OBOR News & Developments

[republic_roi97]

Hardly allies.But if Japan invests in Chabahar then we can talk about such an axis.

I am just quoting forbes POV here bro.
But I do think that Japan and India would make a better pair than Japan and US do.

 

[AmoghaVarsha]

I am just quoting forbes POV here bro.
But I do think that Japan and India would make a better pair than Japan and US do.

Without US Japan doesnt have the military muscle.If Japan had the military muscle then India-Japan againist Pak-China would have been a very interesting tussle.

 

[republic_roi97]

Let's play. This is my domestic Internet connection tested on servers around the world:

















#DigitalIndia

Internet is your hard disk. That holyspeed shows that to us.

 

[republic_roi97]

Without US Japan doesnt have the military muscle.If Japan had the military muscle then India-Japan againist Pak-China would have been a very interesting tussle.

That is exactly what I mean, you see, China is interfering in Japan too, hence, Japan need to get out of this US bondage and start growing its military muscle somehow. And if it allies with us, they can utilize our man power and space for defence project and at the same time, India would benefit with Japan's technical know how and advancements.

 

[3deffect]

Let's play. This is my domestic Internet connection tested on servers around the world:

















#DigitalIndia

its my speed well as i told you i got good broadband

 

[3deffect]

CHINA SHOULD EITHER MAKE PEACE WITH INDIA OR FORGET ABOUT CPEC

by Panos Mourdoukoutas
China desperately needs the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). It’s part of that nation’s vision to write the rules of the next stage of globalization and help its export and investment engines grow for years to come—a good prospect for investors in Chinese equities, which have been lagging behind of those of neighboring India.

Specifically, CPEC is the express link between Western China, the Middle East, and Africa–China’s second continent. Ideologically that is, which can explain why Beijing has committed $46 billion to the project.
The trouble is that CPEC passes through Pakistani regions claimed by India. That makes it a bumpy road, to say the least — Pakistan and India continue to fight for control of these regions.
That’s why China needs to make peace with India.
So far, China has done very little to appease India. In fact, it has done quite the opposite: repeatedly blocking India’s efforts to join the Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG).
And it has sided openly with Pakistan in the India-Pakistan Kashmir standoff, as evidenced by statements by China’s senior officials on the sidelines of the ongoing 71st session of United Nations General Assembly in New York.
That can explain why India’s has sided with the US in the South China Sea disputes, as previously discussed here.

 

[Butter Chicken]

here's mine....................

 

[3deffect]

BEIJING CANNOT IGNORE INDIAN CONCERNS NOW

Image Courtesy: CatchNews
In the brouhaha created by Trump’s victory and Modi’s coup against black money, what the media missed was Xi Jinping’s Special Envoy Meng’s visit to India, wherein New Delhi conveyed an important message to Beijing
In the brouhaha created by the election of Donald Trump as President of the US and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s grand master coup against black money, an event of great international importance was missed by the Indian Press. Meng Jianzhu, Secretary of the Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission of the Communist Party of China (CPC) visited Delhi and met Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Rajnath Singh.
Meng is not an ordinary official; he is a member of the CPC’s all-powerful Politburo. He replaced the disgraced Zhou Yongkang, the biggest tiger to fall in President Xi Jinping’s net in the latter’s fight against corruption and as such responsible for the ‘security’ and intelligence in the Middle Kingdom.
What was Meng here for? Probably two things: Beijing was nervous about Modi’s visit to Japan (two days later), and the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is not progressing as smoothly as envisaged (though a first Trade Convoy reached the port of Gwadar on November 12). India had a message to convey too: The nation is tired of ‘Made in Pakistan’ terrorism. In these circumstances, can India and China find an understanding?
After Modi’s meeting with Meng, a Press release from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) asserted: “The Prime Minister welcomed the intensive exchange of high-level visits between India and China over the last two years.” Nothing new or special in this!
Though Modi ‘fondly’ recalled his visit to China in May 2015, as well as his trip to Hangzhou in September 2016, to attend the G-20 summit, the PMO communiqué remained vague: “The two leaders discussed issues of mutual interest, including bilateral counter-terrorism cooperation.” The Prime Minister pointed out that “terrorism poses the gravest threat to international peace and security, and welcomed increased cooperation between India and China on counter-terrorism related matters.”
Before Meng Jianzhu’s arrival, the Indian establishment was caught in ‘a piquant protocol situation’: strictly speaking, Meng has no ‘counterpart’ in the Indian Government. Meng is said to be far senior to the Chinese Home Minister and in a way to India’s National Security Advisor. The Government finally opted for a meeting with Singh, the number two in the Indian Cabinet.
During his encounter with Meng, Singh appealed to Beijing “to support the international community’s efforts to designate Masood Azhar, the leader of the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), as a terrorist under the UN Resolution 1267.”
Singh reminded his interlocutor that Pakistan was patronising and financing terrorist groups, including Masood Azhar, Lashkar-e-Tayeeba and Hizbul Mujahideen. Their leaders still roam around freely in Pakistan; Meng was probably shown proofs.
Singh also argued that there is no good or bad terrorist: Terrorism can’t be one country’s problem alone, it is a threat to global peace and security. It had to be dealt globally…by China too!
The Home Minister mentioned the case of the ULFA leader Paresh Barua as well as the arrest of a Pakistani national in Guangzhou with fake Indian currency; Meng was asked to “clamp down on Pakistan’s nefarious designs to smuggle fake Indian currency into India through China.”
The Minister suggested that India and China should soon conclude negotiations on a bilateral Agreement on Security Cooperation; it would include tackling transnational and cyber crimes. Meng’s reactions are not known, though he is sure to have complained about the Dalai Lama’s forthcoming visit to Tawang and the ‘splittist’ activities of the Tibetan refugees in India.
We don’t know if the China Pakistan Economic Corridor, passing through Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir (PoK) and if the recent developments on the border in Ladakh were discussed. Incidentally, a couple of days before Meng’s arrival, the Indian Army and the ITBP showed for the first time a great firmness when some PLA troops tried to stop an irrigation project in Demchok, a border village on the Indus river.
Meng who was announced as Xi’s Special Envoy, had not come to Delhi just to hear a lecture from the Home Minister or the Prime Minister. Especially as the meetings took place just before Modi left for Japan for a crucial visit (to sign a civil nuclear deal), Meng is bound to have aired Beijing’s concerns.
Can India and China collaborate in the field of counter-terrorism? At the end of September, a ‘dialogue’ had already started in Beijing where a meeting, jointly chaired by Wang Yongqing, the Secretary General of the Commission for Political and Legal Affairs and RN Ravi, chairman of India’s Joint Intelligence Committee, took place. At that time, India and China agreed to work together ‘on counter-terrorism and security’.
The Global Times reported: “The two sides …reached consensus on measures to strengthen cooperation and to jointly deal with security threats.”
In Beijing, Ravi also met Meng Jianzhu who told him that “terrorism is a common enemy of the global community.” Meng asserted that “strengthened counter-terrorism cooperation between China and India is conducive to the interests of the people of both countries.”
According to The Global Times, Meng voiced the hope that the two sides could start some counter-terrorism collaboration in order to protect regional security. Where is Pakistan in this new ‘dialogue’?
Was it a coincidence, but as Meng arrived in Delhi, India and China were holding their 8th meeting of China-India Defence and Security Consultation. China was represented by a PLA rising star, Sun Jianguo, Deputy Chief of the Joint Staff Department (and informal head of China’s intelligence and military diplomacy).
Sun made the routine declaration “both countries have maintained frequent exchanges of visits and reached consensus on the development of bilateral ties in recent years.” He added: “The Chinese military is willing to join hands with India Army to maintain the exchanges on border defence, improve the mechanism of communication and strengthen border management and control so as to safeguard peace and stability in their border areas.”
Kumar was not very explicit too, “exchanges of visits and interactions between Chinese and Indian leaders have promoted the India-China strategic partnership of cooperation, which has also contributed to the common prosperity of the two countries as well as the world peace and development.”
Though little transpired during these two important visits (especially Meng’s), the future of the CPEC and its all-weather friend must have received a lot of attention. For mega projects such as the CPEC, China certainly can’t ignore India which has its own stakes in PoK. India’s closer relations with Japan and the new US President are bound to have come up too during the talks.
Asia seems in a flux, with new realignments in the offing; this makes China nervous. The time has come for Beijing to take into account Delhi’s security concerns.

 

[3deffect]

here's mine....................

View attachment 11682

you get good upload speed better then mine

 

[tarunraju]

Internet is your hard disk. That holyspeed shows that to us.

Nope, I'd be happy to make a video to prove my speed. Also HDDs work at 70-150 MB (byte) per second. My connection is 150-375 Mbps (megabit per second). In Mbyte/s it's between 18-40 MByte/s. A 700 MB file is downloaded in 20 seconds. YouTube 4K works.


But in a manner of speaking, you're right. Most of my files are on secure cloud and work just as fast as if they were locally stored.

 

[3deffect]

Nope, I'd be happy to make a video to prove my speed. Also HDDs work at 70-150 MB (byte) per second. My connection is 150-375 Mbps (megabit per second). In Mbyte/s it's between 18-40 MByte/s. A 700 MB file is downloaded in 20 seconds. YouTube 4K works.


But in a manner of speaking, you're right. Most of my files are on secure cloud and work just as fast as if they were locally stored.

which ISP you have? will you send the link i know its genuine speed but i want to see your ISP tarrif plans.

 

[tarunraju]

which ISP you have? will you send the link i know its genuine speed but i want to see your ISP tarrif plans.

I pay Rs 3,999 /month. 500 GB FUP limit. It's a South Indian ISP with service in all the IT cities of the south.

http://www.actcorp.in/

 

[republic_roi97]

Nope, I'd be happy to make a video to prove my speed. Also HDDs work at 70-150 MB (byte) per second. My connection is 150-375 Mbps (megabit per second). In Mbyte/s it's between 18-40 MByte/s. A 700 MB file is downloaded in 20 seconds. YouTube 4K works.


But in a manner of speaking, you're right. Most of my files are on secure cloud and work just as fast as if they were locally stored.

I never doubted that your internet speed is not what you've shown.
I just said that your internet speed is so fast that it would be practically faster than data tranfer onto USB 2.0 External HDD or a Pen Drive.
"Internet is your HDD" that's an idiom.

 

[3deffect]

I pay Rs 3,999 /month. 500 GB FUP limit. It's a South Indian ISP with service in all the IT cities of the south.

http://www.actcorp.in/

cool well in my case its unlimited i got 20mbps till 100gb then 2mbps unlimited in RS -1150 only

 

[Zulfiqar Khan]

A nice documentary on the CPEC.

 

[sorcerer]

Kashmir Dispute 'Hinders' $46 Billion China-Pakistan Corridor: Chinese Media
"The dispute over Kashmir between India and Pakistan does hinder China's efforts in pushing the (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor) forward," said the article in the Global Times - part of the People's Daily group of the ruling Communist Party of China.

Admitting perhaps for the first time that Kashmir dispute "does hinder" the US $46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor project, a state media report on Friday said that this does not mean China should "appease" India to prevent it from playing "little tricks".

MEANING despite both the nation's spies(NSA and chinese agency) Meeting for a dialogue in India china is rolling back on the commitment on banning JeM chief, their spy chief gave to Indian NSA.so there we go..chinese have spoken that they will support JeM on Kashmir


"The dispute over Kashmir between India and Pakistan does hinder China's efforts in pushing the (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor) forward, but this does not mean China should 'appease India' to prevent the country from playing little tricks," said the article in the Global Times - part of the People's Daily group of the ruling Communist Party of China.

It said "India should be aware that its ambition of becoming a great power won't be realised if it contributes little to promoting regional integration and regional economic development."

(Says china who has problems in SCS with peaceful growth)

The article was in response to a piece by US-based analyst Panos Mourdoukoutas in Forbes magazine yesterday criticising Beijing over the ambitious project. The Forbes piece has said that China has done "very little to appease India." The daily has regularly carried articles critical to India for the past few months. Today's was, however, a rare admission that the Kashmir dispute hinders the CPEC project, which runs through the Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
India has expressed reservations over the project that links western China to Gwadar Port in the restive Balochistan province in southern Pakistan. The project gives China easy access for trade to Central Asian states and European markets.

China has defended the project, saying it is a commercial project aimed at improving people's lives.
In the Forbes piece, Mourdoukoutas said that "China should make peace with India for forget about the project".
He said China desperately needs CPEC. It's part of China's vision "to write the rules of the next stage of globalisation" and help its export and investment engines grow for years.
"So far, China has done very little to appease India. In fact, it has done quite the opposite: repeatedly blocking India's efforts to join the Nuclear Suppliers Group," he said.
"And things could turn worse, if pro-Indian forces in Pakistan sabotage China's CPEC route. That raises the possibility of an open confrontation between China and Pakistan on the one side, and India and its allies on the other," he said.


Countering Mourdoukoutas, the Chinese media article said, "India's strategic suspicions toward China's rising presence in South Asia may hobble its ambition to be a great power, even though some observers think otherwise." The CPEC "does not target India, and we believe that China's efforts to improve infrastructure in Pakistan have no intention of supporting the country's dispute with India," it said.

It said China has made efforts to boost regional economic integration with Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Myanmar.
"However, as a strategic location connecting East Asia, Southeast Asia and Central Asia, India's poor infrastructure is a challenge for Asian nations to become interconnected.

Although China has offered an olive branch to India to help upgrade its infrastructure facilities, it seems that India is reluctant to participate in the initiative. Additionally, New Delhi's suspicions toward China have left the country vigilant as Beijing strengthens ties with India's neighbours," it said.

"Some neighbouring countries have not benefited significantly from India's rapid economic growth. This will hamper New Delhi in improving its regional influence," it said.
"However, India cannot hinder China's efforts in promoting regional integration. Additionally, Asian countries like Pakistan keep a positive attitude toward Chinese efforts to improve infrastructure in the region."

"If India still holds suspicions toward China and excludes itself from the moves of promoting regional integration, the country will perhaps end up simply watching China's influence among its neighbouring countries rise," it claimed.


(The chinese contradiction...china cant even get the CPEC done and is barking)


http://www.dnaindia.com/india/repor...china-pakistan-corridor-chinese-media-2274592



Now that the chinese have spoken the REAL TRUTH and issue.



CPEC Inaguration just a FEW DAYS Back and NOW chinese speaking something else
These Fools

 

[Indx TechStyle]

Please enter a message with at least 30 characters.

 

[angeldude13]

You little shit stained pig head bastard, you expect us to engage with you little bitches after you use terms like these? Get the fuck out and bang some madrassa women.

You mean madarsa goat
30 chars

 

[aditya10r]

You mean madarsa goat
30 chars

And his sister as well..................................................................................

 

[angeldude13]

And his sister as well..................................................................................

Sister/wife is same thing for them.
He is probably married to his sister.