Could We Trust Killer Robots?

Discussion in 'Military Aviation' started by W.G.Ewald, May 19, 2012.

  1. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Could We Trust an Army of Killer Robots? - WSJ.com
     
  2.  
  3. ashicjose

    ashicjose Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    58
    Is this true that, there is no man behind this drone to decide whether it to fire or not ?.
     
  4. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    That is specifically stated in the article.

     
  5. ashicjose

    ashicjose Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    58
    Think of a sky where drones patrolling and some waiting on the tarmac to intercept the enemy and what will be the roll of humans in that world ?
     
  6. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    To be targets.

    The Terminator (1984) - IMDb
     
  7. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,336
    Likes Received:
    4,463
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    What advantage is achieved by allowing the drone to be autonomous ?
    Can the same thing not be done by a soldier in control of the drone ?
    Don't tell me, it's to save money by reducing soldiers on pay roll.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2012
  8. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    The man proposing such a system gives this reason as the benefit:

     
    Dovah likes this.
  9. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,336
    Likes Received:
    4,463
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    I think humans are better decision makers than any machine and will be for the foreseeable future. Humans have intelligence, machines run calculations. Besides, there is minimal 'heat of battle' as the controllers are probably in far-away (air conditioned) rooms making their decisions and confirming with higher ups.

    Probably the only advantage is the speed of the machine, and that is why I think the future of battle will involve fusing of man and machine with man in control.
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2012
    asianobserve and W.G.Ewald like this.
  10. W.G.Ewald

    W.G.Ewald Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2 Defence Professionals

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Messages:
    14,140
    Likes Received:
    8,528
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    I think you are right. There is a link in the 7th paragraph of the article to a video by Dr. Arkin. It may show some more of his thinking. He has been funded for six years by the U.S. Army Research Office, and he must want funding to continue. Whether the project results in an operational system remains to be seen.
     
    Razor likes this.
  11. Razor

    Razor CIDs from Tamilnadu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    5,336
    Likes Received:
    4,463
    Location:
    ഭരതം (Bharatham)
    I just read an article on UCAV's and noted that the only disadvantage of having a controller (man in the loop), is as I mentioned earlier, slower response time.

    Anyways, according to international Laws of War, there are certain restrictions on using autonomous systems for targeted killings. Check this out.

    Source : Unmanned combat air vehicle - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
    W.G.Ewald likes this.

Share This Page