice against this brazen adharma was that of Vidhura and Sanjaya. Later, in the war of Kurukshettra, only Vidhura and Sanjaya were unhurt. Everyone else suffered for passively supporting the injustice.
Thus, just being innocents is not enough. The point that needs to be raised is whether those innocents have protested against the use of terrorism against India to achieve Kashmir?