Canards vs Levcons

Discussion in 'Military Aviation' started by utubekhiladi, Apr 28, 2012.

  1. utubekhiladi

    utubekhiladi The Preacher Elite Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    1,423
    Location:
    TX, USA
    lets discuss about pros and cons of canards and levcons.

    - thanks
     
    indian_sukhoi, pmaitra and A chauhan like this.
  2.  
  3. pmaitra

    pmaitra Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31,663
    Likes Received:
    17,161
    Location:
    EST, USA
    Kunal Biswas and utubekhiladi like this.
  4. p2prada

    p2prada Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    10,233
    Likes Received:
    3,896
    Location:
    Holy Hell
    There really aren't many functional differences as such. These are just design solutions to achieve the required aerodynamic states.

    Considering LEVCONS are part of the PAKFA, IMHO, the radar returns may be lesser than Canards. Perhaps the aerodynamic qualities of Canards are greater at low altitudes as compared to LEVCONS. N-LCA uses them for primarily landing while PAKFA probably uses them for an entirely different purpose.
     
    indian_sukhoi, A chauhan and pmaitra like this.
  5. indian_sukhoi

    indian_sukhoi Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    224
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Btw, Do Su-35s has levcons fitted?. Read somehwere that levcons effects on aircraft intakes?



    Although, Canards increase RCS of an aircraft. Typhoon and Rafale canards are controlled by software which reduces its RCS.
    Another set back is that increase drag and kill lift. The MKIs and Typhoons face a lot of drag, Thats why the new Su-35s doesn't have any canards.

    Has P2P already said, Naval Aircrafts could use canards for short landing. Canards can be usefull as brakes better than aircraft tail.
     
  6. Twinblade

    Twinblade Senior Member Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,405
    Likes Received:
    2,414
    The few reasons why Canards impart a higher RCS, from what I can see is,

    a) Canards are in not the same plane as the main wing (JAS-39, Rafale, Typhoon) and hence provide an additional edge for radar reflections.
    [​IMG]

    Furthermore most canards designs (as in the euro birds) are not optimised for planform alignment. with the exception of YF-23 naval variant which had proper planform alignment.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    A LEVCON on the other hand can be both edge aligned as well as planform aligned.
    [​IMG]

    b) Any moving surface in the front aspect will have a seam, a gap with the adjacent surface, and any surface imperfection will bounce back em waves. A canard will have the widest seam considering the degree of movement and the bending forces it will experience. A levcon might be able to get away (strictly in my opinion only) with lower a smaller surface gap and your regular leading edge managing the highest tolerance in finish. A conventionally designed fighter has the option of hiding the seams of its moving surfaces behind the main wing, while a canard does not give you that option.

    Just my 2 cents.
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2012
  7. p2prada

    p2prada Stars and Ambassadors Stars and Ambassadors

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    10,233
    Likes Received:
    3,896
    Location:
    Holy Hell
    Rafale, hides the seams.
    [​IMG]

    So, stealthy. :p

    4th generation aircraft have never been stealth optimised to the extent 5th gen are.

    Cannot say the same for J-20 though.
     

Share This Page