- Joined
- Apr 17, 2009
- Messages
- 43,132
- Likes
- 23,835
Well, I bend it like Beckham!I can't agree with all the points you raised in the post, but you did offer another perspective for us to look at this issue and this is the best post by you I have ever read so far on this forum. But there is something I want to add here.
An important factor we should take into consideration is that the cold war is over. USSR, the country which used to take the majority criticism from west had collapsed, and its inheritor Russia is still recovering. If in the old days USSR managed to divert most of the attention, today's China is becoming, with a little exggeration, the only target of the whole western community. With so many countries aiming at China, sitting still and doing nothing won't make them stop, but encourage them to do more. China needs to do something, even for symbolic cause.
Nonetheless, you still made a point by suggesting China is making a big fuss over this Nobel Prize thing.
To be frank, even though it may appear that I am not too fond of China, that would be a fair assessment.
I find China's history and civilisation very fascinating. I even find Mao intriguing and interesting a personality. True, he was ruthless, yet when you look at China that he inherited, it was only a rude jolt that could wake up an Opium sedated indolent people. Like wise, if you take Lenin and Stalin for Russia.
Contradictory as it may appear, my inner self, rebelled against the manner in which they (Stalin and Mao) treated people as mere assets for their plans and not as human beings with personal requirements, feeding them on a staple of questionable patriotism.
In the same manner, while I like Bush and honestly I do, yet I am horrified at the manner in which he approached issues, benumbing the people with patriotism to make them impervious to human sensibilities.
I find it uncomfortable when people or Govts cloak their intent and action with pious platitudes and homilies. For instance, China is doing very well. Not all the actions are likeable and so why cloak them with false cosmetic washed political statements?
If China has gone the capitalist way and junked the Communist way, so be it. Why give it a convoluted nomenclature that is neither here nor there and totally meaningless? What is there to save face about? Let the results speak for them, and tell the world take it or leave it!
If human rights are being violated as per western standards, so be it. Where is the requirement to justify?
If in China, religion is to be state controlled and not Vatican controlled, say so openly and tell the Pope to take a walk. Or why it has to be State controlled in Xinjiang. Or explain it as to why it has to be State controlled so that foreign influences do not use religion to cause unrest as it is happening elsewhere.
This is more so since China is no longer a pushover. It has made its mark. Therefore, stand tall and boldly march into the future without worrying about minor pinpricks that comes everyone's way if they are to be leaders of destiny.
Look at the US. Everyone is at their door with the alms bowl. And having taken the alm, they also have no hesitation to abuse the US. The US has got used to it!! And now they really don't care!