Yes, great, a country who hasn't test her H-bomb design yet is talking about the quality.
The fact is India has neither quantity, nor quality, to annihilate Pakistan. Of course, for the fan boy, one Indian nuke could equal 100 Pakistan or Chinese nuke.
Thats Afghan weed talking..coupled with chinese madrassa education.
paki fan boy from china trying to be awesomely stupid for pakistan countering all commonsense and facts.
We know that even 1 pakistani painted chinese nukes cant do much against India..
Mushraff learned it the real real hard way during Kargil.
Simply throwing a nuclear weapon in the battlefield doesn't make it a tactic weapon, all right?
Tactic nuclear weapon is generally designed with low yield (less than 10k) and equipped on highly precise delivery weapon, aiming at smaller target. More importantly, tactic weapon is commanded by battlefield commander. You need to give this level commander the authorization to decide where, when and how to use tactic nuke in a battle. This will require a lot of drill. Did you ever see Pakistan hold any drill with tactic nuclear involved?
Really?Wow!! So much of new information...(Note the sarcasm)
Thats the exact worry for a nuke warfare..because tactical nukes are controlled and commanded by battlefield commanders..and we know how fanatics these battle field commander of pak army is.. A single battle field commander bend on jihad could invoke a dilemma annihilating pakistan as a whole.
pak army is not a very professional agency.. Read the following article and you will understand why even chinese dont trust the even the mid level ranks of pak army..forget low level ranks.
Do nations conduct drills with live nukes?
No Stupid..they conduct and test delivery mechanism for tactical nukes which pakis have conducted enough already.
And again if there is a drill with an element of nukes involved think about the escalation in South Asia..
with pakistan getting cornered big time from all angles including from china.pakistan would become untouchable for china.
Maybe you should listen as well.
May be you should read a lot as well!!!
I am listening very well to your stupid facts and its all a joke.
No, Chinese doesn't hold Pakistan government responsible for that. Instead, t
hey blame the militant group within Pakistan. And Pakistan army is fighting a war against these groups now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_North-West_Pakistan
http://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/pakistani
http://tribune.com.pk/story/221828/china-blames-xinjiang-unrest-on-terrorists/
Xinjiang unrest: China blames unrest on Pakistan-trained terrorists
The Pakistani Foreign Ministry has not commented yet, but the
allegations that camps in Pakistan helped trained Chinese militants will only increase pressure on Pakistani authorities which the U.S. has accused of cosying-up to some of the Islamist fundamentalist organisations operating in the country.
Its from inside pakistan, the exact version what India has already said many times... Thats what the chinese blamed pakistan on...the militants getting trained in pakistan with much support of their intel agency. The same worry India shared with the rest of the world on pakistan.
May be they are not doing enough in the WoT Drama.
And Pakistan army is fighting a war against these groups now.
seems like paki showed chinese the cold shoulder on East Turkestan
http://blogs.reuters.com/india/2009/07/09/xinjiang-the-spreading-arc-of-instability/
Pakistan’s
Daily Times noted the Chinese concerns,
but said Islamabad could only play a limited role given that it was itself fighting to regain control of its territory in the northwest from the militants.
The Xinjiangistan Connection
With terror attacks on the rise, officials in Beijing are increasingly worried that Pakistan is an incubator of Islamic radicalism across China.
When the Pakistani army launched its campaign in the militant-riddled tribal region North Waziristan in June, it was tempting to attribute the operation to U.S. pressure. For many years, Washington has been urging Pakistan to move against this terrorist haven, situated in the northwest corner of the country on the Afghan border. Indeed, only weeks earlier,the U.S.Congress
made the initiation of operations there — which involved
tens of thousands of Pakistani troops and the evacuation of nearly
half a million people— a precondition for future military assistance. But the security needs of China, Pakistan’s "
all-weather friend," probably proved even more important than Congress in Islamabad’s calculations.
China is struggling with its worst series of terrorist attacks in decades. Xinjiang, a Muslim region in China’s northwest bordering Pakistan, has long been wracked with tension between the Chinese government, the swelling ranks of Han Chinese migrants, and the native population of Uighurs, a Turkic-speaking Muslim people. Especially over the last year, disgruntled Uighurs — often acting in armed groups demanding greater autonomy or a fully independent state of East Turkistan — have been a thorn in Beijing’s side.Chinese state media
reported that on July 29, dozens of people were killed or injured after a knife-wielding gang attacked a police station in Xinjiang — only the latest in a long series of deadly incidents in that region.''
,..........
China understood Pakistan’s hesitation to launch a full-scale assault in North Waziristan — the presence of militant groups
backed by its intelligence services,
the risk of blowback, and the sheer numbers of troops required weighed heavily in Islamabad’s calculations. But
Beijing has started to question whether the resilience of the Uighur militant groups might also be tied to religious sympathies among Pakistan’s armed forces.
Beijing appears to trust the top ranks of the Pakistani army — including the new Chief of Army Staff Gen. Raheel Sharif —
but worries about the younger generations that have come through the system since the "Islamization" of Pakistani society and the army over the last 35 years. "We’re not worried about the generals, we’re worried about the brigadiers," one Chinese analyst put it. In other words, top officers are sufficiently secular for Chinese tastes; the lower ranks are not.
Privately, Chinese officials and experts complain that the Pakistanis have given Uighur militants a heads-up. "When we provide them with intelligence on ETIM locations they give warnings before launching their attacks," groused a Chinese analyst familiar with intelligence issues. 
Foreign intelligence services have even provided material to Chinese officials that purports to show Pakistani intelligence agents at TIP training camps. "We certainly think there’s a strong chance [Pakistani intelligence] has contacts and relationships with ETIM and the Uzbeks," said a Chinese official familiar with intelligence issues.
....
And Chinese analysts note a visible lack of willingness among some Pakistani officers to respond to Beijing’s requests.
"We see it in their eyes when we’re sitting in the meetings," said a Chinese analyst with ties to China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA)."They’re not comfortable with what we’re asking.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/07/30/the-xinjiangistan-connection/
According to
reports, the Chinese military is currently engaged in halting the flow of terrorists from Pakistan up the
Karakorum Highway and through the
Khunjerab Pass into Xinjiang. China would like Pakistan stem the tide of Uyghur militants into China.
The failure of Pakistan’s military to do so have led to suspicions in China that some mid-level members of Pakistan’s army are sympathetic to the Uyghur militants and that the problem is not due to Pakistan’s incapacity to eliminate militants in Waziristan. Many of these sympathetic soldiers have been influenced by Pakistan’s Islamization policies since the 1980s.
Many Chinese officials believe that Pakistan’s intelligence services have contracts with Uyghur militants who may be used, if needed, in places like Kashmir and Afghanistan. As such, Pakistanis are unwilling to fully take out the Uyghur militants within their borders.
http://thediplomat.com/2014/08/china-wonders-if-pakistan-is-responsible-for-xinjiang-violence/
