Chinese JF-17 is a Cheap Competition For The F-16

Drsomnath999

lord of 32 teeth
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
1,273
Likes
1,376
Country flag
2011-11-25 (China Military News cited from strategypage.com) -- Pakistan is aggressively seeking customers for its JF-17 jet fighter. During the last two years, Pakistan has manufactured about 30 JF-17. The first JF-17s were manufactured in China. But the plan was always to shift production to Pakistan, with the original goal of 25 a year being produced by 2011. This goal was not achieved, but production has been established in Pakistan, and it is growing.
Pakistan is offering the JF-17 for a low price ($25 million in the cheapest configuration) and touts the fact that this is a third the price of an F-16. But this is comparing apples and oranges. The low end JF-17 is little more than a day time interceptor. The most capable F-16 model in service is the F-16I, used exclusively by Israel. It's basically a modified version of the F-16C/D Block 50/52, equipped with more advanced radar (the APG-68(X)) and the ability to carry Israeli weapons like the Python 4 air-to-air missile and the Popeye 2 air-to-surface missile. Costing $70 million each, the F-16I has an excellent navigation system, which allows it to fly on the deck (a few hundred feet from the ground), without working the pilot to death. The aircraft can do this at night or in any weather. The F-16I can carry enough fuel to hit targets 1,600 kilometers away (meaning Iran is within range). The aircraft uses the latest short and long range air-to-air missiles, as well as smart bombs. Electronic countermeasures are carried, as is a powerful computer system, which records the details of each sortie in great detail. This is a big help for training. The F-16I is basically optimized to deliver smart bombs anywhere, at any time, in any weather and despite dense air defenses. This further increases Israel's military power versus its neighbors. In combat, one F-16I is worth more than three JF-17s. But what Pakistan is really touting here is the availability of a jet fighter that is cheap and performs somewhat like an F-16. For many countries, this is an attractive option. The only problem is that there are hundreds of second-hand (and very well maintained) F-16s on the market, selling for less than the bare-bones JF-17.
The Chinese designed JF-17 (also known as FC-1) is also manufactured in China, which is trying to export it to Algeria, Egypt, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Burma, Iran and Sri Lanka as an inexpensive alternative to American and Russian fighters. So far, no takers. The hundreds of JF-17s to be built in Pakistan are mainly composed of Chinese parts, and the Chinese Air Force has not shown any interest in obtaining the aircraft for its own use. Officially, the Chinese Air Force is still "evaluating" the JF-17, but unofficially, Chinese air force commanders consider the JF-17 a failed design.

Last year, Pakistan signed a deal to buy the next 42, of 300, of these jets from China. These 42 will cost $14.3 million per aircraft. The final 250 will cost $12 million each. The aircraft is assembled in both Pakistan and China, with the engines coming from Russia, and most of the other components from China (which calls the aircraft the FC-1).
When the first JF-17 fighter arrived in Pakistan four years ago, it ended over twenty years of development for what was first called the Super 7 fighter. The JF-17 was developed by China in cooperation with Pakistan, which originally only wanted to buy 150 of them. All this came about because Pakistan could not get modern fighters from anyone else, and turned to China. At the time, China had nothing comparable to the early model F-16s Pakistan already had.
The 13 ton JF-17 is meant to be a low cost alternative to the American F-16. The JF-17 is considered the equal to earlier versions of the F-16, but much less effective than more recent F16 models. The JF-17 design is also based on a cancelled Russian project, the MiG-33. Originally, Pakistan wanted Western electronics in the JF-17, but because of the risk of Chinese technology theft, and pressure from the United States (who did not want China to steal more Western aviation electronics), the JF-17 uses Chinese and Pakistani electronics.
The JF-17 can carry 3.6 tons of weapons and uses radar guided and heat seeking missiles. It has max speed of nearly 2,000 kilometers an hour, an operating range of 1,300 kilometers and a max altitude of nearly 18,000 meters (55,000 feet). China says it does not want to use the JF-17 itself because its own J-10 (another local design) and J-11 (a license built Russian Su-27) are adequate for their needs. The J-10, like the JF-17, did not work out as well as was hoped, but that's another matter. Meanwhile, Pakistan has one squadron in service, and another being formed.
Chinese JF-17 is a Cheap Competition For The F-16 | China Military Power Mashup
 

Drsomnath999

lord of 32 teeth
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
1,273
Likes
1,376
Country flag
well god knows who would buy JF17.???
i think pak should sell jf 17 like this


saying " jf17 lelo jf17 .ekh ka sath ekh free "
 
Last edited:

SpArK

SORCERER
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
2,093
Likes
1,112
I suppose China wont buy it.

Too risky.

 

Zebra

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
6,060
Likes
2,303
Country flag
So the buying price of JF 17 is 12 to 14.3 million $ only , but Pakistan wants to sell it at 25 million $ ($25 million in the cheapest configuration) . :pound:
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
I got few a Q. Do Chinese air force has F-17 blunder and lafunder??

I think pak is the only country using this lafunder. I think china has made this for pak , .In order to recover the cost, as pak has not paid for wat ever lafunder they got. now nobody is buying.

koi to lelo

I think, all the air forces of the world is scared of JF-17 lafunder, as pakistan claims, they made it. pilots all over the world fear that if they put lafunder jf-17 in auto pilot mode, it might land in taliban land in north or south waziristan:scared2::scared2::scared2::scared2::scared2::scared2::laugh::laugh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Drsomnath999

lord of 32 teeth
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
1,273
Likes
1,376
Country flag
is this another feel good thread? Some no name writer and ppl take that as the truth. 12mill for a fighter?right. I guess ppl believe what they want to believe.
well it is unbeleivable then read from a pakistani writer what they say about jf 17

The odd relationship out among the combination within this nuclear troika is Pakistan and China. Odd not because it is unexpected but because it is inevitable. India has fought wars with both China and Pakistan while Beijing and Islamabad have never. The maxim of 'my enemy's enemy is my friend' makes sense to cultivate by these two. However, because of the policies and goals and economic and military capacities, this is not an equal relationship. China gets the satisfaction of strategic policy encirclement of India by being Pakistan's 'all-weather friend'. All Pakistan gets is a guarantee of no veto against it in the United Nations. China doesn't do grants, aid and budgetary support – the three perennial shopping items in Pakistan's basket. The best it does is investment and that's purely profit-centric, Beijing managing to recoup any money it 'gives away' in this shape to Pakistan. The 50 Thunder jets is the perfect ingredient of this unequal but functional relationship: Pakistan restores some of its India-centric edge in the sky while China actually gets money from Pakistan to install strategic air restraints over India towards the side of India where Beijing is not itself present! Hence the Indian concern at the Thunder deal between Islamabad and Beijing.


But the problem, from a citizen's perspective in Pakistan, is that despite their one war, China and India are also major trade partners while Pakistan is a small fry when it comes to being a commerce pair. According to the Confederation of Indian Industry, while international trade has been growing at around 15 per cent on an average, India-China trade has increased by more than 50 per cent annually in the last five years. In 2008, China became India's largest trading partner and the bilateral annual trade between the two countries touched $52bn. India has emerged as the 7th largest export market of China and 10th largest trade partner. The bilateral trade between the two most populous countries is set to cross $100bn per annum by end of 2012. Since it is projected that, by 2050, India and China will be the two leading economies in the world, it is inevitable that bilateral trade between the two countries will be among the most important economic relationships in the world. And all this between two traditional rivals! Why should China want to disturb this trade balance in its favor for Pakistan's obscure advantage when Beijing can get Indian money to beef up its military edge against New Delhi!

The Sino-Pak annual trade by comparison is puny despite some strides in recent years. It has increased from $1.9bn in 2002 to $6.9bn in 2011. The two have vowed to ramp this up to $15bn by 2014. China, which has surpassed the EU as Pakistan's second-largest trading partner, exported goods worth $5.5bn to Pakistan in 2010 and imported $1.3bn worth of products. This means Pakistan is a net exporter of money to China! And yet Pakistan crows about a relationship that is 'deeper than the oceans and higher than the mountains'. The reality is that Pakistan sells itself cheap for this grossly unequal relationship for merely a veto shield at the UN.

The real story is not that China is providing Pakistan a clutch of fighter planes or that India has problems with China squeezing it a bit in the western sector – after all India's own fighter jet acquisition spree more than neutralises any strategic edge Beijing or Islamabad can sculpt from this deal. The story is in what has been left unsaid: why can't Pakistan invest $1.25bn to be paid for the planes in its tanking economy to revive it and with the profits generated buy whatever planes it wants? After all Pakistan can't afford to go to war with India anytime soon as it only has six days of oil reserves and can't push the fight more than six days and neither does China want Delhi and Islamabad to actually fight a war. So while Pakistan has an as-yet unnecessary edge in the sky what about the situation on the ground? Where will the money come from to cut the burgeoning poverty, unemployment and illiteracy?
Adnan Rehmat is a journalist, analyst and media development specialist. He heads Intermedia, a Pakistani media support NGO.
Sky Wars: Pakistan, India and China | Pakistan | DAWN.COM
 
Last edited:

agentperry

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
3,022
Likes
690
but 15 million dollar for those aircrafts which will come down in 2 years. 7.5 million dollar for one year. isnt it an expensive replacement?
 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
I believe Burkina Faso has shown interest in buying!
 

dev.uitda

Regular Member
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
16
Likes
21
f16?? gripen??? Comeon.. The article is inaccurate. JF17 is a scientifically technically actually biologically chemically automatically very advanced aircraft complex with 10:1 success ratio against all known UFOs and is pitched as a direct competition to F22. While most advanced planes are made of carbon composites, JF17 is made of unobtainium (look up in wiki). The sensor fusion and avionics use brain wave technology which can sense what the pilot thinks and put it into action, more like the Eywa connection of Avatar. Chinese news arent as creative as expected, but still, very much a commendable effort indeed.
 

utubekhiladi

The Preacher
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
4,768
Likes
10,311
Country flag
f16?? gripen??? Comeon.. The article is inaccurate. JF17 is a scientifically technically actually biologically chemically automatically very advanced aircraft complex with 10:1 success ratio against all known UFOs and is pitched as a direct competition to F22. While most advanced planes are made of carbon composites, JF17 is made of unobtainium (look up in wiki). The sensor fusion and avionics use brain wave technology which can sense what the pilot thinks and put it into action, more like the Eywa connection of Avatar. Chinese news arent as creative as expected, but still, very much a commendable effort indeed.

unobtainium hahahahah hahaahah :pound: :pound: :pound:

JF 17 is better than



 

KS

Bye bye DFI
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
8,005
Likes
5,758
f16?? gripen??? Comeon.. The article is inaccurate. JF17 is a scientifically technically actually biologically chemically automatically very advanced aircraft complex with 10:1 success ratio against all known UFOs and is pitched as a direct competition to F22. While most advanced planes are made of carbon composites, JF17 is made of unobtainium (look up in wiki). The sensor fusion and avionics use brain wave technology which can sense what the pilot thinks and put it into action, more like the Eywa connection of Avatar. Chinese news arent as creative as expected, but still, very much a commendable effort indeed.
:pound: LMAO..
 

Drsomnath999

lord of 32 teeth
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
1,273
Likes
1,376
Country flag
f16?? gripen??? Comeon.. The article is inaccurate. JF17 is a scientifically technically actually biologically chemically automatically very advanced aircraft complex with 10:1 success ratio against all known UFOs and is pitched as a direct competition to F22. While most advanced planes are made of carbon composites, JF17 is made of unobtainium (look up in wiki). The sensor fusion and avionics use brain wave technology which can sense what the pilot thinks and put it into action, more like the Eywa connection of Avatar. Chinese news arent as creative as expected, but still, very much a commendable effort indeed.
 

cir

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
1,996
Likes
269
This is so hilarious :rofl:coming from people whose own country can't make a darn thing (The Tejas springs to mind:rofl:)after trying so hard for 30 freaking long years。:rofl:
 

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,556
Country flag
I guess that's what it takes to honestly develope a real jet fighter from scratch.
 

tony4562

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
836
Likes
49
Tejas can hardly be called an indigenous jet made from scratch. With the admitted 60% imported content (in reality probably higher since indian parts with foreign-amde subparts are counted as indigenous), LCA is not a true indigenous aircraft by any stretch. And if you open the aircraft don't find design elements from Mig21, i would be very surprised as Mig21 was the only modern aircraft India had any experience building at the time the basic design of LCA was made. Also don't tell me the striking similarities between LCA and Mirage 2000 were just pure coincidence, with Mirage2000 being in service with IAF when LCA was designed and itself an aircraft IAF likes a lot.

LCA = Mirage2000 external design + Mig21 intrnal design + american engine + israeli radar + everythingelse european

The picture says it all, LCA is truely an international product.

 

Ray

The Chairman
Professional
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
43,132
Likes
23,835
Tejas is not indigenous.

It was built with technical help from Mars!
 

dev.uitda

Regular Member
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
16
Likes
21
Tejas can hardly be called an indigenous jet made from scratch. With the admitted 60% imported content (in reality probably higher since indian parts with foreign-amde subparts are counted as indigenous), LCA is not a true indigenous aircraft by any stretch. And if you open the aircraft don't find design elements from Mig21, i would be very surprised as Mig21 was the only modern aircraft India had any experience building at the time the basic design of LCA was made. Also don't tell me the striking similarities between LCA and Mirage 2000 were just pure coincidence, with Mirage2000 being in service with IAF when LCA was designed and itself an aircraft IAF likes a lot.

LCA = Mirage2000 external design + Mig21 intrnal design + american engine + israeli radar + everythingelse european

The picture says it all, LCA is truely an international product.




Yeah Yeah Yeah, open LCA and you will be more than surprised. Actually you might find a bicycle in it:sad:. The pilot has to pedal so fast to compress the air and help use it in the jet stream. Oh come on. We are not claiming it to be an F22 like you do:scared2:.

It doesnt share anything in common with Mig21 except deployment. LCA has an advanced fly-by-wire system while Mig21 clearly hasn't got that (Unlike the wireless system in JF17:sad:). Another commonality is that both has a seat for the driver (read: pilot, that was a joke :wave:) It looks similar to Mirage2000? it is because both planes have similar theory behind design.. highly unstable delta wing. Is it a copy? No. Why? Just design config wouldn't suffice. A small change in aerodynamics alone will take a lot of testing. The standing proof for LCA being an original design is the years of R&D in windtunnels. Engine is american, but we have a project in place which will bear fruits soon. Why we still persist with it? Because it sets us free from buying and creates a great platform for our future products. We have an israeli radar in it and an R&D program in place along with that. Why do we buy/collaborate? because we dont have that infrastructure yet and we are willing to pay and learn (read: not stealing). Aw'well.. I can go on and on naming fingers and pointing names, but couldn't just give two hoots.
 

tony4562

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
836
Likes
49
I was refering to the airframe design. You have to get experience from somewhere, in LCA's case manufacturing experience gained from Mig21 was prettymuch the only source of reference available. Also tailless delta configuration has nothing to do with fly-by-wire. Mirage2000 looks almost like a carbon copy of Mirge3 which first flew in 1956 and certainly did not have any fly-by-wire at all.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A.V. Another Cheap Chinese Copy China 203
skywatcher Chinese Lunar Exploration Program China 0
LETHALFORCE Attacks on Chinese in Pakistan Pakistan 10
Satish Sharma Idiotic musing of Chinese communist party. China 2

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top