Did Nehru reject Baloch ruler’s accession request?

Discussion in 'Balochistan - Freedom Struggle' started by Free Karma, Mar 28, 2015.

  1. Free Karma

    Free Karma Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2013
    Messages:
    2,372
    Likes Received:
    2,576
    Location:
    Chennai
    Did Nehru reject Baloch ruler’s accession request?

     
    Lions Of Punjab and Razor like this.
  2.  
  3. anoop_mig25

    anoop_mig25 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,195
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    Blackwater likes this.
  4. roma

    roma NRI in Europe Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,248
    Likes Received:
    1,863
    this is yet another example of the total lack of strategic thinking of our first batch of
    leaders ......... even today that is still our main problem or should we say opportunity ?

    no country had prefect leadership but "our" Nehru sure takes the cake !!
     
    smestarz and bose like this.
  5. warriorextreme

    warriorextreme Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,369
    Likes Received:
    536
    Location:
    Mumbai
    If its true then I must say that it was a good decision...We could not have managed to support a territory that was not connected directly to mainland and having an enemy territory in between....also what happened in that region in the past & what is happening currently would have drawn us into unimaginable conflicts...a good subject for alternate history enthusiasts may be?
     
    DingDong likes this.
  6. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    4,508
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    Isn't the NE connected to India by land that is barely 100km wide?
    Also BD was part of pak so essentially NE was surrounded by enemy territory and even now BD isn't trust-worthy.

    Add to that the Chinese are pretty close by (thrust from tri-junction of Bhutan-India-China) and cut-off access to NE.
    And finally there is no sea access to NE.

    Balocistan probably wouldn't have been part of India but a separate state maybe.
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2015
  7. tarunraju

    tarunraju Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2009
    Messages:
    5,317
    Likes Received:
    3,891
    Location:
    Hyderabad
    That 100 km width is sufficient for us to pass 6-lane highways, twin-electrified broad-gauge railway lines, electric pylons that connect NE to the national grid, fiber-optic cables, gas pipelines, and the convenience of not having to set foot on foreign soil/airspace to get to NE.

    But unlike the East-West Pakistan situation, where Pakis had to pole-vault India by air or sail around the peninsula, holding Balochistan would have been easy for India. We could have sailed across from Gujarat coast to Balochistan in lower time than going over land, and our Navy would have secured a shipping route that would have choked Pakistan.

    The reason I think Nehru declined Balochi request is because he had by then probably agreed that Balochistan would be Pakistan, to the British.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2015
    Razor likes this.
  8. Blackwater

    Blackwater Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    21,000
    Likes Received:
    11,837
    Location:
    Akhand Bharat
    true if balouchi joined India it will have same fate as Bangladesh
     
  9. Simple_Guy

    Simple_Guy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    533
    Location:
    Delhi
    Pakistan had no land link with Junagadh and Hyderabad and yet they intervened.

    We could have accepted Kalat's accession just to have leverage over Pakis.

    India does not have a land link with Lakshadweep or Andaman Nicobar Islands.
     
  10. Simple_Guy

    Simple_Guy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    533
    Location:
    Delhi
    Talking about land link, both Amarkot and Khairpur in Sindh, had a land link with Rajasthan, but Nehru did nothing to get them.

    http://www.lightforcenetwork.com/indus-my-home-deepak-ramchandani.pdf
     
  11. anoop_mig25

    anoop_mig25 Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    5,195
    Likes Received:
    2,223
    And what could pak do in both the cases ??????? sit silently and saw the action on ground :rofl:


    about Lakshadweep pak navy visited their to claim as at time there was muslim population there but then indain navy had allready docked there ship and prevented any claim by paks
     
  12. mayfair

    mayfair Elite Member Elite Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Messages:
    2,585
    Likes Received:
    1,762
    Location:
    India
    The point is that unlike a vast 1000 mile distance between West and East Pakistan, the land and sea distances are much lesser between Western India and Balochistan.

    Any move towards Indian balochistan would swiftly see Indian armed forces moving swiftly to threaten Karachi (which was then the capital of Pakistan) and Lahore. It would also have provided solid leverage for India to force the Pakis to pull back from Kashmir in 1948.

    Just imagine, having the ability to cutoff Paki access to coast with SWIFT, simple, coordinated maneuvres from East and West. Pakjab would be a landlocked country in no time.
     
    Razor likes this.
  13. Simple_Guy

    Simple_Guy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2013
    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    533
    Location:
    Delhi
    caused delay, bloodshed (mostly Hindu), and both military and monetary costs. Junagadh Nawab fled with most of the state treasures, legitimately belonging to India and worth thousands of crores in todays money. Hyderabad lavished crores in aid to pakis, all state treasures belonging to the people.

    What about Amarkot and Khairpur?
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2015
  14. smestarz

    smestarz Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2012
    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    568
    Location:
    India
    He made it and his family is still eating it
     
  15. Ray

    Ray The Chairman Defence Professionals Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2009
    Messages:
    43,117
    Likes Received:
    23,545
    Location:
    Somewhere
    Even Khan Abdul Gaffar Khan did not want to join Pakistan and wanted to be with India.

    Now check this map

    [​IMG]

    Could they not be like East Pakistan where India was coming in between?

    There would have been no Kashmir issue either, since the NWFP tribal were mustered to assist Pak Army to attack K.ashmir.

    Nehru has no vision and he was to enamoured in himself!

    Narcissist.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2015
    roma likes this.
  16. Sambha ka Boss

    Sambha ka Boss Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2014
    Messages:
    701
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    Hyderabad Rangareddy
    Acceding Kalat with India was not a good idea.
     
  17. Sambha ka Boss

    Sambha ka Boss Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2014
    Messages:
    701
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    Hyderabad Rangareddy
    Balochs are Iranian people, they don't think themselves culturally/racially connected even to Punjabi-Sindhi Muslims of Pakistan. It was good, not to accede it to India.
     

Share This Page