Indian nuclear submarines

Vinod DX9

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Messages
1,356
Likes
4,409
Country flag
I am trying to give some explanation
Still now we have got three names of Indian nuclear submarine
INS Arihant
INS Aridhaman &
INS Arighat
Now here as an explanation how, both Aridhaman and Arighat exists still it's third SSBN

Arihant+test+REACTOR+2.jpg

This is S1, prototype nuclear reactor
FB_IMG_1512964584869.jpg

INS Arihant...a mini SSBN but a primary SSN actually. First nuclear submarine. Possibly prototype or tech demo of our six unnamed SSN to be made.
FB_IMG_1512964587079.jpg

A recent video shows this. It is neither Arihant class nor Kalvari...then it is INS Aridhaman,unless video makers did a mistake
Irrespective of video, INS Aridhaman is first SSBN actually and second nuclear Sub. First in Aridhaman class. And possibly this is actually S2 instead S3.

INS Arighat is third nucler submarine. Second in Aridhaman class and second SSBN. Thus it is S3. After that S4 snd S4* will be moved.

This explains and satisfy both the previous infos and new by Sandeep Unnithan.
 

captscooby81

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2016
Messages
7,022
Likes
26,823
Country flag
A peek into India's top secret and costliest defence project, nuclear submarines

India's top secret nuclear submarine project reached another decadal milestone last month with the launch of a second ballistic missile submarine, the Arighat . On November 19, Union defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman cracked the auspicious coconut on the fin of the submarine in the drydock of the Ship Building Centre (SBC) in Visakhapatnam in a low-key ceremony. Following this, the SBC's drydock was flooded and the submarine quietly floated out. It will be at least another three years before the navy commissions the Arighat.

The event skipped the high-profile public ceremony of the Arihant's launch in 2009 even as the four-decade Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) project to field a series of ballistic missile firing nuclear submarines is now moving at a furious assembly-line pace.

Two new units, the S4 and S4 'star', displacing over 1,000 tonnes more than the Arihant class will move into the SBC drydock vacated by the two Arihant class submarines. These submarines, fitted with eight ballistic missiles or twice the Arihant's missile load, will be launched by 2020 and 2022. An official says the Arighat launch has more to do with creating more work space within the cramped SBC for assembling the S4 and S4*. The ATV project is India's costliest defence project. The programme to build four SSBNs (hull classification symbol for a nuclear-powered, ballistic missile-carrying submarine) is India's largest defence programme, estimated at Rs 90,000 crore. Each of these nuclear-powered sharks costs upwards of Rs 4,000 crore, not counting the infrastructure created by the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) to build their nuclear powered reactors and the Defence Research and Development Organisation's (DRDO) submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs).

The project's pan-India spread-headquartered in New Delhi, hull fabrication facility in Gujarat, missile development in Hyderabad, nuclear reactor in Tamil Nadu and final assembly in Visakhapatnam-is the biggest Make in India industrial ecosystem-nearly 60 per cent of the submarine's components are indigenous. It is also the cornerstone of Indo-Russian strategic cooperation; top officials admit the project would not have been possible without extensive Russian design and technical assistance. Ahead of the submarine arm's golden jubilee on December 8, the ATV programme has nearly doubled in size with a Rs 60,000 crore project to build six indigenous nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs).

"It has kicked off, " navy chief Admiral Sunil Lanba told the media about the SSN project on December 1. "It is a classified project? the process has started." Design work for the indigenous SSNs displacing around 6,000 tonnes is under way at a newly constructed submarine design centre in Gurgaon. SSNs are armed with conventional cruise missiles and torpedoes but powered by nuclear reactors which give it excellent underwater speed and endurance.

The navy has opened up talks for the lease of another Akula-class submarine from Russia for over $2 billion, to replace the existing INS Chakra when it is returned in 2022 after the end of its lease. (The Chakra is currently non-operational after an incident last August). Meanwhile, final design work is under way on a new series of 13,500-tonne ballistic missile submarines. Called the 'S-5', it will be twice the weight of the Arihant class SSBNs and armed with 12 nuclear-tipped missiles. Earlier this year, the DRDO flagged off its K-6 SLBM project, a missile with an ICBM-like range of 6,000 km. The first phase of Project Varsha, a nuclear submarine base, will be completed by 2022. The base will house India's SSBN fleet in concrete pens blasted out of the hills at Rambilli 50 km south of Visakhapatnam, reportedly at a cost of Rs 30,000 .

THE THIRD LEG OF THE TRIAD

The Arighat, like the Arihant, is a ballistic missile submarine or a boomer because it carries nuclear-tipped missiles and forms the third leg of a triad of air, land and sea-based nuclear weapon carrying platforms, enunciated in India's draft nuclear doctrine after the May 1998 Pokharan-2 nuclear tests. When India observes the 20th anniversary of the tests five months from now, it will have a modest sea-based deterrent with one SSBN in service and a second soon to join it.

"The triad becomes effective when you have a submarine operational at all times. In our case, a triad is operational only part of the time-when the Arihant sails out to sea," says strategic analyst Bharat Karnad. When an Indian SSBN sails out of Visakhapatnam and into the Bay of Bengal, it can virtually disappear for months, remaining underwater, its endurance limited only by the endurance of its crew, communicating only through extremely low frequency (ELF) antennae which it trails in the water. While bombers, mobile missile launchers, missile trains and ground-based launchers can be tracked, nuclear submarines are virtually undetectable. This is what makes them the most precious asset of the nuclear triad.

Submarines thus become an important component of India's 'no first use' policy for nuclear weapons because they act as guarantors of 'assured retaliation' or a second-strike, preventing any surprise first-strike by a nuclear-armed adversary. They are vital at a time when China's PLA Rocket Forces can target any point on the Indian mainland with nuclear tipped missiles and India has fewer retaliatory options.

The Arihant has so far been equipped with 12 B-05 SLBMs which have a range of 750 km-which means a distant transit to an adversary's shores. A 3,500-km range missile, the 'K-4' is still in trials-the DRDO is to conduct a fourth test of the missile sometime in December, from a specially designed submersible pontoon launcher in the Bay of Bengal. Final tests of the K-4 from the Arihant are due in the Bay of Bengal in the near future. These are to be followed by tests of a K-5 missile, a 5,000-km SLBM, a project started in 2015. The 'K series' missiles are all named after former president A.P.J. Abdul Kalam. The K-4 and K-5, each of which can carry a two-tonne warhead will give the triad a longer, more robust leg.

Information about the ATV project is meagre. It operates directly under the supervision of national security advisor Ajit Doval and is now wrapped in deep levels of secrecy. A navy proposal for a high-profile launch of the Arighat where the PM and cabinet ministers would be present was overruled by the PMO. Security around the project is the heaviest for any publicly known military facility (the navy recently cited security concerns to acquire a public road passing near the SBC in Visakhapatnam).

Naval top brass are chary of even discussing the project either in public or in private. "That (the ATV) is a classified project... I'm not going to take any questions on that," navy chief Admiral Sunil Lanba told the media a press conference on December 1, a marked departure from a predecessor who claimed, rather disingenously in 2010, of the INS Arihant undertaking 'a deterrent patrol by 2012'. The Arihant was inducted into service in August last year after weapon trials but continues to undertake extensive trials but without a prolonged sea deployment. An actual deterrent patrol-where a nuclear-missile armed submarine goes into its operational area armed with nuclear warheads-is thought to be further away.

The launch of the Arighat comes amidst fast-changing geopolitical developments. The Chinese navy has deployed and initiated the fastest submarine expansion of any navy since the end of the Cold War with an operational undersea force of 63 vessels-5 SSNs, 4 SSBNs and 54 SSKs.

It recently sold a class of eight conventionally powered diesel-electric submarines to Pakistan, at least some of which are likely to be fitted with nuclear-tipped missiles.

"Sea-based deterrents are going to become more important as time passes, especially for a country with a no-first use policy," says strategic analyst Rear Admiral Raja Menon (retired). "The location of your nuclear weapons becomes known and even a half per cent knowledge of your existing weapon sites each year could add up to something substantial over the years, thus degrading your deterrent."

THE HUNTER-KILLERS

A solitary two-month patrol by a Chinese submarine in late 2013 came as a rude wake-up call for India's security establishment. Chinas most advanced SSN, a Shang class, sailed out from its bastion in Hainan island on December 13, 2013 and returned after a two-month 'anti-piracy' patrol in the Indian Ocean, on February 12, 2014. R&AW assessments termed the deployment 'seriously aggravated India's security concerns'. The ATV headquarters soon dusted out plans for building a series of six indigenous SSNs, shelved by the government over a decade ago due to budgetary constraints. Plans called for a series of submarines capable of speeds of over 25 knots and diving to 500 metres.

SSNs are like multi-role fighter jets, ferocious underwater predators. The navy's INS Chakra, for instance, can run underwater at speeds of close to 30 knots, more than twice the speed of conventional diesel-electric submarines, stalk and hunt warships and attack shore targets.

But like fighter jets, their performance lies in their propulsion plant, in this case a high output nuclear reactor which can cope with the tremendous bursts of sustained speed without degrading reactor output. And this is where the Indian Navy and BARC are said to be staring at a technological abyss. An 83 MW SSBN reactor like that of the Arihant, is essentially meant for slow, steady operation, using it onboard an SSN would call for more frequent refuelling cycles.

One solution believed to be under contemplation is for BARC to design a twin-reactor configuration for the SSN to meet its increased power demands. Another solution currently being explored would be to get foreign design assistance and leapfrog from India's second generation reactor technology to fourth gen.

DREAMS OF A BEHEMOTH

The ATV headquarters building in New Delhi's cantonment area has a rather unusual name: 'Akanksha' or desire. Since its start in the 1970s, the nuclear submarine project has been a dream-never constrained by finance, only by technology.

There's a reason for the modest size of the Arihant class submarines and why they are called 'baby boomers'. When the Pokharan-2 nuclear tests announced India's entry as a nuclear weapons power, the Arihant class were meant to be SSNs. Post the tests, they were converted into SSBNs-DRDO inserted a plug with four short-ranged ballistic missiles. The design got another tweak a decade ago after an intervention from then finance minister P. Chidambaram who was on the political committee which monitors the classified programme. The minister questioned the billions being spent on a boat launching just four nuclear tipped missiles. The ATV project team came back with an 'Arihant-stretch'-an additional 10-metre-long plug for four K-4 SLBMs to be integrated into the S-4, then on the design board. The plug would increase the weight of the submarine by nearly 1,000 tonnes without significantly altering its performance. An additional unit, the S-4* was sanctioned in 2012 when it became clear that the S-5 would take a longer development cycle and would result in the ATV line being idle.

Plans for building a new series of strategic nuclear submarines had begun over a decade ago when the missile payload and reactor capacity constraints of the Arihant class submarines became evident.

In 2006, a high-level committee under Dr R. Chidambaram, principal scientific advisor to the government of India, assessed India's ability to design and construct a class of three new SSBNs the 'S5', to be fielded beginning in 2021. It budgeted Rs 10,000 crore, to be divided among BARC, DRDO and the ATV project headquarters, to begin the project by 2015. The project continued in the development stage and an indication of a possible long lead construction time began when the government sanctioned a fourth unit around five years ago (squeezed between the two projects as the 4*) to keep the nuclear submarine line employed. (S-1 being the shore-based pressurised water reactor at the DAE facility in Kalpakkam, iterations of which are on the Arihant class.)

The S-5 is the true-blue SSBN on par with those fielded by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council.

Plans drawn up over a decade ago called for an SSBN of 13,500 tonnes, a behemoth displacing nearly the weight of India's first aircraft carrier the INS Vikrant and armed with 12 SLBMs with ranges of 6,000 km and with multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle (MIRV) capability.

In February this year, the DRDO's Hyderabad-based Advanced Naval Systems began a fourth separate SLBM project-the K-6 missile. This three-stage solid-fuel missile with a 6,000 km range is said to be completely different from the K-4 and K-5. It will carry MIRVs and will be ready for induction in less than a decade. These new missiles, over 12 metres tall and over 2 metres in diameter, will carry a three-tonne warhead. The K-6 will ensure that the future Indian SSBN's bastion area will be within the Bay of Bengal, from where it can target all its potential adversaries. A former head of India's Strategic Forces Command hinted at this in a 2014 think tank event in Washington when he said that India's sea-based deterrent would eventually "be secured in havens, waters we are pretty sure of, by virtue of the range of the missiles. We will be operating in a pool in our own maritime backyard." From the safety of its depths, Indian SSBNs would be able to target all its potential adversaries with its 6,000-km range ballistic missiles (SLBMs).

The SSBN fleet is based on the east coast for reasons of geography-the Indian continental shelf dips sharply into the abyssal Bengal fan. A submarine can dive and be concealed just 2 nautical miles from harbor (a submarine on the west coast can dive only after sailing out for 80 nautical miles).

The S-5 is on the drawing board but the project team has already started ordering its ancillary equipment. A new dockyard is being created at the SBC and sources say the project will have an indigenous component of over 80 per cent when they are built a decade from now.

Yet, as is the case with the indigenous SSN, the main challenge in building the S-5 lies in its propulsion plant-a 190-MW nuclear plant- says an official familiar with the project. Development work has started on this new plant will have thrice the output of the Arihant's 83 MW reactor which uses Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU). A former BARC official and part of the Reactor Projects Division which built the Arihant's reactor is confident the 83 MW can be scaled up. "One of the biggest challenges in a naval reactor is compacting it to fit a confined space. Since the new platform (S-5) will have a bigger volume and displacement, upscaling the present reactor should be no problem."- Without a breakthrough in propulsion technology, India's sea-based deterrent will continue to be a modest one.

 

ramdas hegde

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
62
Likes
64
some time back i read somewhere that Arihant launch in 2009 was just political show. Arihant was at that time just hull not complete Submarine.
than Arihant was redocked and completed. that was probably in 2012. In 2013 after initial trails reactor attained criticality.after a year of trails Arihant's sea trails began in 2014 dec.
Arihant never tested K4 because it is still in tests.
Arighat's construction began in probably 2011 or 2012 (after Arihant's construction completed)
it took 7-8 years to complete Arighat. if Arighat is compleate than it's reactor would be get critical in about 8-9 months i.e 2018 Aug.
than a year of tests basin trails etc ,than Arighat would head out for sea trails ie 2019 Aug-sep.
Than after a year of trails it would join Navy (assuming that this time trails take only a year)
S4's assemby already started means they adopted block construction.
and if it took 3 years to assemble all blocks S4 would get launched in 2020-21.
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
some time back i read somewhere that Arihant launch in 2009 was just political show. Arihant was at that time just hull not complete Submarine.
than Arihant was redocked and completed. that was probably in 2012. In 2013 after initial trails reactor attained criticality.after a year of trails Arihant's sea trails began in 2014 dec.
Arihant never tested K4 because it is still in tests.
Arighat's construction began in probably 2011 or 2012 (after Arihant's construction completed)
it took 7-8 years to complete Arighat. if Arighat is compleate than it's reactor would be get critical in about 8-9 months i.e 2018 Aug.
than a year of tests basin trails etc ,than Arighat would head out for sea trails ie 2019 Aug-sep.
Than after a year of trails it would join Navy (assuming that this time trails take only a year)
S4's assemby already started means they adopted block construction.
and if it took 3 years to assemble all blocks S4 would get launched in 2020-21.
You are saying that in 2009 Arihant launch was just a show but continue to say that Arighat was started in 2011-2. Why would anyone start construction of a second submarine without finalising first one? Won't they wait for the faults and test data? Arighat was also a bigger submarine and hence needed a different design and bigger reactor.

Also, who told you that a submarine needs 7 years to make? It needs 3 years to make a submarine from scratch.
 

ramdas hegde

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
62
Likes
64
You are saying that in 2009 Arihant launch was just a show but continue to say that Arighat was started in 2011-2. Why would anyone start construction of a second submarine without finalising first one? Won't they wait for the faults and test data? Arighat was also a bigger submarine and hence needed a different design and bigger reactor.

Also, who told you that a submarine needs 7 years to make? It needs 3 years to make a submarine from scratch.
I am saying that Arihant vecated SBC in 2011-12 than Arighat's construction bigan.
even 5-6 years of time will require for SSK Construction Arighat is SSBN - larger and more complex than SSK. And it's just second SSBN built in india so obviously it take longer time.
And there's also preparation time which we don't now how long.
and this is my take, i just observed all those old reports, information and events than rearranged tham to what could be a real series of events
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
I am saying that Arihant vecated SBC in 2011-12 than Arighat's construction bigan.
even 5-6 years of time will require for SSK Construction Arighat is SSBN - larger and more complex than SSK. And it's just second SSBN built in india so obviously it take longer time.
And there's also preparation time which we don't now how long.
and this is my take, i just observed all those old reports, information and events than rearranged tham to what could be a real series of events
http://idrw.org/ins-arighat-indias-second-nuclear-submarine/

Here is a new article about arighat. There is quite a bit of speculation involved
 

Babloo Singh

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2015
Messages
520
Likes
3,272
Country flag
Two new units, the S4 and S4 'star', displacing over 1,000 tonnes more than the Arihant class will move into the SBC drydock vacated by the two Arihant class submarines. These submarines, fitted with eight ballistic missiles or twice the Arihant's missile load, will be launched by 2020 and 2022. An official says the Arighat launch has more to do with creating more work space within the cramped SBC for assembling the S4 and S4*.
This from Sandeep Unnithan is what had me wondering....
S-2 & S-3 were moved out to create space for S-4 & S-4* so we can work on two subs at a time.
S-2 Arihant was launched in 2009 or if we go by what some people are saying it was again taken to dry dock and work was going on till 2012.
So 2012 S-2 Arihant went out.... assuming the second berth was empty.. Or some preparatory work on S-3 was going on ?
Since 2012 Ideally they would be working on two Subs, now if they are launching Arighat to create space for both S-4 & S-4* then what was there on second berth ? We are talking about 5+ Years from 2012.
Scenario-1 : Aridhaman was launched out earlier & now Arighat launched to clear both berth.

Scenario-2 : If Arighat is S-3 than we are working on S-4 for 3-4 Yrs and now we have construction experience
too...

Scenario-3 : If we can work on two Subs at a time why suddenly we have space crunch ?
Well if Aridhaman is S-3 and it's launched already, than we are working on S-4 Arighat
and on S-4* on two bearth's so after Arighat going out space will be used for S-5
Given larger size of S-5 we are hearing noise about space constrain.

I think S-3 Aridhaman is already out of SBC it's in trail or at other location awaiting reactor becoming critical.
Arighat is launched & probably we 2-3 years into S-4*
You see ATV line being Idle was concern in 2012, so we can assume the lines were never Idle.

Do share your views guys

An additional unit, the S-4* was sanctioned in 2012 when it became clear that the S-5 would take a longer development cycle and would result in the ATV line being idle.
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
So new sub is same as arihant. Little better but same fire power as arihant. All that more k4 missiles, bigger hull was just air. Well india does move like an elephant. Bigger hull only in next decade now.
Submarine is for sea denial. Why do we need ballistic missile submarine? The only place where Indian missiles don't reach is AMERICAN CONTINENT.

There is no way a nuclear first strike can take out the hardened underground bunkers

 

Flame Thrower

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
1,676
Likes
2,731
Submarine is for sea denial. Why do we need ballistic missile submarine? The only place where Indian missiles don't reach is AMERICAN CONTINENT.

There is no way a nuclear first strike can take out the hardened underground bunkers

Bhai there are 3 types of Subs

SSK, SSN and SSBN.

4th is SSGN, only Ohio class is active(SSBN convert) SSGN.

SSBN came as insurance policy during the heights of cold war. If you go through the documentary of Trident, tgen you may get the better picture. I want 70% of our nukes in SSBNs, 25% in hardened silos, trains, tels etc while 5% as aerial delivery.

SSKs and SSNs are for area denial. If the sea area is less around your country then SSKs are worst nightmare(the quietest of all) for your enemy

If the area is large and requires lot of patrol like India, then SSNs come in handy.
 

Chinmoy

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
8,661
Likes
22,504
Country flag
Submarine is for sea denial. Why do we need ballistic missile submarine? The only place where Indian missiles don't reach is AMERICAN CONTINENT.

There is no way a nuclear first strike can take out the hardened underground bunkers

Did you heard about Agni 6? Where from do you think we would be launching a 10K + Km missile from?
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
Did you heard about Agni 6? Where from do you think we would be launching a 10K + Km missile from?
Reason says that we will need to launch 1000 missiles at once. Mere 10-15 serves little purpose. Nukes are not as strong as portrayed
 

Bloom17

New Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Messages
9
Likes
8
I am trying to give some explanation
Still now we have got three names of Indian nuclear submarine
INS Arihant
INS Aridhaman &
INS Arighat
Now here as an explanation how, both Aridhaman and Arighat exists still it's third SSBN

View attachment 21948
This is S1, prototype nuclear reactor
View attachment 21949
INS Arihant...a mini SSBN but a primary SSN actually. First nuclear submarine. Possibly prototype or tech demo of our six unnamed SSN to be made.
View attachment 21950
A recent video shows this. It is neither Arihant class nor Kalvari...then it is INS Aridhaman,unless video makers did a mistake
Irrespective of video, INS Aridhaman is first SSBN actually and second nuclear Sub. First in Aridhaman class. And possibly this is actually S2 instead S3.

INS Arighat is third nucler submarine. Second in Aridhaman class and second SSBN. Thus it is S3. After that S4 snd S4* will be moved.

This explains and satisfy both the previous infos and new by Sandeep Unnithan.
Where is the second picture from?
 

Bloom17

New Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Messages
9
Likes
8
I am trying to give some explanation
Still now we have got three names of Indian nuclear submarine
INS Arihant
INS Aridhaman &
INS Arighat
Now here as an explanation how, both Aridhaman and Arighat exists still it's third SSBN

View attachment 21948
This is S1, prototype nuclear reactor
View attachment 21949
INS Arihant...a mini SSBN but a primary SSN actually. First nuclear submarine. Possibly prototype or tech demo of our six unnamed SSN to be made.
View attachment 21950
A recent video shows this. It is neither Arihant class nor Kalvari...then it is INS Aridhaman,unless video makers did a mistake
Irrespective of video, INS Aridhaman is first SSBN actually and second nuclear Sub. First in Aridhaman class. And possibly this is actually S2 instead S3.

INS Arighat is third nucler submarine. Second in Aridhaman class and second SSBN. Thus it is S3. After that S4 snd S4* will be moved.

This explains and satisfy both the previous infos and new by Sandeep Unnithan.
Where is the third pic from? Could you please provide that video link
 

no smoking

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
4,998
Likes
2,299
Country flag
Submarine is for sea denial. Why do we need ballistic missile submarine? The only place where Indian missiles don't reach is AMERICAN CONTINENT.
Because the survivability of SSBN is greater than any of land base missile including truck & train. It provides the most reliable second strike capability.

There is no way a nuclear first strike can take out the hardened underground bunkers
No,
Firstly, during the cold war, neither American, nor Russian believed that most of their missile silo couldn't survive in enemy's first strike.
Secondly, there is no need to take out those hardened underground bunkers. Those missiles will become easier targets on the way to their launch sites and launch preparation.
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
Because the survivability of SSBN is greater than any of land base missile including truck & train. It provides the most reliable second strike capability.


No,
Firstly, during the cold war, neither American, nor Russian believed that most of their missile silo couldn't survive in enemy's first strike.
Secondly, there is no need to take out those hardened underground bunkers. Those missiles will become easier targets on the way to their launch sites and launch preparation.
Today, there is TEL. No need to transport missiles. Just erect and launch.
 

lcafanboy

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
5,757
Likes
36,706
Country flag
S5: India’s Next Generation Ballistic Missile Submarine taking Shape
Published December 12, 2017 | By admin SOURCE: VISHAL KARPE / FOR MY TAKE / IDRW.ORG



INS Arighat, India’s Second Nuclear Ballistic Missile Submarine had a quiet launch away from the media limelight but India has already started groundwork to develop its next successor with the development of next-generation Ballistic Missile Submarine internally codenamed S5.

Unlike S4 and S4 * which are just an extended version of Arihant class, S5 SSBN will be a new design and will be nearly double the size of S4 SSBN when it is ready in another decade time.

S5 will have reported surface displacement of over 13500 tonnes which is about same as Triomphant class of ballistic missile submarines operated by the French Navy but still smaller then Ohio-class submarine operated by United States Navy.

According to recent media reports, India has started groundwork for the development of S5 lead ship and has started sourcing of tools and euipments required for the construction to start sometime in 2021-22 when Drydocks used for the construction of S4 and S4 * will be vacated after their launch in the 2020-22 timeframe.

If the program sticks to its schedules and doesn’t face any delays then tentatively the first lead submarine will be ready for launch by end of next decade. S5 will also require new reactor and BARC will upscale current 83MW Pressurized water reactor (PWR) from Arihant class to 190 MW to meet the power demands of the larger vessel.

K5 will be designed to carry new K6 SLBM with a range of over 6000km and in total and it will be able to carry an armament of 16 K6 SLBM plus conventional torpedoes along with New Indigenous anti-ship missiles in development.

Each S5 will have Average construction timeframe of 8 years and lead submarine S5 might take little longer time initially but India might start work on 2 Submarines at a time to reduce their developmental time.

For India to maintain 365 days Sea based Nuclear triad in place and on patrol, India will require to develop a minimum of 4 S5 Class submarine which will ensure that at least 2 S5 class Submarines are on active patrol at any time of the year with Nuclear warheads, while other two submarines are in drydocks or at the port for training or for minor repairs .

S4 and S4 * armed with K-4 and K-5 SLBM will be India’s Second line of SSBN by the time all 4 or 6 S5 Class SSBN are operational and Arihant and Arighat both will then become Operational training vessels to train future submariners to operate nuclear submarines.

Arihant and Arighat both have been cleared to operate only K-15 SBLM with a range of 1000 km and soon K-4 SLBM will become operational with a range of 3500km soon. As per experts once K4 becomes operational in both the submarines, both Arihant and Arighat would be deployed for active patrol with nuclear warheads in next two years in rotational bases.

http://idrw.org/s5-indias-next-generation-ballistic-missile-submarine-taking-shape/#more-156633 .
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

Articles

Top