OBOR News & Developments

Butter Chicken

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2016
Messages
9,645
Likes
69,203
Country flag
Work on $8.2b CPEC rail line unlikely to begin soon

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has been raising false hopes of early start of work on the $8.2-billion Mainline-I (ML-I) rail track under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as it has not yet finalised the mode of financing because of its huge implications for the country’s external debt.

An internal agreement on the exact financing modalities was essential before making a request to China for processing a loan, said sources in the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reform.

The project had already faced a delay of at least two years and there was still disagreement between the Ministry of Railways and other ministries, they said.

The Ministry of Finance and a financing group, set up to firm up funding modalities for the ML-I project, are in favour of acquiring the loan with sovereign guarantees, show documents.

In the case of sovereign guarantees, the $8.2-billion loan will not become part of Pakistan’s ballooning external debt of $85 billion. The responsibility of loan repayment will lie on the Ministry of Railways.

Under the May 2017 framework agreement, the project will be solely funded by China.

However, Pakistan Railways wants the central government to acquire the loan, which will not only make it part of the external debt, but will also shift the loan-servicing responsibility on to the centre.

The ML-I project is aimed at upgrading the existing 1,872-kilometre mainline of Pakistan Railways from Karachi to Peshawar. The project was planned to be completed in two phases between 2016 and 2020.

Now revised timelines suggest that the project cannot be completed before 2022 provided the government is able to start work this year.

For the past one and a half year, the government officials concerned have been giving false deadlines for signing the financing agreement with China.

Last month, Planning and Development Minister Ahsan Iqbal announced that groundbreaking of the ML-I project was expected in March 2018 and it would be completed in four years in various phases.

However, the Ministry of Railways has not yet submitted a new PC-I for first phase of the project to the planning ministry for approval. Iqbal had set the October 2017 deadline for the railways ministry for submission of the PC-I. Cost estimates have also remained inaccurate.

The government has decided to split the project into two parts due to its high cost and the work that requires refurbishment and expansion of the main rail line.

The decision to obtain sovereign guarantees had actually been taken in November 2016 by the then minister of finance.

The Economic Affairs Division was of the view that in case the loan was acquired by the central government, the cost of borrowing for Pakistan Railways would jump to 9% whereas the government would pay around 2% in interest to China.

Such loans are covered by the relending policy, under which the federal government takes responsibility of repaying the money and bears the exchange rate risk in return for recovering a fixed interest from the borrower.

China has told Pakistan that it will consider only that loan request which covers the entire rail track from Karachi to Peshawar and not up to Lahore.

Officials of the Ministry of Railways insist that any loan request to China should be in line with the spirit of the framework agreement, which was the central loan. They pointed out that the agreement clearly mentioned that the loan would be given on highly favourable terms.

Project feasibility and the scope had been finalised and the railways ministry was trying to make the cost as realistic as possible, they said.
 

lcafanboy

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
5,813
Likes
37,290
Country flag
Work on $8.2b CPEC rail line unlikely to begin soon

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has been raising false hopes of early start of work on the $8.2-billion Mainline-I (ML-I) rail track under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as it has not yet finalised the mode of financing because of its huge implications for the country’s external debt.

An internal agreement on the exact financing modalities was essential before making a request to China for processing a loan, said sources in the Ministry of Planning, Development and Reform.

The project had already faced a delay of at least two years and there was still disagreement between the Ministry of Railways and other ministries, they said.

The Ministry of Finance and a financing group, set up to firm up funding modalities for the ML-I project, are in favour of acquiring the loan with sovereign guarantees, show documents.

In the case of sovereign guarantees, the $8.2-billion loan will not become part of Pakistan’s ballooning external debt of $85 billion. The responsibility of loan repayment will lie on the Ministry of Railways.

Under the May 2017 framework agreement, the project will be solely funded by China.

However, Pakistan Railways wants the central government to acquire the loan, which will not only make it part of the external debt, but will also shift the loan-servicing responsibility on to the centre.

The ML-I project is aimed at upgrading the existing 1,872-kilometre mainline of Pakistan Railways from Karachi to Peshawar. The project was planned to be completed in two phases between 2016 and 2020.

Now revised timelines suggest that the project cannot be completed before 2022 provided the government is able to start work this year.

For the past one and a half year, the government officials concerned have been giving false deadlines for signing the financing agreement with China.

Last month, Planning and Development Minister Ahsan Iqbal announced that groundbreaking of the ML-I project was expected in March 2018 and it would be completed in four years in various phases.

However, the Ministry of Railways has not yet submitted a new PC-I for first phase of the project to the planning ministry for approval. Iqbal had set the October 2017 deadline for the railways ministry for submission of the PC-I. Cost estimates have also remained inaccurate.

The government has decided to split the project into two parts due to its high cost and the work that requires refurbishment and expansion of the main rail line.

The decision to obtain sovereign guarantees had actually been taken in November 2016 by the then minister of finance.

The Economic Affairs Division was of the view that in case the loan was acquired by the central government, the cost of borrowing for Pakistan Railways would jump to 9% whereas the government would pay around 2% in interest to China.

Such loans are covered by the relending policy, under which the federal government takes responsibility of repaying the money and bears the exchange rate risk in return for recovering a fixed interest from the borrower.

China has told Pakistan that it will consider only that loan request which covers the entire rail track from Karachi to Peshawar and not up to Lahore.

Officials of the Ministry of Railways insist that any loan request to China should be in line with the spirit of the framework agreement, which was the central loan. They pointed out that the agreement clearly mentioned that the loan would be given on highly favourable terms.

Project feasibility and the scope had been finalised and the railways ministry was trying to make the cost as realistic as possible, they said.
 

Butter Chicken

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2016
Messages
9,645
Likes
69,203
Country flag
#Gilgit: Protests by relatives of people from Peshawar and other areas languishing in jails in China.

I spent 10 years in a Chinese prison. I appeal to the Pakistan Government to bring back prisoners from China. I feel ashamed as the China-Pakistan friendship is totally fallacious. They just show off to the world, but nobody is aware of the reality: Nazir Ahmed,protester

 

AMCA

Senior Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,562
Likes
17,850
Country flag
#Gilgit: Protests by relatives of people from Peshawar and other areas languishing in jails in China.

I spent 10 years in a Chinese prison. I appeal to the Pakistan Government to bring back prisoners from China. I feel ashamed as the China-Pakistan friendship is totally fallacious. They just show off to the world, but nobody is aware of the reality: Nazir Ahmed,protester

Hope we create Ikhwaan type organization in PoK to liberate that area from illegal pakistani occupation.
 

Butter Chicken

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2016
Messages
9,645
Likes
69,203
Country flag
China’s ‘own courts’ for BRI rows raise eyebrows

China's recent announcement that it would establish courts under its own judicial system to handle international disputes arising from projects under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has triggered apprehensions that this would lead to dispute settlement on its unilateral terms and conditions.

The courts, which are to be based in Beijing, Xi'an and Shenzhen, have been established under the authority of the Supreme People's Court of China
, ET has learnt.

The Xi'an court will manage commercial disputes for the Silk Road Economic Belt, which connects China, West Asia and Europe. The Shenzhen court will manage commercial cases for the Maritime Silk Road, which connects China, Southeast Asia, Africa and Europe.

Chinese media has reported that the country will seek to promote the courts to resolve disputes that emerge from the BRI. Experts said that the courts could be similar to the International Commercial Court in Singapore and the International Finance Centre Courts in Dubai.

"It is unclear over which authority the Chinese have claimed jurisdiction over BRI disputes," said a recent brief on the issue by law firm Dezan Shira & Associates, which has been guiding foreign investors in India, ASEAN and China since 1992.

"There are existing mechanisms to deal with such matters, ranging from existing bilateral investment treaties to multilateral agreements such as those ASEAN has with China, the 2012 'Agreement on Dispute Settlement Mechanism of the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation'," said the brief, seen by ET.

Most bilateral treaties and the ASEAN treaty provide for similar conflict resolution processes: consultation, followed by mediation, followed by arbitration by an ad hoc arbitration tribunal, with no preset venue or choice of law, either procedural or substantive, according to the law firm.

The Chinese government is trying to force other sides to accept Chinese mediation and arbitration through its proposal to have these three courts rule on all BRI disputes, experts said.

The country's move to establish BRI-specific courts seems to alter that position, and move jurisdiction specifically to China on bilateral projects.

The memorandum of understanding (MoU) that China has signed with more 70 nations concerning cooperation on BRI projects does not appear to suggest any differing mechanisms for dealing with disputes, other than the usual terminology referring to "friendly consultations", though these may differ from case to case, according to Dezan Shira & Associates.

"The question concerning China's establishment of the BRI courts therefore revolves around the question of how this mechanism was agreed to between China and the BRI nations with which it has signed agreements," it said.

There are other existing alternatives to accepting arbitration in China. These include an agreement reached in September last year between the Singapore International Mediation Centre and the China Chamber of International Commerce Mediation Centre (CCOIC), which entered into an MoU to resolve BRI cross-border disputes.

"Despite these steps by China, the choice of arbitration venue and law, both procedural and substantive, should be left to negotiation between the concerned parties... third party jurisdictions with established rules and an experienced body of jurists are always preferable to those jurisdictions affiliated with one or the other of the parties to a contract," the law firm said.
 

Hiranyaksha

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
2,098
Likes
4,515
Country flag
So this illegal 969 MW Neelum Jhelum hydro power project 98% completed in PoK. Probably the first major project of CPEC in PoK about to be completed.


How much time it took ?
Timeline is as follow:

Source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neelum–Jhelum_Hydropower_Plant

Construction on the project began in 2008 after a Chinese consortium was awarded the construction contract in July 2007. The first generator is scheduled to be commissioned in July 2017 and the entire project is expected to be complete in December 2017.

Tunnel-boring machines (TBM) were brought to help speed up the excavation of the remaining tunnels. They became operational in February 2013.[7] The project was 66 percent complete as of August 2013 while at the same time the diversion tunnel was 75 percent complete.
 

Adioz

शक्तिः दुर्दम्येच्छाशक्त्याः आगच्छति
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
1,419
Likes
2,819
So this illegal 969 MW Neelum Jhelum hydro power project 98% completed in PoK. Probably the first major project of CPEC in PoK about to be completed.


How much time it took ?
What happens to this dam when we divert water from Neelum river into the Kishanganga dam?

I don't know why GOI is allowing such developments to happen.
Maybe they are planning on lobbing a couple of mortar bombs on the dam on the day it is inaugurated?
 

Hiranyaksha

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
2,098
Likes
4,515
Country flag
What happens to this dam when we divert water from Neelum river into the Kishanganga dam?
Till my understanding . Not much.
Source: https://www.asil.org/insights/volum...ters-kishenganga-arbitration-pakistan-v-india





Source: https://sites.google.com/site/constructionofdamscom/dam-pics


Maybe they are planning on lobbing a couple of mortar bombs on the dam on the day it is inaugurated?
I don't think so. Both Kishanganga dam and Station can be bombed too.
 

AMCA

Senior Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,562
Likes
17,850
Country flag
China trade

China woos Pakistan militants to secure Belt and Road projects

Beijing in talks with tribal separatists in Baluchistan to protect $60bn investment


Gwadar port in Pakistan's south-western state of Baluchistan. The port is the linchpin of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor © AFP

February 19, 2018 1:20 am by Farhan Bokhari in Islamabad and Kiran Stacey in New Delhi
China has been quietly holding talks with Pakistani tribal separatists for more than five years in an effort to protect the $60bn worth of infrastructure projects it is financing as part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.
Three people with knowledge of the talks told the Financial Times that Beijing had been in direct contact with militants in the south-western state of Baluchistan, where many of the scheme’s most important projects are located.
For more than half a century, Beijing has maintained a policy of non-interference in the domestic politics of other countries. But that has been tested by its desire to protect the billions of dollars it is investing around the world under its Belt and Road Initiative to create a “new Silk Road” of trade routes in Europe, Asia and Africa.
In Pakistan, Beijing appears keen to fill the void left by Washington, which has drifted from its former ally after becoming frustrated at Islamabad’s failure to tackle extremism. Beijing’s willingness to get involved in Pakistani politics has fuelled concerns in New Delhi, which is worried about China’s growing political influence in neighbouring countries, including Nepal, Myanmar and Sri Lanka.
“The Chinese have quietly made a lot of progress,” said one Pakistani official. “Even though separatists occasionally try to carry out the odd attack, they are not making a forceful push.”
As it seeks to boost the Chinese economy, China’s plans for a new Silk Road has pitched Beijing into some of the world’s most complex conflict zones.

The Belt and Road Initiative is portrayed as an economic project . . . but, increasingly, it has significant local political and strategic dimensions
Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, International Institute for Strategic Studies
Chinese peacekeepers are already in South Sudan, where Beijing has invested in oilfields and is planning to build a rail line. China has also contributed troops to a UN peacekeeping operation in Mali and even talked about launching attacks against Isis in Iraq, where it has been the largest foreign investor in the country’s oil sector.
Pakistan, which is set to be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the infrastructure initiative, is one of the riskiest parts of the world to do business. Last year 10 Chinese workers were killed by unidentified gunmen while working near Gwadar port, the linchpin of the economic corridor.
Some have warned that China’s investment could lead to Pakistan being treated like a client state by Beijing, despite promises that Chinese troops would not be stationed there.
“The Belt and Road Initiative is portrayed as an economic project to boost infrastructure and connectivity but, increasingly, it has significant local political and strategic dimensions,” said Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, senior fellow at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
Pakistani officials, however, have welcomed the talks between Baluch rebels and Chinese envoys, even if they do not know the details of what has been discussed. “Ultimately, if there’s peace in Baluchistan, that will benefit both of us,” said one official in Islamabad.

Recommended

Another said the recent decision by the US to suspend security assistance to Pakistan had convinced many in Islamabad that China is a more genuine partner. “[The Chinese] are here to stay and help Pakistan, unlike the Americans, who cannot be trusted,” the person said.
Pakistan is planning to buy Chinese military helicopters and components for surveillance drones as part of its plan to fortify its border with Afghanistan with a 2,600km-long fence.
Chinese officials did not comment on the talks, though the Chinese ambassador to Islamabad said in a recent interview with the BBC that militants in Baluchistan were no longer a threat to the economic corridor.
One provincial tribal leader said many young men had been persuaded to lay down their weapons by the promise of financial benefits. “Today, young men are not getting attracted to join the insurgents as they did some 10 years ago,” he said. “Many people see prosperity” as a result of the China-Pakistan corridor, he said
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top