Nag anti-tank Missile

Bornubus

Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
7,494
Likes
17,198
Nag was the last missile system under Integrated missile development projects. What is the future R&D by DRDO look like?
To make the advance variants of these Missiles. The basic Missiles are already near obsolete.

For example basic Pinaka is evolving into 120 km capable of firing guided munitions.


Astra will be evolved into true 100 ~ km BVR
 

Adioz

शक्तिः दुर्दम्येच्छाशक्त्याः आगच्छति
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
1,419
Likes
2,819
Yeah fire 6 Nags to destroy an APS mounted tanks. Saturation. APS is overwhelmed. Better produce a missile with multiple precursor rounds to fool the APS.
Namica is part of a combined arms formation. Its role is to fire Nag ATGMs at a designated target. You want to chuck dummy rounds to trigger the Trophy prematurely and then have Nag hit the target at the very next instant? Design another platform for it. And yeah, good luck having it work in real world conditions. The closest you could come would be the RPG-30.
 

armyofhind

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
1,535
Likes
2,921
Country flag
With APS Nag is ineffective. Israelis have mounted Trophy, soon Chinese and Pakistanis are going to mount too. Nag is ineffective before it even started.
Pakistan doesnt have the money to put an APS on all their tanks.
That apart, an APS isnt foolproof. Performance against top attack munitions isnt stellar.
One case in point, fighting in an environment wherein an active jammer is functioning for MMW bandwidths.

Also, there will always be vehicles like APCs and IFVs unprotected by APS.
 

India22

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
629
Likes
322
Namica is part of a combined arms formation. Its role is to fire Nag ATGMs at a designated target. You want to chuck dummy rounds to trigger the Trophy prematurely and then have Nag hit the target at the very next instant? Design another platform for it. And yeah, good luck having it work in real world conditions. The closest you could come would be the RPG-30.
That's what was in my mind. RPG 30.

We can also use EMP jammer. I have some ideas though. Come to private conversation.
 

uoftotaku

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
937
Likes
3,544
Country flag
I always wonder on the emission pattern of NAG. Never seen anything like this on any other missile. Any specific reason for that? :hmm:
The rocket motor does double duty as both propulsion and directional stabilizer / steering. Its quite common in shoulder launched missiles actually. The main engine and propellant are in the center section just behind the warhead, guidance (especially if SACLOS or Wire type is used) goes in the back facing the launcher for easier control. Also imparts better weight balance to the missile as the propellant gets exhausted, otherwise missile would get front heavy in terminal stage,affecting accuracy
 

shiphone

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
2,163
Likes
2,479
Country flag
dear... this layout is quite common especially on ATGM layouts..

the famous BGM-71 TOW and its sustainer mortor..



normally on this layout of missile, the rear end was occupied by the 'Beacon' and 'Wire Dispenser' ...in NAG's case, the rear part is for the sustainer motor



-------------------
RedArrow 9,10,12

191012juyoflmyxr91ih2f.jpg
QQ截图20161206134432.jpg
 
Last edited:

airtel

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
3,430
Likes
7,814
Country flag
India's Nag ATGM has completed development trials with a flourish -- a series of bang-on tests in September (photo below). While the Army has been involved in these trials, user trials will now follow in an accelerated regime.

source -LiveFist
 

Abhi9

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2012
Messages
562
Likes
1,582
Country flag
Hi Indra Network Posted some details about the DRDO man portable anti tank guided missile



The DETAILS are as follows –

MISSILE :

  • WEIGHT : 14.5 kg
  • LENGTH : 1.3 m
  • DIAMETER : 120 mm
  • OPERTIONAL RANGE : 200 mm to 2.5 km
  • LOCK-ON-BEFORE-LAUCH (LOBL) guidance with a passive homing IIR Seeker
  • ‘Soft’ launch propulsion system for gunner safety
LAUNCHER SYSTEM

  • Command launch unit (CLU) consisting of Target Acquisition System (TAS) and Command Control Unit (CCU)
  • WEIGHT : 14.25 kg
Credits: Indra Network.
 

Scrutator

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
345
Likes
289
Hi Indra Network Posted some details about the DRDO man portable anti tank guided missile



The DETAILS are as follows –

MISSILE :

  • WEIGHT : 14.5 kg
  • LENGTH : 1.3 m
  • DIAMETER : 120 mm
  • OPERTIONAL RANGE : 200 mm to 2.5 km
  • LOCK-ON-BEFORE-LAUCH (LOBL) guidance with a passive homing IIR Seeker
  • ‘Soft’ launch propulsion system for gunner safety
LAUNCHER SYSTEM

  • Command launch unit (CLU) consisting of Target Acquisition System (TAS) and Command Control Unit (CCU)
  • WEIGHT : 14.25 kg
Credits: Indra Network.
Thanks!
The min range is really 200 mm (or more like 200 m? )?
 

HariPrasad-1

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
9,621
Likes
21,088
Country flag
US had offered joint R & D on Javlin but DRDO decided to go itself. They said that they think that it would be ready in 2 years. Let us wait. NAg program is almost a failure so we should use its technologies in this missile.
 

Scrutator

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
345
Likes
289
Let us wait. Nag program is almost a failure
Is that confirmed? Thought they put in a higher resolution seeker which performed well.
I am more concerned about this seeker from the Helina perspective (even though the Helina missile has morphed into something different from Nag, they do share the seeke)r. Helina has a big bearing on the LCH/Rudra program!!!!
 

HariPrasad-1

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
9,621
Likes
21,088
Country flag
Is that confirmed? Thought they put in a higher resolution seeker which performed well.
I am more concerned about this seeker from the Helina perspective (even though the Helina missile has morphed into something different from Nag, they do share the seeke)r. Helina has a big bearing on the LCH/Rudra program!!!!
Nag will require a big vehicle to carry them and they just offer some 1.5 KM range extension advantage. India has already bought a huge numbers of Russian and Israeli missiles. Even if Nag succeeds, what Indian army will do with them. Nag should have come a decade ago.
 

Scrutator

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
345
Likes
289
Nag will require a big vehicle to carry them and they just offer some 1.5 KM range extension advantage. India has already bought a huge numbers of Russian and Israeli missiles. Even if Nag succeeds, what Indian army will do with them. Nag should have come a decade ago.
Agreed. Nag/Namica role always appeared funky to me! In fact I feel they should ditch the original design of Nag (that was restricted to work with LOBL mode) and use the heli based Nag (Not the current version of Helina - but the stop-gap Nag variant created with an RF link and extended range to test on Rudra, this has the LOAL mode and 7km range). This would come close to Spike. Perhaps even extend it's range further and make it like Spike-ER.
The Spike missiles purchased were not in very large quantity (they're pretty expensive!!!).
The Russian Invars (again very expensive) are slated to be fitted onto BMP-2 during their upgrade.
Namica may be ditched in entirety. The future FICV may hold more promise for Nag like missile.
 

HariPrasad-1

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
9,621
Likes
21,088
Country flag
The Russian Invars (again very expensive) are slated to be fitted onto BMP-2 during their upgrade.
They are not costly. They will be made in India and we have to pay some 2000 USD royalty to Russia for every piece we produce.
 

Scrutator

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
345
Likes
289
They are not costly. They will be made in India and we have to pay some 2000 USD royalty to Russia for every piece we produce.
So much for royalty! But what about the total cost of manufacture (even when done in India)? If I remember correctly, India paid around a $1 million for each launcher with a bundle of 10 (?) missiles.
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
Ambassador
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,042
Besides your knowledge about NAG is little bigger with little more range, What is else makes it different which insisted Army to support its development to till this day, The technology implemented on it was not there a decade ago in this part of world, Nor those Russian have, Their is no Israeli ATGM in Army and the version Army wants is not yet fully operational in IDF itself ..

We Indians have a well oiled scientific and military community, You are on Indian forum and best learn before putting it out, Their is a thread here on that subject best go through it..

Nag will require a big vehicle to carry them and they just offer some 1.5 KM range extension advantage. India has already bought a huge numbers of Russian and Israeli missiles. Even if Nag succeeds, what Indian army will do with them. Nag should have come a decade ago.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top