Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings

[FRYCRY]

Why should we weep for Britain? Muslims or Christians, they're both the same from our point of view. Let them gnaw at each other's societies and destroy each other.

i dont get good vibes when muslims take over any influential country also the catch is white British population in london is 44.9%. the 12% population of muslims in london have started to take over

muslim vs christian, i rather choose the lesser evil. Jesus > mohammad (if these characters actually existed )

 

[Navnit Kundu]

i dont get good vibes when muslims take over any influential country also the catch is white British population in london is 44.9%. the 12% population of muslims in london have started to take over

muslim vs christian, i rather choose the lesser evil. Jesus > mohammad (if these characters actually existed )

British aren't stupid, they wont allow any meaningful takeover, this is no take over. Such people are usually plants by the intel agencies to pacify their domestic Muslim population by creating an outwardly appearance of inclusive governance, lest it becomes apparent to their Muslim youth that they are living as second class citizens in Britain. Such token appointments serve as a means of false hope to restive populations, as something to aspire to (same with cricket recruitment). This is part of their counter-radicalization narrative building to preempt recruiters from capitalizing on Muslim isolation. They are making the Muslims feel like they have a stake in the governance of the nation, while not giving any REAL decision making power to those people. He will sit and govern the city, he doesn't get to decide foreign policy, or get oversight of intel agencies, or defense procurement or anything like that. Plumbing, roads, that is what he will do, while serving as a token 'Muslim politician'. In reality, the majority of Muslims will continue to remain in neglected ghettos while erroneously feeling that they are represented in every sphere of life, and can get there some day, if only they worked hard, like the Muslim politicians and cricketers they see on TV, who have made it big in Britain. It's done to take away their despair and give them false hope to keep them pacified.

As a country which was able to grasp the complexity of India and divide and rule for 200 years, it really isn't that difficult for Britain to manage a few Muslims in their own country by planting patriotic British Muslims who quack all the right noises to position themselves as a 'true Muslim' but have been thoroughly vetted and handled by their intel agencies. They will keep the Muslims divided to keep them from gaining any real power. The man is Muslim only in appearance, but British in his thinking (like Nehru), so the gullible followers end up accepting him as their own. This helps the intel agencies establish and extend his legitimacy. This has great propaganda value but in reality it's a British man roaming in Muslim fancy dress, if you may.

muslim vs christian, i rather choose the lesser evil. Jesus > mohammad

Christians are no less evil, in fact, they are far more treacherous than Muslims, it's just that their modus operandi is slick and their propaganda is polished, so we end up believing they are some sort of fluffy bunnies who could do no harm.

 

[Navnit Kundu]

Anyway, it's good to see Britishers showing their tolerance :

Remind them of this next time any Britisher or coolie on this forum accuses India of intolerance.

 

[OrangeFlorian]

Nine-year-old boy raped allegedly by relative in Peshawar
boys also get raped in porkland, neo, zarvani, zulfimadam please tell us abot ur experience

British aren't stupid, they wont allow any meaningful takeover, this is no take over. Such people are usually plants by the intel agencies to pacify their domestic Muslim population by creating an outwardly appearance of inclusive governance, lest it becomes apparent to their Muslim youth that they are living as second class citizens in Britain. Such token appointments serve as a means of false hope to restive populations, as something to aspire to (same with cricket recruitment). This is part of their counter-radicalization narrative building to preempt recruiters from capitalizing on Muslim isolation. They are making the Muslims feel like they have a stake in the governance of the nation, while not giving any REAL decision making power to those people. He will sit and govern the city, he doesn't get to decide foreign policy, or get oversight of intel agencies, or defense procurement or anything like that. Plumbing, roads, that is what he will do, while serving as a token 'Muslim politician'. In reality, the majority of Muslims will continue to remain in neglected ghettos while erroneously feeling that they are represented in every sphere of life, and can get there some day, if only they worked hard, like the Muslim politicians and cricketers they see on TV, who have made it big in Britain. It's done to take away their despair and give them false hope to keep them pacified.

As a country which was able to grasp the complexity of India and divide and rule for 200 years, it really isn't that difficult for Britain to manage a few Muslims in their own country by planting patriotic British Muslims who quack all the right noises to position themselves as a 'true Muslim' but have been thoroughly vetted and handled by their intel agencies. They will keep the Muslims divided to keep them from gaining any real power. The man is Muslim only in appearance, but British in his thinking (like Nehru), so the gullible followers end up accepting him as their own. This helps the intel agencies establish and extend his legitimacy. This has great propaganda value but in reality it's a British man roaming in Muslim fancy dress, if you may.



Christians are no less evil, in fact, they are far more treacherous than Muslims, it's just that their modus operandi is slick and their propaganda is polished, so we end up believing they are some sort of fluffy bunnies who could do no harm.

......................................................

 

[adrenalin]

ISI 'poisoned' CIA ex-official in Pakistan
porki servant poison master

 

[Indx TechStyle]

US asks Pakistan to stop militants from using its soil
THE NEWSPAPER'S CORRESPONDENT— PUBLISHED ABOUT 2 HOURS AGO

WASHINGTON: The US State Department has urged Pakistan to take military action against Taliban leaders who allegedly used its territory for cross-border attacks, besides continuing to encourage them to resume peace talks with Kabul.

Adviser to Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz told reporters in Islamabad earlier this week that Pakistan could not accept the Afghan demand to abandon its peace efforts and take immediate military action against the Taliban leaders. Instead, Mr Aziz offered to push for resuming the reconciliation talks as soon as possible.

When asked for comments on the Pakistani position, a State Department official reminded Islamabad that in December last year Afghanistan and Pakistan signed a joint statement, agreeing, “not to allow use of their respective soil against each other”.

The official noted that Afghanistan and Pakistan had also agreed to “sternly handle any elements crossing over and getting involved in violence on either side, through active intelligence sharing and intelligence-based operations”.

Last month, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani urged Pakistan to evict Taliban insurgents through military action or arrest and hand them over to Kabul for trial and punishment for killing innocent Afghans. President Ghani also said that he would no longer seek Pakistan’s help in arranging reconciliation talks with the Taliban.

But Mr Aziz said on Tuesday that the Afghan outrage at Pakistan was “an expression of frustration” at the delay in reconciliation talks. He said it was unfortunate the Taliban had gone ahead with their Spring Offensive, pushing aside Islamabad’s efforts for re-starting the talks.

But the State Department official reminded Mr Aziz and other Pakistani officials that Pakistan had made a commitment to Afghanistan and other partners not to allow the militants to use its territory.

“This is the commitment that Pakistan has made to its partners, and we expect it to take steps necessary to promote dialogue, reduce violence in Afghanistan, and encourage the Taliban to engage in meaningful negotiations,” the official said.

When reminded that Mr Aziz clearly signalled they would not take military action against these Taliban leaders, the US official noted that Pakistanis’ commitment to support a reconciliation process was clearly stated through the Quadrilateral Coordination Group as well, which includes Afghanistan, China, Pakistan and the United States.

“That is the basis and expectation on which we will continue to engage Pakistan,” he said.

The US official pointed out that at a recent congressional hearing, the United States underlined the need for an effective engagement with Pakistan as critical for promoting peace and stability in the region.

Asked what was the US policy regarding Pakistan’s support for the Haqqani Network and other Afghan Taliban groups allegedly operating from the Pakistani soil, the official said: “We have consistently expressed our concerns at the highest levels of the government of Pakistan about their continued tolerance for Afghan Taliban groups, such as the Haqqani Network operating from Pakistani soil. We did so again following the devastating suicide attack on April 19 in Kabul.”

He said the US administration had “pressed” the Pakistani government to follow up on its commitment not to discriminate among terrorist groups, regardless of their agenda or affiliation, by undertaking concrete action against the Haqqanis.

Published in Dawn, May 7th, 2016

 

[Indx TechStyle]

Bro, I like your Sarcastic tone. Probably China/?? is going to fund it

It isn't sarcasm buddy. I was really surprised by word buy.

Celebrations in pakistan as paki origin commie muslim sadiq khan has become new mayor of london. The sad part is that Great Britain was a country the world looked up at as a proud nation that used to be in charge of its borders and political destiny.

View attachment 8514

On paki newspapers:
"London gets it's first Muslim mayor."
You want other some examples?

1. Best Muslim space program.
2. Muslim nuclear power.
3. Muslim Economy
4. Most powerful Muslim military
5. Muslim country with best technology

Islamic power, Islamic bombs, Islamic technology, Islamic military.
They count who's Islamically powerful or powerful among Muslims. That's why they could not become even regional power in history. :biggrin2:

 

[for truth]

This has great propaganda value but in reality it's a British man roaming in Muslim fancy dress, if you may.

The Muslim mayor will not limit himself to being just the mayor, he will have his eyes set for more power.
This is where things will start to make a difference. The powers within military, corporate houses and even the power structures that are created within universities by international collaborations within Europe and North American institutions will mean that the future of UK is secure being with the West --militarily, financially and scientifically.

Anyone who wants to be leader of UK, will ultimately have to serve these power circles, whether Muslim or christian or Sikh or Hindu. Brown, black or white. All the powers act behind the screens pulling the strings. In-fact, I would say UK is becoming more pro-china than more pro-native Muslim population. If they don't serve these power circles, the "Great" word will remain just as an adjective in "Great Britain" and very soon the country will go downhill.

while the native Muslim populations will look to this man as a role model, this Muslim mayor will have to serve the power circles that have been established over centuries through alliances and that have survived even through world wars. Various surveys have shown the existing deep divisions between Muslim communities and majority population in UK. There is a growing pattern of radicalization within Muslim communities, while also a growing pattern to defend and justify this radicalization by playing the victim card.


Months later, the Muslim communities will feel they have been ignored and will start to resent having voted for this man, they will come to conclusion that a white skinned dude is better than a brown skinned dude from a third world country background. After all, the Muslims from third world countries migrated to UK because of the very reason that they are better served under the white skinned than brown skinned folks.There will always be a wide gap between what the Muslim community expects from this man, and what he will end up doing. With passing of time, the Muslim mayor will be resented from within Muslim communities--for reasons such as "he is pro west propaganda", " he is not Muslim enough", "he is a Zionist" etc etc. Just the same way the Indian origin professors in western universities generally tend to be judgmentally harsher on Indian Students than white skinned students, this will be the fate of people from third world countries.....we hate our own more than we hate those who enslaved us.

 

[Navnit Kundu]

The Muslim mayor will not limit himself to being just the mayor, he will have his eyes set for more power.

Check his voting patterns for parliamentary bills, he has openly come out in support of gay rights and has not branded himself as a typical Islamist intellectual.

Months later, the Muslim communities will feel they have been ignored and will start to resent having voted for this man, they will come to conclusion that a white skinned dude is better than a brown skinned dude from a third world country background.

Muslims are very shrewd and pragmatic in that regard, true. They'd much rather vote for a subversive commie who espouses the Islamist cause then a bearded Islamist who is reconciliation. Muslims know their collective interests very well, that is how the Islamist lobby has survived for so long.

After all, the Muslims from third world countries migrated to UK because of the very reason that they are better served under the white skinned than brown skinned folks.

Not true. Muslims are very arrogant about their identity and swear by its supremacy. They might have migrated for better economic prospects, but they never look forward to being ruled by others. Their temporary submissiveness is merely Taquiyya, which is a function of their understanding that they currently lack the critical mass to win great battles. As their number grow, and they become confident of more electoral victories, they will start becoming more assertive, under one excuse or the other.

Just the same way the Indian origin professors in western universities generally tend to be judgmentally harsher on Indian Students than white skinned students, this will be the fate of people from third world countries.....we hate our own more than we hate those who enslaved us.

That's true, the biggest enemies of Indians on foreign land are other Indians, but that has got less to do with foreign brainwashing or their credentials, it's the indigenous hate that we carry from India to wherever we go, which is playing out. For example if an arrogant Bengali 'intellectual' encounters non-Bengali Indians, he is bound to be hostile to them, regardless of which country he is in, or what post he is serving. This is one aspect we really can't blame the foreigners for. They might have sown the seeds for divide and rule but if this supremacy complex exists in certain communities even after 7 decades of independence, believe me, it is only because it has been kept alive purely voluntarily.

 

[Navnit Kundu]

It isn't sarcasm buddy. I was really surprised by word buy.

On paki newspapers:
"London gets it's first Muslim mayor."
You want other some examples?

1. Best Muslim space program.
2. Muslim nuclear power.
3. Muslim Economy
4. Most powerful Muslim military
5. Muslim country with best technology

Islamic power, Islamic bombs, Islamic technology, Islamic military.
They count who's Islamically powerful or powerful among Muslims. That's why they could not become even regional power in history. :biggrin2:

This is a story after possibly Modi came to power or during 2013, I don't exactly remember but it happened. India had offered electricity to Pakistan (in exchange for connectivity to Afghanistan), and Pakistan had rejected it saying "we don't want Hindu electricity".

 

[Blackwater]

Celebrations in pakistan as paki origin commie muslim sadiq khan has become new mayor of london. The sad part is that Great Britain was a country the world looked up at as a proud nation that used to be in charge of its borders and political destiny.

View attachment 8514

it clearly shows how mullah population lives i London that he got clear majority.

Islamic strategy working great now to produce more more kids to increase the population

today London got Muslim mayor tom UK wil get Muslim prime minister

god save UK

 

[for truth]

Check his voting patterns for parliamentary bills, he has openly come out in support of gay rights and has not branded himself as a typical Islamist intellectual.

Couldn't understand why u made this point.

They might have migrated for better economic prospects, but they never look forward to being ruled by others. Their temporary submissiveness is merely Taquiyya, which is a function of their understanding that they currently lack the critical mass to win great battles. As their number grow, and they become confident of more electoral victories, they will start becoming more assertive, under one excuse or the other.

Part of the reason for their migration might have been economic prospects, but it wasn't the sole reason. At the end of the day, there are millions of Muslims who yearn for freedom, liberty and value for human life. The generations of Pakistanis who migrated to UK, will always talk about how their children are able to walk to school without the fear of being blown up, and this safety factor supersedes the economic factor. Among the list of places the Muslims would like to migrate, even if Saudi Arabia promises to pay salaries like in west, the list will always be dominated by New york, Paris, London.....I was more pointing to the fact that whoever they elect, the more distinct identity they try to seek through their assertiveness, the more fucked up they will find themselves in. Pakistan stands as a lesson to be learnt here. And then, they will start again looking for greener pastures..

That's true, the biggest enemies of Indians on foreign land are other Indians, but that has got less to do with foreign brainwashing or their credentials, it's the indigenous hate that we carry from India to wherever we go, which is playing out.

That's what I said when I meant people from third world countries. It wasn't any foreign inculcated, it is something we carry within our-self.

Muslims know their collective interests very well, that is how the Islamist lobby has survived for so long.

Could you explain your understanding on this Islamist lobby?

My understanding is that they are incoherent and lack substance. Few days back, I read a comment of an Italian girl blasting Nobel prize winner malala who said that speaking negative things about Muslims will push them towards terrorism. Increasingly, I have noticed prevalence of negative opinions for malala even in west. Tarek fatah just a few days ago blasted Indian Islamist haroon siddiqui on Canadian media for saying that Canadian media was isolating Muslims. From my understanding, Islamist lobby isn't effective, and their increasing assertiveness is only increasing the opposition from the other side. They haven't met any scale of widely accepted success(if any) to their quests.

 

[Anikastha]

Buy?


Please enter a message with at least 30 characters.

Must be printing mistake..Don't worry I will sue them at ICJ.

 

[adrenalin]

it clearly shows how mullah population lives i London that he got clear majority.

Islamic strategy working great now to produce more more kids to increase the population

today London got Muslim mayor tom UK wil get Muslim prime minister

god save UK

hindu family in UK should have 6 children to overcome the muslim subjugation through rat like breeding. this is only solution. sikh like you should start sharping your swords.

 

[FRYCRY]

@Navnit Kundu @Blackwater @Indx TechStyle
Lagta hai sadik jee RAA agent nikley.....

 

[Screambowl]

@Navnit Kundu @Blackwater @Indx TechStyle
Lagta hai sadik jee RAA agent nikley.....
View attachment 8516


View attachment 8517

View attachment 8518

this will make the porkis fart in their pants ......................... keep these photos marked. some 1 please post it in defence pakku ..

 

[Navnit Kundu]

Couldn't understand why u made this point.

Because you said that he is a Muslim mayor who will try to grab more power. I just wanted to let you know that he is a Muslim but not an Islamist. He goes to temples, supports gay rights etc, his core belief system is that of a typical liberal, and 'Muslim' happens to be his incidental identity.

Could you explain your understanding on this Islamist lobby?

My understanding is that they are incoherent and lack substance.

They don't have to have substance, it's a game of numbers. As long as their tribe grows and as long as you believe in the same fairy tale as I do, we are both in the same team, that is their logic. Once that groupism sets in, then everything else works out. On an organizational level, it is based on a feudal system which thrives on numbers. On a personal level it's based on : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compartmentalization_(psychology)

 

[for truth]

Because you said that he is a Muslim mayor who will try to grab more power. I just wanted to let you know that he is a Muslim but not an Islamist. He goes to temples, supports gay rights etc, his core belief system is that of a typical liberal, and 'Muslim' happens to be his incidental identity.Could you explain your understanding on this Islamist lobby?

Pardon me if I failed to make myself clear.I was referring to the big picture. I never thought of him as an Islamist, and when I said he will eye for more power, I meant that one day he might try to become PM of UK.

And if he really want's to be PM of UK, he will have to serve the established power structures and do certain things which the Muslim community who voted for him may not endorse.

 

[Navnit Kundu]

Pardon me if I failed to make myself clear.I was referring to the big picture. I never thought of him as an Islamist, and when I said he will eye for more power, I meant that one day he might try to become PM of UK.

And if he really want's to be PM of UK, he will have to serve the established power structures and do certain things which the Muslim community who voted for him may not endorse.

Seems like I misread you; My bad.

Here's what I feel about the larger picture of Islamism and where its going.

If we compare Islam with other spiritual belief systems like Hinduism, Buddhism or even Christianity, we are actually putting it in the wrong category. Islam is full fledged a political ideology which deals with every aspect from how an individual should behave to how a nation should be governed, it has prescription for domestic laws (sharia) and a template for an economic system (interest free banking), and how international relations should be handled (dawah, taquiya, jihad/ conquest) so it has a social, economic and international angle to it. In that sense Islamism is more analogous to Marxism, Maoism, Socialism, Capitalism instead of spiritual philosophies like Hinduism and Buddhism. That is its correct categorization. Because when someone says they are a believer in Islam, they aren't just saying that they use its spiritual teachings as a guiding light to live their life, they are asserting that they believe in a certain revisionist, expansionist political doctrine.

 

[for truth]

Apparently, Sadiq khan's father was born in India, and sadiq Khan a thoroughly born and brought up British.

Why are Pakistanis celebrating anyway?