I had argued earlier that attacking Iran would be harmful to Indian interests just like the ill advised war on Iraq. It would even be harmful to US and even Israeli interests in the long term. And neither will it make Iran give up its nuke program. Meir Dagan gave an interview to CBS stating pretty much the same. Article is liberally sourced so go to the actual article for more info Former Israeli spy chief talks down strike on Iran nuclear sites as 'stupidest idea' - CSMonitor.com In his first American television appearance yesterday, recently retired Israeli spy chief Meir Dagan said that Israel must consider alternatives to a military strike on Iran. His pronouncement came just days after Benjamin Netanyahuâ€™s visit to the United States, in which the Israeli prime minister worked to drum up American support for an Israeli strike on Iranâ€™s nuclear program, which Mr. Netanyahu considers an existential threat. â€œAn attack on Iran before you are exploring all other approaches is not the right way how to do it,â€ Mr. Dagan told CBS news, according to the transcript of the interview. CBS says that Dagan, who led Israel's Mossad from 2002 to 2011, â€œknows more about Iranâ€™s nuclear program than just about anyone, because it was his job to stop it.â€ The Iranians suspect that under Dagan, the Mossad was responsible for assassinations, faulty equipment, and computer viruses that set back their nuclear program, according to CBS, which will air Dagan's full interview on 60 Minutes this weekend. But on the same day as his CBS interview, Netanyahu indicated to TV reporters in Israel that an Israeli strike is still very much an option in his mind. While he prefers a diplomatic solution, he said, the time frame for an Israeli strike on Iran is â€œnot a matter of days or weeks, but also not of years,â€ Haaretz reports. â€œThe result must be a removal of the threat of nuclear weapons in Iranâ€™s heads,â€ he said. According to a separate Haaretz report, Dagan made clear in his interview that he thought there is time to pursue options other than a strike, including encouraging regime change in Iran. He also said that he trusted the Obama administration to choose the right strategy for handling Iran, even as Republican presidential candidates and legislators painted President Obama as weak for not being willing to advocate for a strike. Mr. Obama said â€œthe military option is on the table and he is not going to let Iran become a nuclear state and from my experience, I usually trust the president of the US,â€ Dagan said. (The Christian Science Monitor this week looked at why Netanyahu does not have the same trust in Obamaâ€™s strategy.) Dagan also broke ranks with Netanyahu on Iranâ€™s calculations. The prime minister has often painted Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the rest of the Iranian leadership as unpredictable, irrational actors. But in his CBS interview, Dagan said the Iranian regime is â€œa very rational regime. â€¦ maybe not exactly rational based on what I call Western thinking, but no doubt they are considering all the implications of their actions.â€ Iranâ€™s state-run PressTV highlighted this comment, headlining its story about the interview â€œDagan says Israel must not attack â€˜rationalâ€™ Iran.â€ The Monitor reports that Ayatollah Khamenei gave â€œunprecedentedâ€ praise to a US leader this week, applauding a speech by Obama earlier this week in which he tried to scale back discussion about a strike on Iran and criticized Republicans for â€œblusterâ€ and â€œbig talk.â€ â€œThis talk is good talk and shows an exit from illusion,â€ Ayatollah Khamenei told Iranâ€™s Assembly of Experts, a senior clerical body, according to a translation by Agence France-Presse. â€œBut the US president continued saying that he wants to make the Iranian people kneel through sanctions, this part of this speech shows the continuation of illusion in this issue." The Monitor also reported yesterday that according to one survey conducted in February, nearly two-thirds of Israeli Jews oppose a strike without US assistance. A second survey showed that 58 percent opposed a unilateral attack. The opposition, according to the Monitor, is not so much about whether it is right to do so, but whether the attempt would be successful â€“ and the consequences if it isnâ€™t. Reuters reports that during his US visit, Netanyahu requested â€œadvanced â€˜bunker-busterâ€™ bombs and refueling planesâ€ that would increase Israelâ€™s ability to hit Iranâ€™s underground nuclear site and its chances of success. No agreement has so far been made in response to the request.