Indeed. Rather than infighting members shall focus on making use of this new leverage to their advantage within and beyond the bloc.This is a good proposal. Petty politics should be put aside.
Rousseff left open the possibility of using the fund to help non-BRICS nations, saying the group would be willing to "examine" any request from Argentina.
"We are open to see what relationship (the fund) could have with countries outside the BRICS group but it hasn't been decided yet because we just formed this institution," she said after Tuesday's summit.
"If Argentina will benefit or not is something that we will have to examine "¦ (but) first Argentina must make a request," she said. "Our view is that we would be generous to developing countries."
Russia's recent experience over Ukraine has shown that the West is ready to eject politically unruly countries from its economic system. If they are able to successfully establish themselves, the BRICS's inauguration of multilateral financial institutions rooted outside the reach of Western oversight could provide insulation from Western economic clout to countries like Russia and China, whose growth threatens to put it at odds with Japan, a U.S. ally and G7 member.
then India has to provide good causes for your objections, otherwise it only proves that India is an irresponsible partner.India will ensure that China does not try to dominate others !!!
All BRICS countries will contribute equally... If India objects funds for TIBET then China have to respect that ...
One China and One India are mutually inclusive....
BRICS without India will fail ....
All will have equal influence as they all contribute equally for the corpus... As I said India wants to ensure that China does not try to take advantage un duly ...then India has to provide good causes for your objections, otherwise it only proves that India is an irresponsible partner.
equality is what separates brics bank from other similar existing organizations, but that doesnt mean every member in the bank will have the equal amount of influence.
China will have more influence than India, that is natural since China has more strength. it's something India has to accept and adjust to, not something you fight against.
so far, India is not doing good as a constructive contributor. the bank almost could not make it because at the last minute India was still pitching Delhi although the other 3 agreed on Shanghai. in order to make it happen, Brasil gave on the first presidency in exchange for India's compromise.
Shanghai has unparalled advantages over Delhi to be the headquarter of the bank, what India was doing is simply selfish.
Sent from my HUAWEI T8951 using Tapatalk 2
Can you please elaborate(about the part highlighted in bold). Basically i want to know how the bank could/would function. What are the roles& responsibilities of president and other board members. #justasking. Also please provide links for that. Thanks.China will be providing Brazil's and South Africa's funding tranches for the bank as several callable notes made to specialized entities set up in each of those countries. The board members from those countries come from those entities, and not directly from their governments. China can call in portions or all of Brazil's and South Africa's funding tranches at any time, effectively granting China de facto control over the votes of Brazil and South Africa because China can unilaterally defund those entities and hence kick them out of the bank at any time. In conjunction with Russia's concession to Chinese leadership on this issue, China controls 4/5ths of the votes in the bank.
India gets the president post for 5 years, but the bylaws of the bank will not be set up like the IMF/World Bank where the President has de facto project authority. Under the new bylaws (which China won the right to write), the vast majority of the bank's authority will be concentrated in an operating staff drawn from the Chinese Ministry of Finance and Chinese Development Bank, and they will be the ones responsible for finding projects for the bank to lend to.
Of course, it is well and good that the Indian commentariat feels like it has 'won' on this issue, given how easily bruised their feelings are. But de facto power in the bank still resides in China's hands, it will be hidden, and the average Indian will never know about it.
This is not to suggest India 'lost' at the meeting. India's weak hand at the meeting, coupled with China's skill at trade and commercial negotiation, meant this outcome was a foregone conclusion. It is interesting, however, to see how Modi has shown his skills as a politician and manager of public relations, even if his lack of experience in playing hardball international negotiation (he has only been PM for 2 months vs. Xi's experience as China's VP since 2008) has shown through.
LOL it isn't a railway, it is a simple highway, and since it is crossing the amazonia you can imagine how big il will beAmigos here comes a potential [1ST] biz for NEW Development Bank
China supports Peru-Brazil transcontinental railway
Perfectly engaging Brazil and China as BRICS founding members, plus Peru a neighbour of Brazil
theoritically, each member has equal influence. in reality, the one with more resource will have an upper hand.All will have equal influence as they all contribute equally for the corpus... As I said India wants to ensure that China does not try to take advantage un duly ...
Well, based on sources available so far all points to a "trilateral work group" to be set up. If this were merely a "propaganda" as u suggested, the 3 countries really have made it BIG involving the 3 presidents in the hoooopla but what's the point for such a bravado?LOL it isn't a railway, it is a simple highway, and since it is crossing the amazonia you can imagine how big il will be
If brasil really wants to connect to China there is already a transoceanic railway trought Bolivia, just 20 km left to connect the two sides and the need to modernize it. Plus Bolivia is chinese friendly and has a strategic world resource, 50% of world lithium, everyone that understand a bit of electronics know how important it is, if not just open your cellphone battery slot and read it.
so it is just propaganda
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2014xibricssummit/2014-07/17/content_17808950.htmDuring a meeting with Peruvian President Ollanta Humala, Xi noted that the three countries will issue a joint statement later in the day on the railway project, which will run all the way from the Peruvian Pacific coast to the Brazilian Atlantic coast.
Chinese direct investment and value of foreign assets in Brazil totaled over US$ 15 billion as of 2010, according to an official with the Brazilian government.
In 2010 alone, Chinese public and private investment in Brazil increased to US$ 300 million, making it the largest investor in Brazil, said Tatiana Rosito, minister-counselor to Brazil's embassy in Beijing.
Since all will contribute financially equally so China getting upper hand does not exist. Moreover India will be heading the Bank for next 6 years... China will try to influence it but if it tries to dominate India will stand upto it...theoritically, each member has equal influence. in reality, the one with more resource will have an upper hand.
New Delhi provides same facilities as Shanghai... un solicited influence from China will be taken care off by India... make no mistake... India provides as much as China...each country offered a city to be the headquarter of the bank, Shanghai wons because of its unmatched advantage. there will be other cases in the future where China offers items no one would deny, that is influence.
The so called BRICS bank will be a disaster if China wants to poke its nose into its operations... India will resist it tooth and nail...India's insecurity over Chinese influence in the bank right before the establishment of the bank sends a disturbing signal, that India could very possibly be an obstacle to the operation of the bank.
if India's priority is to contain Chinese influence in the bank instead of promoting the influence of the bank globally, i am expecting more inner struggle within the bank in the future. i think China should not put too much faith in the bank.
Sent from my HUAWEI T8951 using Tapatalk 2
Becuase you don't how much opposition is building a highway trought amazonian jungle generate, and we aren't speaking about China, luckely Brasil is a democracy, etnics groups, opposition, ngo, etc.. Etc.. Will be all over the place. Plus they will be under media cover since olympics are coming and after all FIFA world cup protest .Well, based on sources available so far all points to a "trilateral work group" to be set up. If this were merely a "propaganda" as u suggested, the 3 countries really have made it BIG involving the 3 leaders in the hoooopla but what's the point for such a bravado?
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2014xibricssummit/2014-07/17/content_17808950.htm
Meantime I agree the return on investment in such a gigantic project does look doubtful.
In 2011 China Largest Investor in Brazil -
...we are donating as a bank not as a nation,so no difference here with the chinese...it will be bank money,not his or her money,the bank will get common rating...Bose you are a BBB- country versus China that has AA- credit ranking. Your 10 billions have less value than chinese one because they have a lot more garantees.
It is like comparing Japan (AA-) to Morocco (BBB-).
And the rest of the brics can easily be blackmailed by China imports.
surely the chinese leadership isnt....it is already making plans for asian investment bank...with full chinese control..it has again made a dangle by inviting india as a founding member with a cake slice stake....india may well take it,cause frankly our pm is a gujju,who knows the value for money lik u guys.theoritically, each member has equal influence. in reality, the one with more resource will have an upper hand.
each country offered a city to be the headquarter of the bank, Shanghai wons because of its unmatched advantage. there will be other cases in the future where China offers items no one would deny, that is influence.
India's insecurity over Chinese influence in the bank right before the establishment of the bank sends a disturbing signal, that India could very possibly be an obstacle to the operation of the bank.
if India's priority is to contain Chinese influence in the bank instead of promoting the influence of the bank globally, i am expecting more inner struggle within the bank in the future. i think China should not put too much faith in the bank.
Sent from my HUAWEI T8951 using Tapatalk 2
u won shanghai because putin and mms had gifted it to u,else u wudnt have it...theoritically, each member has equal influence. in reality, the one with more resource will have an upper hand.
each country offered a city to be the headquarter of the bank, Shanghai wons because of its unmatched advantage. there will be other cases in the future where China offers items no one would deny, that is influence.
India's insecurity over Chinese influence in the bank right before the establishment of the bank sends a disturbing signal, that India could very possibly be an obstacle to the operation of the bank.
if India's priority is to contain Chinese influence in the bank instead of promoting the influence of the bank globally, i am expecting more inner struggle within the bank in the future. i think China should not put too much faith in the bank.
Sent from my HUAWEI T8951 using Tapatalk 2
Yeah, but Chinese always want to show there influence. .surely the chinese leadership isnt....it is already making plans for asian investment bank...with full chinese control..it has again made a dangle by inviting india as a founding member with a cake slice stake....india may well take it,cause frankly our pm is a gujju,who knows the value for money lik u guys.
in return for our support to that bank,u will give us cheap cash in our infra projects...bigger and grander on scale than even most chinese projects...
it gives u business and gets our work done...
But as far the BRICS bank is concerned,neither u or we benefit much of it,because tussle for power will be there..it is mainly aimed to tell the imf and world bank to behave..rather than fund the developing world...
Yes it's 20% each. . .What is the voting percentage for each country? Is it 20% each?
Not bad. We have a say in at least one major institution. It's a start.Yes it's 20% each. . .
Probably you need to revise your basics again.Bose you are a BBB- country versus China that has AA- credit ranking. Your 10 billions have less value than chinese one because they have a lot more garantees.
It is like comparing Japan (AA-) to Morocco (BBB-).
And the rest of the brics can easily be blackmailed by China imports.
then India has to provide good causes for your objections, otherwise it only proves that India is an irresponsible partner.
equality is what separates brics bank from other similar existing organizations, but that doesnt mean every member in the bank will have the equal amount of influence.
China will have more influence than India, that is natural since China has more strength. it's something India has to accept and adjust to, not something you fight against.
so far, India is not doing good as a constructive contributor. the bank almost could not make it because at the last minute India was still pitching Delhi although the other 3 agreed on Shanghai. in order to make it happen, Brasil gave on the first presidency in exchange for India's compromise.
Shanghai has unparalled advantages over Delhi to be the headquarter of the bank, what India was doing is simply selfish.
Sent from my HUAWEI T8951 using Tapatalk 2
Would you be kind enough to explain what 'unparalleled advantages' and 'unmatched advantages' Shanghai has over the other countries to setup a BRICS bank?theoritically, each member has equal influence. in reality, the one with more resource will have an upper hand.
each country offered a city to be the headquarter of the bank, Shanghai wons because of its unmatched advantage. there will be other cases in the future where China offers items no one would deny, that is influence.
India's insecurity over Chinese influence in the bank right before the establishment of the bank sends a disturbing signal, that India could very possibly be an obstacle to the operation of the bank.
if India's priority is to contain Chinese influence in the bank instead of promoting the influence of the bank globally, i am expecting more inner struggle within the bank in the future. i think China should not put too much faith in the bank.
Sent from my HUAWEI T8951 using Tapatalk 2