Heh - again the same link. In the course of discussions with Pakis on the internet, I must have been presented this link ten thousand times.
While comparing against other countries, the author compares the roads as in the 1990s. That idiot author speaks of a "single lane road in Indian side of the border". This was the case in the 1990s. After the GQ was completed in mid 2000s, all roads that are part of GQ are excellent 4-lane or 6-lane ones.
@Bangalorean
The author moved to India in 2007 as chief correspondent where he has focused on India's economic and political story as well as traveling to Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nepal. It is there in the link if you read it more carefully. Thus he is not talking about roads in 1990's but late 2000. I gave you that link only because he is neutral and he visited both countries.
I am very well aware of the development of roads, express ways in India and there is no doubt that India made a drastic progress in its road infrastructure in past 20 years. But Pakistan did the same thing and perhaps you are not aware of it.
India is a big country with over billion population so people in India likes to travel by train for longer distances because it is much convenient for them. Thus their trains are far better than Pak. On the other other hand, Pak is a small country with small population compared to India. The Balochistan is 45% of Pak's total land but its population is nearly 10 millions which is less than Lahore and Lahore is half of the Karachi. So people in Pak likes to travel by roads for short distances cos it is much convenient for them and which is why Pak has started developing its road structure much earlier than India.
Anyway I am finishing my arguments as I not come here again and again. Cheers.