Do you think Guidance and Rocket Propulsion from Brahmos, MBDA , Barak etc etc is not going cross over. You think our collaberations on Missile tech wont have any impact on our ICBM program? Really.
You still havent answered how Cryogenic engines are the most 'important' tech for ICBM's. Come on chicom, spill the beans. STFU. If you dont know. Walk away. Learn to assess when you have been found wanting.
And how exactly are the guidance systems of air-to-air, surface-to-air and cruise missiles going to help you develop a rocket engine with the power to carry multiple warheads over 5000km's?
Extract: "In the early stages of designing a new booster for communications satellites, India struck a deal with Russia to provide hydrogen-fueled rocket engines and technical know-how.
The agreement was quashed in 1992 after U.S. authorities imposed sanctions on Glavkosmos, the Russian company providing technology to India. The United States feared the transfer of missile technology from the fractured Soviet Union to developing states.
India responded by purchasing seven readymade cryogenic engines from Russia and starting the design of an indigenous upper stage from scratch.
The Russian design would become the third stage for India's first generation of Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicles, a medium-lift rocket tailored to haul communications spacecraft to orbits high above Earth.
The GSLV first launched in 2001. Five of the rockets blasted off with Russian third stages through 2007.
The Russian stage was blamed for two minor glitches in 2001 and 2007 that stranded payloads in slightly different orbits than planned. A liquid-fueled strap-on booster triggered a dramatic explosion shortly after a launch in 2006.
Three other GSLV flights were successful."
Yes, my hateful friend, cryogenic engine tech is much more useful when building high power ballistic missiles than mica guidance systems, much more important that cruise missile guidance systems. Any insults before I go to sleep?