pmaitra
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33,262
- Likes
- 19,594
I'll give you two simple examples:I seriously don't understand that how a person like Lalu (who couldn't run his state properly) could turn around Railways with minimal fire hike, a feat that Mamata or any other minister were unable to achieve.
- The Railways used to procure wagons that were made of thick sheets of steel, so that, for e.g., when parked next to a quarry, if 25 kg blocks of rocks were dropped from a height of 10 metres, it would not dent the steel. Laloo recommended thinner steel, so in the short run, costs were minimized, but in the long run, we will need frequent scrapping of old rolling stock and frequent acquisition of new rolling stock.
- Wagons, carriages and bogies have their own weight ratings, and there is always a tolerance kept (I think 20%, not sure). Laloo reduced that tolerance, thus hauling more goods, little realizing that also resulted in more wear and tear, and thus more damage to tracks, wheels, axles, and therefore, demanding more maintenance.
Fares need to be hiked. Eight years is too much for fares to stagnate when people's incomes have risen and inflation has also increased. True, money has to be spent in the right places, but then, you also need to have money to spend.The problem is not with fare hike but with the expenditure. The money has to be spent in the right places.
True.The anti train collision system is being discussed for the past 5 or so years however never implemented, if it would have been implemented then accident like these could be avoided, which 99 % of the time happen due to human error.
All I can say is that, Indian train fares are cheap, and Indian passengers' lives are also cheap, very cheap. Each life is worth Rs. 500,000 (see opening post).